Theories Discussion > Avalanche
What if a snow glide happened in the ravine?
Puchiko:
--- Quote from: Monika on February 07, 2019, 11:48:44 PM ---The theory of snow hitting them is contradicted by the fact that the Zolotarev camera around his neck was staying intact (only film was damaged by water). How is it possible that a large mass of snow will cause severe injuries like broken ribs and the camera placed just a little higher (on the neck) is undamaged? And he had a notebook and a pencil in his hand, it also contradicts the snow hitting as well as the fall from tree.
--- End quote ---
I agree about the camera, but the existence of the notepad is disputed. The only evidence we have for it is Askinadzi's recent letter to Ural Pathfinder magazine. The whereabouts of the notepad are unknown, it was never filed in evidence or seen by anyone else.
sug2h:
--- Quote from: Monika on February 07, 2019, 11:48:44 PM --- And he had a notebook and a pencil in his hand, it also contradicts the snow hitting as well as the fall from tree.
--- End quote ---
And what if he was first hit by the snow, and then, knowing he was about to die, he asked his friends to give him a notepad in order to write a note to his family?
Does anybody know which type of camera it was?
Loose}{Cannon:
The camera is on a lanyard and able to swing freely. We don't know its position prior to removing him from the creek, nor where it was located during the impact.
The notebook was in his pocket, and his hands were in his pocket. He wasn't found with a notepad clutched in his hand flapping around in the water for months.
Monika:
--- Quote from: Loose}{Cannon on February 10, 2019, 12:12:59 AM ---The camera is on a lanyard and able to swing freely. We don't know its position prior to removing him from the creek, nor where it was located during the impact.
The notebook was in his pocket, and his hands were in his pocket. He wasn't found with a notepad clutched in his hand flapping around in the water for months.
--- End quote ---
He was found with his camera around his neck directly after finding of his body confirmed the photo from the crime scene available on internet. He had to have camera during the injury. After being badly injured, it would be pointless to put a camera around his neck. Why? He did not have the chance to survive, and he had to suffer terrible pains. And someone would lift his head to give him a camera around his neck ?
Loose}{Cannon:
--- Quote ---He had to have camera during the injury.
--- End quote ---
Who said the camera wasn't around his neck via the lanyard?
Why would anyone think this camera is BOLTED to his chest and not capable of swinging somewhere other then that position in freefall or similar?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version