Theories Discussion > Yeti / Snowman
The Yeti/ Bigfoot phenomenon
Star man:
--- Quote from: vdersik on July 09, 2019, 07:17:48 AM ---When it's the time for yeti, it is relatively easy to exclude this hominide as a suspected factor. These procedures which are about to accuse yeti of the crime must be done on the crime scene, in real time and real place. So far in 1950's some crucial evidences was not taken, the reason is unknown. Yeti existence on the crime scene and its involvement could be proven by some of these procedures/evidences>
1. Footprints around the scene which were not recorded.
2. Evidence of yeti existences in that mountain Kholat Syakhl do not exist. Mansi people nothing had seen.
3. According to biology researchers and scientists yeti does not exists.
- on the crime scene must be collected hair, nails, samples from the wounds MUST be collected, analyzed in laboratory, and DNA profiling and sequencing must be done, if once strange DNA is proven , that fact can be the leading fact in the investigation
- branches that were broken must be examined in detail, were they broken by human leg while climbing or something else (maybe bear or yeti) broke the branches, analyze their size, estimate, could they be broken by a human leg? was any bear capable of breaking them ? Analyze their composition here physics must give the answers
I think it is easy to know and exclude this creature involvement but here in this case the investigation was done incorrectly! Or we do not now all the information about that case
--- End quote ---
Apologies but I added some text to your quote that should have been highlighted red. It is under the foot print bit. Looks like it is now part of your post but it is mine.
Regards
Star man
sarapuk:
--- Quote from: vdersik on July 09, 2019, 07:17:48 AM ---When it's the time for yeti, it is relatively easy to exclude this hominide as a suspected factor. These procedures which are about to accuse yeti of the crime must be done on the crime scene, in real time and real place. So far in 1950's some crucial evidences was not taken, the reason is unknown.
I think it is easy to know and exclude this creature involvement but here in this case the investigation was done incorrectly! Or we do not now all the information about that case
--- End quote ---
Lots of things appear to be missing from the original Investigation including vital real evidence such as THE TENT. ETC.
Star man:
--- Quote from: sarapuk on July 11, 2019, 02:23:29 PM ---
--- Quote from: vdersik on July 09, 2019, 07:17:48 AM ---When it's the time for yeti, it is relatively easy to exclude this hominide as a suspected factor. These procedures which are about to accuse yeti of the crime must be done on the crime scene, in real time and real place. So far in 1950's some crucial evidences was not taken, the reason is unknown.
I think it is easy to know and exclude this creature involvement but here in this case the investigation was done incorrectly! Or we do not now all the information about that case
--- End quote ---
Lots of things appear to be missing from the original Investigation including vital real evidence such as THE TENT. ETC.
--- End quote ---
Yes it's interesting that page 303 is missing. But page 304 I believe presents clear evidence of at least several cuts from the inside. I suspect that much of the damage was a result of the poor way the tent was recovered, but there is evidence of 3 clear cuts where the blade has scratched the inside fabric before it penetrated it. Obviously it tells us nothing about who made the cuts or when or why.
Regards
Star man.
Naufragia:
Posting here because it seems the most appropriate place ...
Though I don't myself believe that yeti/menk/almasty had anything to do with the deaths of the Dyatlov hiking group, I do find it plausible that such creatures exist, or at least existed in the very recent past. In fact, I find it really sad to think that we just missed each other, as it were.
There is evidence for such hominids from the Caucasus, Chitral (in Pakistan) and Mongolia, so why not the Urals? Malcolm's Musings: Cryptozoology has some great resources, such as http://malcolmscryptids.blogspot.com/2012/03/creatures-of-caucasus-1-background.html and http://malcolmscryptids.blogspot.com/2012/05/yeti-of-pakistan-1.html#more.
Malcolm also does sea serpents - not relevant here, but very cool. wink1
alecsandros:
--- Quote from: Naufragia on June 21, 2020, 01:45:49 AM ---Posting here because it seems the most appropriate place ...
Though I don't myself believe that yeti/menk/almasty had anything to do with the deaths of the Dyatlov hiking group, I do find it plausible that such creatures exist, or at least existed in the very recent past. In fact, I find it really sad to think that we just missed each other, as it were.
There is evidence for such hominids from the Caucasus, Chitral (in Pakistan) and Mongolia, so why not the Urals? Malcolm's Musings: Cryptozoology has some great resources, such as http://malcolmscryptids.blogspot.com/2012/03/creatures-of-caucasus-1-background.html and http://malcolmscryptids.blogspot.com/2012/05/yeti-of-pakistan-1.html#more.
Malcolm also does sea serpents - not relevant here, but very cool. wink1
--- End quote ---
Many thanks for the links ! They are most interesting, and present scientific articles concerning the habitat and behaviour of the Almasty (Caucasian Yeti).
It's a shame the amount of sightings were already in stark decline at the time the articles were written (the early 1960s and 1980s). Perhaps the Almasty no longer exists... ?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version