Theories Discussion > General Discussion

New petition to the head of the Investigative Committee of Russia

(1/10) > >>

Teddy:
A petition to the head of the Investigative Committee of Russia, Alexander Bastrykin, from the Dyatlov Memorial Foundation will be presented in Yekaterinburg on June 26 at a round table, which will be held in the ITAR-TASS press center. The petition was signed by activists of the foundation, representatives of the Russian Geographical Society, as well as relatives of the dead hikers - Igor Dyatlov, Yuri Doroshenko and Rustem Slobodin.

It is expected that the sister of Igor Dyatlova Tatyana Perminova will personally take part in the round table. Participants will also perform a search job in 1959. Peter Bartholomew, Vladislav Karelin and Mikhail Sharavin, tragedy researchers Alexei Budrin, Alexander Alekseenkov and Vladimir Borzenkov, forensic expert Vladimir Ankudinov. “Russian Geographical Society” will be represented by extreme traveler Vladimir Rykshin and leaders Sverdlovsk Branch of the Russian Geographical Society.

Activists of the Dyatlov group’s memory fund and his supporters forced the prosecutor’s investigation into the death of Ural hikers to contact the Investigative Committee. Representatives of the supervisory authority stated that they stopped at three versions of what happened in 1959 on the Dyatlov Pass: a hurricane, an avalanche and a snowslab. Most of the activists of the Dyatlov Fund disagree with this - they insist on a “military version”, according to which Dyatlov group became witnesses or victims of weapon tests, after which they were eradicated.



"...While witnesses and participants of the search of those years are still alive, until the material evidences are not gone, until the environment of the incident is not trampled down, while the archives still store documents and evidence."


Letter is signed:
From relatives – Tatyana Perminova (Dyatlova)
From the Russian Geographical Society – Vladimir Rykshin
From Dyatlova Friends – Aleksey Budrin, Petr Bartholomew
From researchers – Vladimir Borzenkov
From advocacy – Evgeniy Chernousov

Teddy:
How did Dyatlov group die. Round table on the results of the investigation of the Prosecutor General - full video
“We demand the initiation of a normal criminal case” - Igor Dyatlov's sister, who died with his group in 1959, turned to Bastrykin - full transcription
Other links:
Why did Dyatlov group die
Relatives of Dyatlov group members ask the Federal Investigation Committee to conduct an objective investigation of the tragedy at the pass
They were killed by a rocket and radiation: Ural resident who met Dyatlov not far from the pass told his version of the tragedy
The head of the Investigative Committee will be asked to conduct a new investigation into the death of Dyatlov group
Karelin, member of the search operation told that a rocket killed Dyatlov group

snaika1079:
Yes. There is little need to know the background of the question. The kitchen so to speak of the relationship of different flows and structures. This is a very global issue and I will try to be as brief as possible.
 The situation in Russia has developed in such a way that mainly woodpeckers (studying the topic of HD or touched) took a break after the famous press conference of the representative of the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation (Sverdlovsk region) , "Komsomolskaya Pravda" and the Fund.  And because the major news there is, and time goes by, movements in the subject does not occur, a separate structure initiated by pushing the issue, especially that the original formula which promised the study of the versions have been extremely popular.  Statement : we will study the avalanche, snow Board and hurricane version ( snow Board = avalanche, everyone understands this).  It didn't look objective, if not completely unprofessional.

snaika1079:
There was no need to declare priorities, of which 66% in favor of the avalanche. One could say that they would study all the versions, it would be more professional and not biased.  Why did the Foundation come to life if its representative Bartholomew was at the press conference?  Because the Fund does not have a single clear structure. Today on behalf of the Fund atkaya reaction, tomorrow is different. Basically it's two people - Professor UPI-USTU Bartholomew or Fund Manager kuntcevich. Nopo missile version of, which can be called "Technogen" their opinion always coincide. And they fall in relation to the avalanche. To the conductor of this version E. Buyanov. Here it should be noted that in the Urals, few people support the avalanche version. And if only Uralets has okazyvatsya in Moscow circles, which revolve E. Buyanov, for example in alpinistka community, he became a supporter of the avalanche version, as happened with the search engines Axelrod and Kobzevym. And once upon ask those who should not be denied, the Fund had a hand in the publication of the book Buyanov avalanche accident DG. But he did one izuitskuyu thing. The book includes an article mentioned Borzenkova, who criticized laminou version big stigma. This caused resentment Buyanov. In the future, strife and even hatred.

snaika1079:
Then Buyanov managed what Kuntsevich could not. For example, to get access to some materials of the criminal case of Lev Ivanov. I must say that in Sverdlovsk could never put up with the avalanche variation of the accident, even in 1959, when the first time this option was proposed to stipulate in the case. The Prosecutor's office of the region and the same UPI were not inspired. Today, opponents are using their resources. You ask : why do they all need it? First, it was the case for the entire life of some famous dataweb. And secondly, it is also a small but business. Third, it is in the hands of those who distract from the main secret of the campaign, which is not really the cause of death. The reasons are allowed to argue until blue in the face. If only they did not touch the secret mission of tourists. And she Rakitino described in the right key, but with incorrect data on the composition of the working on the instructions of the KGB. By the way, the Rakitin Foundation also helped to produce the book. But Rakitin, as you can see, does not participate in the current passions.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page