Theories Discussion > Avalanche

You want avalanches? Here we go

<< < (4/8) > >>

Loose}{Cannon:
Something like this.

Dominov:
@loose Canon

Yes, you are right! That's a flashlight. But the model was this one -> a military flashlight, only for soldiers ;)

https://www.etsy.com/de/listing/255405654/jahrgang-sowjetischen-taschenlampe?ga_order=most_relevant&ga_search_type=all&ga_view_type=gallery&ga_search_query=soviet+flashlight&ref=sr_gallery-1-1

regards

Dominov

Loose}{Cannon:
Dont look the same to me, but being an veteran, I wouldn't be surprised.   Lots of Surplus stuff

sarapuk:

--- Quote from: Dominov on February 07, 2019, 03:47:31 AM ---Small addition:

Statement from Maslennikov about the tent before the search team started digging:

"The snow was not much, only drifted by the blizzards in the period of February." This statement is better than every picture.

Dominov

--- End quote ---

Yes you could say that the Avalanche Theory is on dodgy ground [ no pun intended ]. All the signs point to NO AVALANCHE of any kind whatsoever.  Location not suitable for an avalanche. Weather conditions not suitable for an avalanche. Findings of the search parties not conducive for an avalanche.

Star man:

--- Quote from: Loose}{Cannon on February 07, 2019, 09:45:30 AM ---Something like this.





--- End quote ---


Ok thanks LC.  I"ll put the camera back on my list of evidence again. 

Regards

Star

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page