On June, 26th in Ekaterinburg there has passed press conference by preliminary result of trip group Office Public Prosecutor Sverdlovsk area to Dyatlov pass. I took part in this press conference and I can tell some words about this event.
As has already written Teddy there 6 persons acted:Vladislav Karelin
- the participant of search, PhD1 (metallurgy of nonferrous metals), the Master sports USSR of difficult travel,Yury Kuntsevich
- the president Fund memory Dyatlov group.
Alexey Budrin - the skilled traveller, PhD2 (radio engineering and software), the Master sports USSR of difficult travel,Evgenie Chernousov
- the lawyer, PhD1 (jurisprudence),I am
- independent researcher of this event, PhD1 (aeronautics and the space technics), the Master sports USSR of difficult travel,Vladimir Rykshin
- the traveller of extreme direction, the Master sports USSR of difficult travel,Peter Bartolomey
- the participant of search, PhD2 (electric power industry),professor URFU(UPI), the Master sports USSR of difficult travel, Igor Dyatlov's friend.
The fullest text of the abstract performances can be read in Russian under the reference https://www.znak.com/2019-06-26/sestra_igorya_dyatlova_pogibshego_so_svoey_gruppoy_v_1959_godu_obratilas_k_bastrykinu
. In English I have not found publications in press. Now only.
I still had difficult impression about results of this conference because most of all journalists paid attention to outer side of this case. On purely paper or formal aspects. And interest was rather superficial. Most of all time have lawyer Evgenie Chernousov
who has decided to participate free of charge in case of reopening investigation on this event has occupied. He spoke much, rigidly and not clearly, as all lawyers. However I do not understand its legal basis for this purpose. Under the law of Russia if there was final decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and it has not been appealed against, any subsequent actions connected with investigation will be impossible. I spoke he about it on preliminary conversation, before press conference. He did not react to it in any way. Probably it simply course what make to itself loud name in circle of lawyers.
Submit such application to Investigatory committee of the Russian Federation it is useless. Even if it will accept, the Office of Public Prosecutor there and then will protest this decision. I entirely that for consequence under the law would make careful and objective investigation. However what for make absolutely unreal promises, I cannot understand. We will wait succession of events.
It is necessary tell two words concerning the decision of the Supreme court Russian Federation. It is result of very inept and illiterate actions of the known figure among the interested case of Dyatlov group - Alexander Nechaev from Novosibirsk town, more known under nickname as "Navig". He has submitted the claim to municipal court of the Ivdel city, and very illiterate in essence and without the sufficient facts in substantiation of this claim. After the negative decision in Ivdel, he has appealed against it to regional court of Sverdlovsk region, and then when has received there too the negative decision, tried to appeal against in the Supreme court Russian Federation. There too it has been rejected. Then appeal term on board of the Supreme court Russian Federation has been passed, and the decision became definitive. Thus he behaved as elephant in crockery shop, without paying attention to those remarks which to it were done by people competent of jurisprudence.
I think that even if and there was no this decision this case all the same would not began renew because for long time has passed limitation period and as because with 1959 there was no what that of the new facts under which it is possible hold additional consequence.
If people want to understand that there has occurred it is not necessary to hope for whom another. There will be no Santa Claus who will come and will bring ready solution of this case in the bag for gifts.Vladislav Karelin
again told about the rocket theory. Surprisingly it is another. On the eve of this press conference we with it lot time discussed this question with that arguments and documents which I have brought to it. At us very much good relations with it, therefore we what that always exchanges the interesting information. As result he has agreed that this rocket here could not be there in any way. Its words as the resume were such: “It is very detailed and convincing!” (c). However at press conference he again spoke about the rocket. It is very difficult get off old and rigid myths. Vladimir Rykshin
told about found nearby (in radius of 50 km or 30 ml) from pass two planes of easy class. One of them, it is Patrushev's plane which is unequivocally defined from documents which writer Oleg Arhipov has geted from inspector Korotayev (he investigated this failure in 1961) and by those fragments of wing which have been represented in photos of Rykshin. He does not understand it, because his base formation it is the sports trainer. To me it is unequivocally clear, because ribs of wing of plane as Jak-12 on which Patrushev flied, have the unique form. My base formation – is the expert in the aviation and rocket technics. As to he it is not clear, why they have found out there radiation in 300 microX-ray at hour. It is in 15 times more above normal background of the earth. To me too it is unequivocally clear that it is trace from aviation devices which at that time became covered by shone radioactive structures. And on wing there were sensor of icing of wing which too had radioactive isotopes as signal source. At them it was only 2 or 3 point source of such radioactive radiation, instead of the big area. The second plane - single monoplane of foreign manufactured which have started appear to Russia only in 90th years, therefore say about it for that understanding that has occurred to Dyatlov group senselessly. It has well remained, as has made emergency landing in 10 km to West from pass, therefore it is not necessary even define its type on fragments, it is possible find its image on directory of small aircraft. However Rykshin all the same have opinion that both planes concern Dyatlov group. It is very easy for understanding, if there is no possibility professionally understand details.
Professor Peter Bartolomey
said that the avalanche is the far-fetched theory and group could not throw all in any way and escape from tent. As well as in case with snow-storm ( strong wind). He considers that there was technogenic failure, but tell, what exactly and what signs it should possess it cannot. He very good expert in electricity power, but absolutely knows nothing about rockets and other military technology, but considers (just as Karelin) that «the rocket here is guilty!». It accepts objections silently, but can tell nothing in the answer.
I said to searchers that even if there were many conversations about rockets in 1959, it means nothing. About such in the beginning of last millenium the Chinese philosopher Konfutsy has told: „It is difficult find black cat in dark room... Especially, if it there is not present!“ (c)
For me have given least time, though Kuntsevich promised more, on what I counted, when wrote the performance abstract.
I have reported results researches March of this year on pass, approximately under the same program which declared command of Office of Public Prosecutor. Interest at correspondents was very weak. For certain they there simply have not understood much, and understand details it was difficult and boring. They at all have not understood that it completely contradicts that the Office of Public Prosecutor as preliminary theories declared. As well as that it «last nail to cover of coffin of the theory of Buyanov about avalanche».
At press conference there were no representatives of Office Public Prosecutor though Kuntsevich and organizers from ITAR-TASS invited them. Probably they silently sat in hall and listened, but in any way itself have not shown and have not made what that of statements.
Officially the Office Public Prosecutor promises declare check results in December 2019 or even in February 2020. They caused for Vladislav Karelin's poll, but have told nothing to it as result of conversation.