For example, for a long time it was believed, and some forces still insist on it, that the stove was not HEATED by tourists on the last night.
For a long time we were convinced, any story began with the question: why did the tourists in PANIC FLED from the tent?
And the most deadly question at any stated version: whence at tourists SUCH SERIOUS damages (Thibaut, Zolotarev, Dubinina).
There are a number of similar moments. But these are keys. And these keys determine the version. The most replicated version of the missiles and avalanche, the participation of the military in the massacre. If it works very well, not enough pages, and year of the explanatory proceedings. And if you pour water, as now happens in order to prevent sensible proceedings, then not enough and 10 years.
The General like said, can be move to particulars.
Respected Aspen, not see under these circumstances fisksirvoaniya traces and testimony eyewitnesses any traces technical funds type missiles on sorrow's, where teetered tent, also traces falsifications on shifting the tents. Why is the authors version of the missile (technogenic) vs hurricane to realize it's possible. But to deny the hurricane where he can't, though , because no clear traces of his absence, but the traces of the presence there of large power wind swept away the snow masses from the top so that the top cover was revealed before the advent of berries (there are testimonies of the search engines). By the way the video was submitted to the Internet Kuntsevich. About temperature, wind and humidity can definitely be said for the presence of " traces of columns." By the presence of the first corpse in the form of Slobodin says "corpse bed", the ice around the cooling body. Classic freezing. The others have no such signs. But there are plenty of other things. Of the many small details is not yet possible to create a single picture, unless you allow one terrible, very conspiracy conclusion: the case file reflects not what happened to the corpses in fact during life.