Theories Discussion > General Discussion

Logical analysis of tent cuts

<< < (5/6) > >>

Ziljoe:

--- Quote from: SURI on February 01, 2025, 10:55:57 PM ---I'm not surprised that it's still a mystery when even the forensic expert contradicts himself in the autopsy report. First he writes that the death was violent and then that they all died of hypothermia. I think he knew exactly what caused their deaths, but the conclusion must have been hypothermia.

--- End quote ---

Much of this has already been discussed.

In Russia, an accident is considered a violent death:

The types of violent death are: murder, suicide, accident.

He drowned, fell from a height, was struck by lightning, froze, got hit by a train, a car - all this is a violent death.

They can only write what they can conclude. Who knew what exactly caused their deaths?

All the case files say what happened, there are some contradictions , or what seem like contradictions but they fit together .

When the case was closed , everyone was  confused and angry , the families were angry at the delays and slow reaction for the search and rescue, the authorities were angry at the complacency of the UPI and it's measures to protect the students from harm.

People speculated at the time about things they didn't understand, the colour of their faces, the rocket tests in the skies etc.
The case was closed and they didn't have a clear cut reason to what drove them out if the tent , it must have been overwhelming!.

Much later , when the case was dragged out and back into the public's knowledge, every reporter jumped at the chance to sensationalise the mystery, books, balls of light, radiation , eyes and tongue cut out, radiation  , murder, KGB , accidental dates being changed on purpose etc etc ,were thrown about, miss quotes were used from "experts" etc.

The only mystery is , what made them leave the tent and can occur with what we have at the location and fits with the known facts .

Here's  why the autopsy says what it says. 





And since this is about tents , the tent was listed as a 12 person tent?

Partorg:
.

SURI:
I also have an interesting article that explains how the injuries could have occurred.

https://www.kp.ru/daily/26311.5/3189866/

Ziljoe:

--- Quote from: SURI on February 02, 2025, 01:40:08 AM ---I also have an interesting article that explains how the injuries could have occurred.

https://www.kp.ru/daily/26311.5/3189866/

--- End quote ---

These speculations are in another thread somewhere. I can't remember the conclusion, other than  a fight could cause some of those injuries but so could the environment, if not all. The "expert " in your link, I think suggested they were tied to a tree and tortured , he speculates wildly in my opinion. The lack of further and more severe injuries that could occur in a fight to the death  to the hikers kind of rules out any sort of fight. There should be broken hands, ripped off fingernails , broken jaws , Bite marks , scratches, ripped pockets , marks on the bodies where clothing was pulled into the skin .

All the marks on the hands and faces are consistent with other hypothermia cases found in winter conditions and hard frost.

GlennM:
There is simply no reason for it to be murder. There simply was a reason for them to leave the tent. Prove it and you win the Dyatlov Pass Incident lifetime achievement award. Many of us try, but we are blocked by the same reality. Whatever motivated them to leave was a transient effect, lost to time. What to do? It can be argued, modeled or demonstrated, but never proven. This is because for all of our effort, there is no single thing we can point to which could not happen in some other way. There is no "smoking gun" so to speak.The same holds true for conspiracy advocates. One can argue, demonstrate ( within reason) or model the situation, but it is not proof and would not bear the test in a court of law.
Still, we keep turning over stones so to speak because what happened does not seem to have had been inevitable.  It was.. Perhaps one day, the stone someone turns over will be the Rosetta stone.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page