Theories Discussion > General Discussion

Logical analysis of tent cuts

<< < (6/6)

SURI:

--- Quote from: GlennM on February 02, 2025, 06:40:57 AM ---There is simply no reason for it to be murder. There simply was a reason for them to leave the tent. Prove it and you win the Dyatlov Pass Incident lifetime achievement award. Many of us try, but we are blocked by the same reality. Whatever motivated them to leave was a transient effect, lost to time. What to do? It can be argued, modeled or demonstrated, but never proven. This is because for all of our effort, there is no single thing we can point to which could not happen in some other way. There is no "smoking gun" so to speak.The same holds true for conspiracy advocates. One can argue, demonstrate ( within reason) or model the situation, but it is not proof and would not bear the test in a court of law.
Still, we keep turning over stones so to speak because what happened does not seem to have had been inevitable.  It was.. Perhaps one day, the stone someone turns over will be the Rosetta stone.

--- End quote ---

You can't prove something if the investigation is hiding something. There are only certain indications. There are many contradictory statements. In the previous thread, the combat leaflet seemed strange to you, you had a lot of questions about it, and suddenly, within a moment, you know that everything is fine with it.  What a divided mindset.

GlennM:
Unfortunately, your comment crossed a boundary. You have written an ad hominum response. This is a form of logical fallacy where a person unable to defend a point of view attacks the character of the opposition. If you choose to do this to others in the forum, you will surely find it a lonely place. We are done.

SURI:

--- Quote from: Ziljoe on February 02, 2025, 02:28:53 AM ---
--- Quote from: SURI on February 02, 2025, 01:40:08 AM ---I also have an interesting article that explains how the injuries could have occurred.

https://www.kp.ru/daily/26311.5/3189866/

--- End quote ---

The lack of further and more severe injuries that could occur in a fight to the death  to the hikers kind of rules out any sort of fight. There should be broken hands, ripped off fingernails , broken jaws , Bite marks , scratches, ripped pockets , marks on the bodies where clothing was pulled into the skin .

--- End quote ---

That would be in case they fought with strangers. Here it was supposed to look at least somewhat like a believable accident or freezing, which it ultimately succeeded in, almost everyone believes it.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page