Theories Discussion > General Discussion

Inconsistencies in photos of finding the tent

<< < (12/12)

Ziljoe:

--- Quote from: RMK on February 14, 2025, 03:45:05 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ziljoe on February 11, 2025, 04:29:08 AM --- Again it is a concern to me that the case files are in English and there is no Russian copies of the transcript. This can raise a question mark over its authenticity.

--- End quote ---


Huh?  Do you mean on this page, https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-388-392 ?  You need only click on the little Russian flag icons on that page to see what appear to be the original Russian-language documents.

--- End quote ---

@ RMK Sorry yes, that page.

On the photos , below the pictures, it is written in English on the documents. Although this may have been translated by some other person , they are obviously not original case file documents, that means the typing style of the document and they lay out. It's the same with the combat leafy although there's what looks like the original combat leaflet in Russian and a copy with English. They both have the red number written in the top right of the case file but not in the photos of the tent case file. The number is there in a couple of photos but it's not in red.

It just means they are photos of what I assume we're in part original documents. If some documents are not orgional , how do we know any of them are or haven't been tampered with. Perhaps the original documents exist somewhere but in this instance we have to believe the person that edited these photos did so accurately but who did it in the first place and why change an orgional document? 

Edit/ to add, we now have questions arising about the authenticity of the autopsy reports and the typewriter used along with the medical terminology.

Also, there is questions regarding some of the entries in the history of Zolotaryov's life and military files . There are suspicions that they were edited at some point. Whether that was pre or post incident is unknown. We have inconsistencies everywhere, which is a frustration and one fake entry pre or post release of the documents would obviously make it impossible to understand what occured.

Sometimes I think this case has been deliberately enhanced by those that intially released it to the public for some self indulgent puzzle or self serving story for the sake of entertainment. ( I do not mean anyone here or current Investigators).   

GlennM:
Nature was and still is unaffected by all the manmade drama.  This quest to celebrate cleverness in sleuthing, discredit the critics, obfuscate  the the facts and make money in some way, shape or form tells us more about ourselves than those hikers we discuss.

The whole point to the DPI is not so much to understand the past, but to prevent it happening again in the future. It is practically moot. In today's world,  we have communication and survival gear far beyond what was available then. When a person can blog from Everest, it is an indication of what I mean. There are really only two other meaningful considerations in the investigation as a tool for,wisdom. The first is the weather which can be predicted but not controlled. The second is common sense, which unfortunately is not so common.

To become more common sensible, we examine the DPI to weigh the pros and cons of their experience and actions. Finally, because of our limitations as humans, the best we can ever do in this context is to understand the " how" of things, never the "why". It is the "why" that sells books, truth or fiction, it matters not.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page