Theories Discussion > General Discussion

a version that explains ALL the facts

<< < (2/19) > >>

GlennM:
A gentle reminder, "Plausibility does not substitute for proof."

Ziljoe:
On the Author’s Background and Authority

Before accepting any reconstruction of the Dyatlov Pass incident, it’s reasonable to ask a basic question: who is the author, and what qualifies him to reinterpret the case? In this instance, the answers are unclear. The writer presents himself as someone who has “studied the case for years,” yet there is no trace of him in any recognised Dyatlov research circles, no publications in historical or forensic journals, no interviews, no archival work, and no involvement with the Dyatlov Foundation or the Russian researchers who have spent decades with the primary materials. His name does not appear in academic literature, investigative reporting, or the glasnost‑era releases that brought the case back into public view.

The only place his work appears is on a self‑publishing platform used primarily for fiction, speculative narratives, and amateur investigations. That doesn’t disqualify him — but it does mean his authority rests entirely on the accuracy of his claims. And when the central pillars of his argument depend on misunderstandings of weapon systems, incorrect timelines, and events that contradict the case file, it raises a fair question about whether he is reconstructing history or constructing a dramatic story. A theory can be imaginative, but imagination is not the same as evidence. When an author’s background is opaque and the factual foundation is unstable, scrutiny isn’t hostility — it’s basic due diligence.

sanmigel:

--- Quote from: Ziljoe on March 14, 2026, 05:50:04 PM --- who is the author, and what qualifies him to reinterpret the case?

--- End quote ---
It doesn't matter who, it's important what you say.
Could the C-75 have deliberately fired at the mountain? ok. the rocket could have fallen in an emergency situation.
They could have been missiles and not the S-75. It could have been in ANOTHER place, but in the same area. What does this change for the version? Nothing. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. IT ALSO WORKS THE SAME WAY.

sanmigel:

--- Quote from: GlennM on March 14, 2026, 05:27:49 PM ---A gentle reminder, "Plausibility does not substitute for proof."

--- End quote ---
Could it be? IT COULD HAVE. Do you think otherwise? PROVE the opposite.

sanmigel:
There is no need to rely on the personality of the author or the properties of the C-75. See the main thing. For 67 years, everyone has been hammering on the same night on February 1-2. The tourists were last seen on January 28 and found on February 26. AND NO ONE CAN RELIABLY SAY what happened to them during this month.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page