Theories Discussion > Yeti / Snowman

The Yeti/ Bigfoot phenomenon

<< < (2/3) > >>

nina.bird007:

I do not believe in Bigfoot. This is the same fantastic personality as Batman.

Nigel Evans:
It's interesting, there's no evidence that stands objective scrutiny but thousands of reports that have to be taken on trust (photographs, videos, eye witness accounts, Vladimir Putin claims to have seen one!)

If these creatures exist then they must die accidental deaths, fall in rivers and drown etc. Where are the bodies? Not one ever.

sarapuk:

--- Quote from: Nigel Evans on March 18, 2019, 09:21:42 AM ---It's interesting, there's no evidence that stands objective scrutiny but thousands of reports that have to be taken on trust (photographs, videos, eye witness accounts, Vladimir Putin claims to have seen one!)

If these creatures exist then they must die accidental deaths, fall in rivers and drown etc. Where are the bodies? Not one ever.

--- End quote ---

Yes thousands of reports in history. Thats an awful lot of sightings and experiences for a supposedly mythical creature. I think the alleged Vladimir Putin sighting was an April Fools Joke. Yes where are the bodies of dead Yeti / Bigfoot. There are 2 million wild Deer in Britain but how often are they seen, apart from those in Parkland settings.

vdersik:
When it's the time for yeti, it is relatively easy to exclude this hominide as a suspected factor. These procedures which are about to accuse yeti of the crime must be done on the crime scene, in real time and real place. So far in 1950's some crucial evidences was not taken, the reason is unknown. Yeti existence on the crime scene and its involvement could be proven by some of these procedures/evidences>
1. Footprints around the scene which were not recorded.
2. Evidence of yeti existences in that mountain Kholat Syakhl do not exist. Mansi people nothing had seen.
3. According to biology researchers and scientists yeti does not exists.

- on the crime scene must be collected hair, nails, samples from the wounds MUST be collected, analyzed in laboratory, and DNA profiling and sequencing must be done, if once strange DNA is proven , that fact can be the leading fact in the investigation
- branches that were broken must be examined in detail, were they broken by human leg while climbing or something else (maybe bear or yeti) broke the branches, analyze their size, estimate, could they be broken by a human leg? was any bear capable of breaking them ? Analyze their composition   here physics must give the answers

I think it is easy to know and exclude this creature involvement but here in this case the investigation was done incorrectly! Or we do not now all the information about that case

Star man:

--- Quote from: vdersik on July 09, 2019, 07:17:48 AM ---When it's the time for yeti, it is relatively easy to exclude this hominide as a suspected factor. These procedures which are about to accuse yeti of the crime must be done on the crime scene, in real time and real place. So far in 1950's some crucial evidences was not taken, the reason is unknown. Yeti existence on the crime scene and its involvement could be proven by some of these procedures/evidences>
1. Footprints around the scene which were not recorded.

. The interring thing is that the heavier and deeper the foot print the more chance it has of being covered up.  Only the lighter prints which stand above the layer of snow that has been blown away remains.

2. Evidence of yeti existences in that mountain Kholat Syakhl do not exist. Mansi people nothing had seen.
3. According to biology researchers and scientists yeti does not exists.

- on the crime scene must be collected hair, nails, samples from the wounds MUST be collected, analyzed in laboratory, and DNA profiling and sequencing must be done, if once strange DNA is proven , that fact can be the leading fact in the investigation
- branches that were broken must be examined in detail, were they broken by human leg while climbing or something else (maybe bear or yeti) broke the branches, analyze their size, estimate, could they be broken by a human leg? was any bear capable of breaking them ? Analyze their composition   here physics must give the answers

I think it is easy to know and exclude this creature involvement but here in this case the investigation was done incorrectly! Or we do not now all the information about that case

--- End quote ---

The scene unfortunately was not preserved and there is little substantial evidence to support any of the theories.  On this basis you can only rule out the yeti if it is your starting assumption.

Regards

Star man

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page