Theories Discussion > General Discussion

no mystery here

<< < (2/2)

GlennM:
...and if a tree fell on them, how interesting that the stove, or vent pipe showed no crushing.

Tony:

--- Quote from: David Harper on January 05, 2022, 10:24:47 AM --- The camping stove filled the tent with smoke.  They panicked and left in a blizzard. Period. Anyone who doesn't think so is a conspiracy idiot.

--- End quote ---

Ah, the old Lemmino stove theory. The stove was never used that night. This is heavily documented in the case files. When searchers showed up the stove was found disassembled and in it's case. Why they didn't use it is a mystery but it doesn't change the fact that there isn't an ounce of evidence to show that it was used on that particular night. The tent never filled with smoke. Anyone who thinks so has never read the case files. You don't have to be a "conspiracy idiot" to disagree with this one.

Not to mention, you'd have to be some kind of rube to destroy your only shelter and walk a mile in sub zero temperatures in socks and no coat over a bunch of smoke. Just open the entrance.

ElizabethHarris:
Tony, thank you for the mid-morning chuckle. I just put down a book last night that spends nearly 200 pages explaining how things happened due to the stove smoking them out of the tent. Can you imagine writing an entire book about something without knowing even the basic facts of the case?? I forget the title but it's something about "A New Theory." Yeah, it's never been mentioned as a theory before because everyone knows it is not what happened. bang1

Manti:
I have not heard of that book but it might be that it was written before the case files made it to the public domain?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page