And here is an ugly and not innocent story. At the 11th line " Relation to the accused:
", none of the friends and relatives of the victims answered anything. We can imagine a surprise: "But they are not the accused, they are the victims!
" and junior prosecutor Tempalov, embarrassed: "Yes, yes, of course we know, forget it, let's move on..." But some witnesses gave an answer: "Relation to the accused: Stranger
" or "Relation to the accused: no
"... And these ones, they gave consent to that ugliness. As we can read here:https://dyatlovpass.com/resources/340/gallery/Dyatlov-pass-case-files-263.jpg
There was no room for victims in the Soviet Union (and the authorities even attempted to dump the hikers in a common grave), only room for accused people. Probably, most of individuals were more decent than the regime, but some of them had no difficulty to equal its ugliness. The few ones who answered the 11th question, they all belong to the underworld, don't they? Because none of the ones who kept silent at the 11th line was jailed or sent to Gulag
. So, what pushed the ugly ones to consent to "the accused" ?
And it could be a magnificient title for a novel or a movie:
- The Eleventh line -
And may be, the failure to reach the truth about the dead hikers is all contained is these words: Relation to the accused
, which all witnesses had to hear and to deal with. Because "the accused" had already been found and processed by the regime. Relation to the accused
and unknown compelling force
, it is the same ugliness... When "Relation to the accused
" looks into the mirror, it sees "Unknown compelling force
". "Unknown compelling force
" which is itself a sadistic, pervert and hypocritical expression, and should be unveiled and revealed in its true face of "Our compelling force". Your relation to the accused, our compelling force.This 11th line is by default intimidation and witness tampering, it ruins the credibility of all the investigation
And here "intimidation and witness tampering" is absolutely established and irrefutable. If we want to be serious, the all case is rotten and truth is forever lost. If we want to be serious, we have to exclude all testimonies as not reliable.
And write a story based on the remaining material...