However, it would be right and appropriate for experts to say what they agree with and what they do not agree with, and of course to justify this.
This is what I expect as well. I am bewildered how the so called experts want to diminish other people's work. Not all of them though. This is how you can tell who really wants to learn the truth. If the case is unsolved one has to be open for new interpretation of the facts. BTW I highly respected researcher Alekseenkov who goes to the pass for the last 10 years and who Borzenkov, I am sure, can not brush away without a second thought reached out with unsolicited feedback about the book. He is a really deep into the case, well respected from the whole Russian circle of researchers.
"Read your e-book. Cool! So much information!
And the theory is on the level of a Newton's binomial theorem
- Alexander (Shura) Alekseenkov, researcher
"Приобрёл вашу электронную книгу. Круто! Столько материала обработано!
И версия из разряда бином Ньютона. Впечатляет!
— Александр (Шура) Алексеенков, исследователь
On this year annual conference in Yekaterinburg Alekseenkov made public the results of his measurements on the pass which directly confirm our theoryhttps://dyatlovpass.com/1079#new-magnetic
By the way, I rated your book with the highest possible rating on Amazon.