Theories Discussion > General Discussion

So here was the situation

(1/5) > >>

GlennM:
We have nine chums and a friendly outsider, all with little money and slightly more time. They were earning a master of sport certification for either prestige, finamcial gain or both. They took well worn equipment to a rough landscape in harsh conditions. Although advised against it, they proceeded to attempt to fulfill the requirements for certification. Beaten back a day by the weather, they determined not to be pushed back twice. They were expected home without undue delay. They made slight progress, but it was progress none the less. Nature turned against them, first by a collapse of snow on their pitched tent and again by a collapsed bank of snow overhanging a stream bed. Each one in their own turn became progressively weaker and incapacitated by numbing cold, physical injuries or both. They could not keep,warm in a forest and they could not keep warm in their tent. There was food in the tent. It was a sufficient reason to try to return. Nature is indifferent.

At the heart of it all is the yoithful belief in invincibility and a better than average chance they could succeed. Nature is indifferent. In Darwinian terms, when the non living world changes, the living world adapts or dies. Survival of the fittest can also involve luck, or the lack thereof. This is a human misadventure uncomplicated by human or animal malefactors.

SURI:
Reality suggests that there were two separate subgroups on the scene at the time of the incident, as evidenced by the picture of the overall scene and the different injuries (cause of death) for each. The search also confirmed the creation of two subgroups, when one was found first and the other after a longer period of time. There is also the leaflet Evening Otorten. Here too, it is possible to notice that the division of the group is indicated between the lines. So it cannot be said that there were not two separate subgroups on the scene. The question is rather why this was the case.

1st subgroup (slope, cedar)
was scattered over a larger area (undeniable) because it had to defend itself. Their movement was subsequently restricted. The cause of their injuries was the violent restriction of movement, which then resulted in the cause of death – freezing.

The 2nd subgroup (ravine 4) had unrestricted movement in all three locations (slope, cedar, ravine). No one prevented them from doing anything, they could work with clothes by the fire, build a den. Their activity ended when they fell in pairs into a ravine (Tibo with Dubinina + Zolotaryov with Kolevatov), ​​where they succumbed to their injuries.

Axelrod:
It will be very interesting to hear a third opinion.

SURI:
And if someone escapes you, even just by a little, you will take revenge.

Slobodin – cracked skull
Kolmogorova – red bruise on waist
Krivonischenko – burned leg

SURI:
It is clear that this was not to be made public, so an unknown compelling force was chosen. The culprits were punished and the investigation could therefore be closed.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page