Theories Discussion > General Discussion

Why not go back inside?

<< < (12/12)

Ziljoe:

--- Quote from: sarapuk on November 09, 2025, 04:46:29 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ziljoe on November 03, 2025, 07:27:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: sarapuk on November 03, 2025, 03:11:31 PM ---

But the avalanche theory has been scrutinised intensively over the years, and the general consensus is that it was not an avalanche that caused the Dyatlov group to flee their tent without proper clothing and other equipment.

--- End quote ---

I do not think that is the general consensus, nor do I think the avalanche theory has been intensively scrutinized.

--- End quote ---

Going back over the years and not just on this site, there is a general feeling that the slope was not conducive to an avalanche and certainly not one that would cause an event such as happened. There has been a lot of effort put in by various researchers regarding the avalanche theory.

--- End quote ---

There is certainly a lot of opinion about all theories, there is a general feeling that aliens, big foot and demons don't exist. Regarding an avalanche, everyone has a different interpretation of what is meant by an avalanche at the tent and the context . I hope to get to some of that later by looking at the broader picture.

Unfortunately, a lot of professionals avoid this mystery like the plague .

Ziljoe:

--- Quote from: sarapuk on November 09, 2025, 04:58:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ziljoe on November 05, 2025, 11:00:13 PM ---
--- Quote from: ilahiyol on November 05, 2025, 09:24:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ziljoe on November 03, 2025, 07:27:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: sarapuk on November 03, 2025, 03:11:31 PM ---

But the avalanche theory has been scrutinised intensively over the years, and the general consensus is that it was not an avalanche that caused the Dyatlov group to flee their tent without proper clothing and other equipment.

--- End quote ---

I do not think that is the general consensus, nor do I think the avalanche theory has been intensively scrutinized.

--- End quote ---
Just one look at the tent and you'll immediately realize there's no avalanche or snowslide there. Even discussing it is a waste of time.

--- End quote ---

They should hire you for your evaluation skills from photos of over 60 years ago. You would be a wealthy person . Expert's and researchers around the world have spent many resources on trying to establish an avalanche.

--- End quote ---


Experts and researchers ! Sometimes people do that sort of thing in order to divert attention away from what may really have happened. Unknown compelling force.

--- End quote ---

Why try to divert attention away from the statement that was given in the case files? They didn't know why they left the tent , so it's unknown what it was that drove them out of the tent and down the slope . It's all about the interpretation I guess. If they wanted to cover anything up they could have done so.

sarapuk:

--- Quote from: Ziljoe on November 09, 2025, 06:31:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: sarapuk on November 09, 2025, 04:46:29 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ziljoe on November 03, 2025, 07:27:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: sarapuk on November 03, 2025, 03:11:31 PM ---

But the avalanche theory has been scrutinised intensively over the years, and the general consensus is that it was not an avalanche that caused the Dyatlov group to flee their tent without proper clothing and other equipment.

--- End quote ---

I do not think that is the general consensus, nor do I think the avalanche theory has been intensively scrutinized.

--- End quote ---

Going back over the years and not just on this site, there is a general feeling that the slope was not conducive to an avalanche and certainly not one that would cause an event such as happened. There has been a lot of effort put in by various researchers regarding the avalanche theory.

--- End quote ---

There is certainly a lot of opinion about all theories, there is a general feeling that aliens, big foot and demons don't exist. Regarding an avalanche, everyone has a different interpretation of what is meant by an avalanche at the tent and the context . I hope to get to some of that later by looking at the broader picture.

Unfortunately, a lot of professionals avoid this mystery like the plague .

--- End quote ---


These days, with the explosion of social media and related platforms, more and more interest is being shown in the paranormal. I'm not saying that the Dyatlov mystery is paranormal, but it can not be ruled out. A lot of professionals are also drawn to this mystery. I'm sure Teddy would agree.


sarapuk:

--- Quote from: Ziljoe on November 09, 2025, 06:38:48 PM ---
--- Quote from: sarapuk on November 09, 2025, 04:58:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ziljoe on November 05, 2025, 11:00:13 PM ---
--- Quote from: ilahiyol on November 05, 2025, 09:24:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: Ziljoe on November 03, 2025, 07:27:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: sarapuk on November 03, 2025, 03:11:31 PM ---

But the avalanche theory has been scrutinised intensively over the years, and the general consensus is that it was not an avalanche that caused the Dyatlov group to flee their tent without proper clothing and other equipment.




--- End quote ---

I do not think that is the general consensus, nor do I think the avalanche theory has been intensively scrutinized.

--- End quote ---
Just one look at the tent and you'll immediately realize there's no avalanche or snowslide there. Even discussing it is a waste of time.

--- End quote ---

They should hire you for your evaluation skills from photos of over 60 years ago. You would be a wealthy person . Expert's and researchers around the world have spent many resources on trying to establish an avalanche.

--- End quote ---


Experts and researchers ! Sometimes people do that sort of thing in order to divert attention away from what may really have happened. Unknown compelling force.

--- End quote ---

Why try to divert attention away from the statement that was given in the case files? They didn't know why they left the tent , so it's unknown what it was that drove them out of the tent and down the slope . It's all about the interpretation I guess. If they wanted to cover anything up they could have done so.

--- End quote ---

Ulterior motives. For instance, if a paranormal event was suspected, maybe the authorities wouldn't want to go down that road, so to speak. Or maybe they knew it was a paranormal event and therefore covered it up. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version