Theories Discussion > The stove

Carbon monoxide posoning

<< < (4/7) > >>

sarapuk:

--- Quote from: Dona on April 12, 2021, 04:59:12 PM ---.
3. It is not the task of the forum evaluate this design and application, because we should only deal with what happened to Dyatlov's group, not analyze the equipment.

Says who? You?

--- End quote ---

What are you talking about. The whole point of a Forum like this is to analyse whatever we can.

Dona:
Agreed..  But..That wasnt me saying that.. I was quoting WAB who rudely said that to the newbie..

sarapuk:

--- Quote from: Dona on April 13, 2021, 01:23:32 PM ---Agreed..  But..That wasnt me saying that.. I was quoting WAB who rudely said that to the newbie..

--- End quote ---

Well I believe analysis is important for anything to do with this Mystery.

Dona:
I agree..



Farewell, Alo.. "We hardly knew ye"

Tsk.

WAB:

--- Quote from: Dona on April 12, 2021, 04:59:12 PM ---.
3. It is not the task of the forum evaluate this design and application, because we should only deal with what happened to Dyatlov's group, not analyze the equipment.
==============================
Says who? You?

--- End quote ---

Yes, I said that.
What is the essence of the complaint?
What is said here that is wrong?
Could you please state it point by point?
They had this particular stove, so there is no point in discussing others. Even if they were better than this one.
I could say a lot of things that were better than theirs, but we shouldn't go off topic.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version