All theories posted here a very compelling and have given me additional substance to chew on. In the book "The Death of Nine" Mrs or Miss Anderson, who worked as a cryptologic for the US Air Force, makes some very compelling arguments on a number of subjects such as, the tourist speed of decent to the trees, and a comparison to what was written in a diary concerning the progress they were making in the snow single file heading toward the mountains. There are many more eye brow lifting scenarios she presents at first seem far fetched, but , It did get me to reconsider my hard line belief that this was a natural disaster. Now I have forced myself to believe what is in the autopsies is true and not a cover up, if it were a cover up the autopsies would read ,all died of hypothermia and snow pack compression for the broken bones and the running water aiding to the decay of the bodies in the stream and the burn marks speak for themselves in trying to stay warm...With over 80 injuries collectively on the bodies and where they were found this seems to be more consistent to the autopsy reports which suggests human intervention. Hypothetically, in mathematics, if I multiply one times zero equal one and build upon that more equations, when it came to the proof, it would be dismissed single handedly. The same goes for the autopsy reports, they are the proof. Lastly Mrs.or Miss Anderson goes into motive, but, that's for you to read which I highly recommend. When emotions are taken out of an investigation, logic has a place to lay a foundation...Thanks for reading.