Dyatlov Pass Forum
Theories Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: Axelrod on March 01, 2025, 04:12:18 AM
-
Here I will try not just to write some thoughts, but to combine evidence from the criminal case and intereviews.
Karelin witness testomony:
(February 28) This day four bodies were found: Kolmogorovа, Dyatlov, Krivonischenko and Doroshenko, the latter we first confused with Zolotaryov, because his face was covered with snow, and only later we identified the fourth body as Doroshenko.
(February 28) The next day the tent of the Dyatlov group was dismantled and three bodies were taken to the pass.
Radiogram of Maslennokov (Sheet 160): 28.2 1707 (To Sulman)
Couldn't get in touch with Akselrod, from him that is Akselrod a helicopter flew off. The search has not given anything yet. It was possible to find traces of 8-9 people from the tent about 1 km down the slope, further the traces were lost. One person was wearing boots, the rest in socks and barefoot. Further down the slope the snow is very deep and investigation of the tent did reveal anything. Dogs today could not do anything, the snow was deep. 3 bodies were transported to the heli pad. The fourth will be picked up tomorrow his face - completely unrecognizable therefore there is an opinion that this is Doroshenko and not Zolotaryov. They are both the biggest guys. We examined the place of the tent and made a report, the items were let down to the heli pad. They will be sent to you in the tent there were 10 sets of sheets 8 pairs of boots 9 backpacks, all the personal belongings of the victims, supplies for for 2-3 days, the remaining products for 8 days were left in the cache site in the upper sources of Auspiya river the whole group was together. Why did the entire group half-dressed abandoned the tent was not possible to establish completely incomprehensible. Tomorrow we will probe to look for people in a section of deep snow in the size of 150 meters to five hundred about one kilometer below the tent. Hikers belongings are ready to be transported you need send a helicopter for them.
Witness testimony of Sogrin (about March 1): Sheet 332:
On the first of March I, Akselrod, Tipikin, Ivanov L. N. were dropped at the scene of the accident. We were greeted by a large group of people tightly wrapped in and wearing ski caps. The wind blew snow in the face and tried to throw you off the plateau. Quickly loaded into the helicopter Dyatlov group belongings and several people. Behind the large cliff lay 3 bodies already pulled up to the helipad. Despite the bad weather weather went on a search.
Questions to Tipikin (he arriver together with Axelrod. Sogrin and Ivanov):
[T.]: During the flight to the pass on March 1, 1959, we met prosecutor L.N. Ivanov. The time of the flight passed unnoticed in conversation. The topic of discussion, of course, was one.
I did not pay attention to what cargo was transported on this flight. And was there any cargo at all? The fact that they were carrying food, that's for sure. They were already in use in the evening.
12. Did you load the dead people's belongings and tent into the helicopter upon arrival? Did anyone fly away from the pass in this helicopter?
[T.]: As far as I remember, we didn't load anything into the helicopter. Upon arrival at the pass, we immediately headed to Dyatlov's tent, and from there down to the cedar. And the bodies of Krivonischenko and Doroshenko, already harnessed to the sleds, climbed up to the pass. Thus, we simply didn't have time, or need, to observe the helicopter.
13. First impressions of the pass: who did you talk to, what did you hear, what did you do? Did you talk to Maslennikov, investigator Ivanov, journalist Yarov? How did the search go in general? What did you find during your participation?
[T.]: In the very first hours of arriving at the pass, I joined Akselrod's group in the work of lifting the bodies of Doroshenko and Krivonischenko to the pass. These are my first impressions. I did not have any private "face-to-face" conversations with Maslennikov and Ivanov, and I had no idea who Yarovoy was and had nothing to talk about with him.
14. Who lifted the 4th body – Georgy Krivonischenko?
[T.]: The bodies of Krivonischenko and Doroshenko were lifted to the pass at the same time on sleds in two groups of 5-6 people. I ended up in the "Krivonischenko lifting group". I remember well that the weather was beautiful with a slight frost.
Interview with Koptelov (he was together with Sharavin):
https://dyatlovpass.com/koptelov-2008?rbid=18461
KOPTELOV: we were busy delivering corpses to the pass.
The five people who were found. At the pass, they said, there will be a helicopter that will pick up the corpses and take us back. The helicopter arrived and took all the corpses, but they didn’t take us that day. We flew out the next day. (i.e. March 4)
N: You flew away and never went back?
K: Yes, we were already in Sverdlovsk on March 5th.
https://lenta.ru/news/2020/07/11/turist/The tourist who discovered the tent of the missing Dyatlov group has died:
Mikhail Sharavin died in Yekaterinburg at the age of 85. In 1959, he was the first to discover the empty tent of tourists from the Dyatlov group. The head of the Dyatlov Foundation, Yuri Kuntsevich, reported this to the Ura.ru portal.
<span>He noted that former tourist Sharavin died on July 8. Due to the coronavirus, few people attended his farewell ceremony. His relatives have not yet informed the foundation about the place of burial.
Rustem Slobodon was found only March 5. What was a fifth body before SLobodin.
I suppose in was recognizef Semyon ZOlotarqov which wat taken by helicopter on March 1.
Question 12. Did you load the dead people's belongings and tent into the helicopter upon arrival? Did anyone fly away from the pass in this helicopter?
[TIPIKIN.]: As far as I remember, we didn't load anything into the helicopter. Upon arrival at the pass, we immediately headed to Dyatlov's tent, and from there down to the cedar. And the bodies of Krivonischenko and Doroshenko, already harnessed to the sleds, climbed up to the pass. Thus, we simply didn't have time, or need, to observe the helicopter.
-
If there were 10 dead tourists, where did the 10th backpack go?
-
If there were 10 dead tourists, where did the 10th backpack go?
And who knows better about these backpacks, you in Australia, or my uncle, who was loading these backpacks into the helicopter 66 years ago?
-
If there were 10 dead tourists, where did the 10th backpack go?
And who knows better about these backpacks, you in Australia, or my uncle, who was loading these backpacks into the helicopter 66 years ago?
Suri is asking a question. What has Australia got to do with is Yout reply Axelrod?
What does your uncle know? Please share facts Axelrod ..
-
It seems that the rescue/recovery teams were as confused about the hikers as are we. The uncle did honorable work in harsh conditions. He too performed his labors without solving a problem. He was also smart enough to do his service without making additional trouble. A good man.
-
3 + 3 + 2 + 1 takes pictures
(https://i.ibb.co/G40KP4PB/1000033468.jpg) (https://ibb.co/Nds8YdYQ)
-
From the video The mystery of the blurred photo, or “the body of an unknown person”. A break in the search at the pass (May 29, 2022):
[SAZONOVA]: Hello, it’s me again! And today I want to talk to you about the photograph of an unknown corpse. Why? Because in fact, if you and I admit that this photograph is really related to our history, then 99% of the versions should simply fall away. (…)
(https://i.ibb.co/k6SmbzSb/vietnamka-x.jpg) (https://ibb.co/Pz6DXJ6X)
In my video about Yarovoy and Ivanov’s archive, I told the story of how this photograph came to light in the first place. And therefore, of course, we have no guarantee that she is directly connected with this case. Let's start reasoning. We have no evidence of this, but we also have no evidence of the opposite. In fact, Lev Ivanov did not handle as many cases as it seems to us now. How these overloaded investigators and prosecutors are painted to us. We know for sure, it flashed somewhere in one of the reports, in one of the archival notes, that in 1959 Ivanov handled only 4 cases. At the same time, two of them are known to us – the death of the Dyatlov group, and the second case, when in January 1959 the body of a girl was found on the shore of a lake in Sverdlovsk. Moreover, he handled it for a long time, 10 or 11 months. They simply could not identify her and solve this case for a very long time. Two more cases are unknown to us. However, you and I know that Ivanov's archive contains tapes of his other cases.
(https://i.ibb.co/n83TfNCG/foto-unknown.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
I want to say right away that these films do not have a frame with our smeared body. This photo is not from those films. If we look at them, then there is indeed one case, also in winter. We do not know what year it was. It was connected with a fire, and in some such settlement, but this is not a stone building… Maybe these are some outskirts of Sverdlovsk. This is a big fire, everything is dirty there, there is soot, there are a lot of people. There will be bodies, but they are not in clean underwear. These are dressed people, pulled out of the fire. This is clearly not that photograph, not that style. Even if we admit that we do not have all of Ivanov's films.
Therefore, we have no evidence that it is from another case. Let's now try to reason. What can we say, looking at this photo? Here, of course, Ivanov's inscription, which is on the back of the photo, plays a huge role.
(https://i.ibb.co/nqwphfcv/back-body.jpg) (https://ibb.co/Y4Ngv8kM)
The body after it was dug out of the snow.
We understand for sure that we are not talking about just some body that was dug out of the snow. In fact, we also understand that if this is a death somewhere in the city, or the same fire, then no one buried these bodies there first, so that later they would have to be dug out!
The second point is the degree to which he is dressed. Here, of course, looking at this photo, you understand that there is a clear connection with the Dyatlov group.
I understand that a person could have jumped out of the fire there at night undressed, but like this, so that he would have been walking around somewhere in these underpants, and then he would have been covered in snow, so that he would have to be dug out there? After all, the case of the Dyatlov group is quite unique.
The third is the location. We can again see from the photographs that there are no signs of a settlement. If we look at the snow, there is a certain feeling that this is not urban, this is pure snow. You see small shoots of coniferous trees, and we do not see any trees, bushes or anything else in the background. And this also allows us to think that we are talking about this specific transition zone of the Dyatlov group: first a half-bare slope, then they walked where dwarf trees barely break through, and only then the forest began. When you look at this photograph, there is a feeling that we are talking specifically about crossing a forest zone. If we summarize: the man is dressed like a Dyatlov man. A man who died under the same circumstances. I am inclined to think that if a bird quacks like a duck, the bird has a beak like a duck, then it is a duck.
That's why I think it's highly likely that this photo is related to our topic. Then the question arises: how did they manage to dig up this body without the searchers knowing? How did it go unnoticed? And it seems to me that this question is interesting to us in and of itself. That's why I even included it in the title of the video.
The thing is that there really was a break in the search… In fact, this is where my friendship with Igor Pavlov began. I can't help but talk about him, because he was a wonderful person, one of the best I know who dealt with the Dyatlov Pass topic. No offense to other people. Unfortunately, he has passed away.
Being such a completely inexperienced neophyte on the forum, I was still afraid to argue with anyone there, afraid to write any seditious thoughts. And so I very carefully wrote him a private message: "Hello! tell me, please, I don’t understand the topic well, but I have a feeling.”
(https://i.ibb.co/d0CD1FG2/barto-wall.jpg) (https://ibb.co/4Zvp9zPT)
In short, could Petr Bartolomei be disingenuous when describing his stay at the pass and some circumstances related to it. After that, I received a lot of emoticons from Igor Pavlov and the following answer: “Yes, you know, girl, you got me interested in this question…”
(https://i.ibb.co/9kRBVvfm/igor-pavlov.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
-
My research with corpses. Presumably, Semyon Zolotaryov was performing a special task (for example, tracking the flight of missiles), the other "sherpas" were not in the know.
(https://i.ibb.co/WNh2SCMw/map-77-part.jpg) (https://ibb.co/V01qX6zZ)
1) Zina Kolmogorova was found closest to the tent (February 27). The guys who felt sympathy for her also rushed after her, but they all died.
2) Doroshenko (crossed out on the diagram). Perhaps he was lying on his back.
3) Slobodin (found March 5)
4) Dyatlov (found February 27).
Krivonischenko and Zolotaryov were lying under a cedar, perpendicular to each other. This is how Kopetlov saw them.
(https://i.ibb.co/0yK78qR7/map-koptelov.jpg) (https://ibb.co/B2GpdL5p)
Zolotaryev was lying on his side, but then was turned face down and hidden. Then Doroshenko was found first on the slope (near to ZIna) and dragged under the cedar (so that the bodies would all lie together), but he was placed parallel to Krivonischenko's body and placed on his stomach (it didn't matter how he was placed).
(Another variant is also posssible: Zolotaryov was found near to Zina, and both Yuras ander the cedar.)
On February 27, the helicopter arrived. (Karelin, Atmanaki, etc.). Also Maslennikov.
On February 28, Tempalov and Korotayev arrived. Perhaps, the intern Korotayev was there on February 27, but he got confused, and on February 28, Tempalov arrived. Tempalov was also confused, so Ivanov arrived on March 1.
Three bodies were lifted to the helipad (Kolmogorova, Dyatlov, and Zolotaryov), this was on February 28. Maslennikov writes that Doroshenko remained under the cedar, and at first he "was confused with Zolotaryov." Perhaps he himself got confused about who he saw.
On the morning of March 1, Doroshenko was raised, then Krivonischenko. Student Tipikin was raising Krivonischenko. But Ivanov, who also arrived on March 1, managed to take a photo of Krivonischenko's body near the cedar.
(https://i.ibb.co/N20C3SjV/12-006.jpg) (https://ibb.co/hFG9MfW7)
Krivonischenko was hidden in the snow (to hide the presence of an extra fifth corpse), and then he was dug out of the snow, as written on the back of Ivanov's photo.
While everyone was busy with their own affairs, the state security officers loaded Zolotaryov into a helicopter, along with his things and a tent. Further manipulations with him are unknown, but his mother received a payment for the death of her son in early March.
The helicopter flew away, but at that time Doroshenko's body was pulled up. These 4 bodies (Zina, Igor, both Yura) were taken out by helicopter on March 3, the autopsy of the 4 bodies was on March 4.
Kopetlov and Sharavin flew away on March 4, and on March 5 they were in Sverdlovsk.
Karelin found Slobodin's body on the slope on March 5. His autopsy was on March 8.
Then an unknown man with tattoos was found in a ravine, who was introduced as Alexander Zolotaryov. He is still listed at the autopsy on May 9. There are 2 records of his burial (before May 12 and after May 12).
Are there other options?
====
TRANSLATED FROM: Моё исследование с трупами. Предположительно, Семён Золотарёв выполнял особое задание (например, отслеживание полёта ракет), другие "шерпы" были не в курсе.
1) Зина Колмогорова была обнаружена ближе всех к палатке (27 февраля). Также за ней следом устремились парни, которые испытывали к ней симпатию, но все погибли.
2) Дорошенко (зачёркнут на схеме). Возможно, он лежал на спине.
3) Слободин (найден 5 марта)
4) Дятлов (найден 27 февраля).
Под кедром лежали Кривонищенко и Золотарёв, перпендикулярно друг к другу. Так их увидел Копетлов. Золотарёв лежал на боку, по потом был перевёрнут лицом вниз и спрятан. Потом Дорошенко был найден первым на склоне и перетащен под кедр (чтобы трупы лежали все вместе), но он был положен параллельно с телом Кривонищенко и положен на живот (было неважно, как его положить).
(Другой вариант тоже возможен, Золотарёв найден рядом с Зиной, но транспортиров к кедру, где уже лежали оба Юры).
27 февраля прилетел Вертолёт. (Карелин, Атманаки и др.). Также Маслеников.
28 февраля прилетели Темпалов и Коротаев. Возможно, практикант Коротаев был 27 февраля, но он растерялся, и 28 февраля прилетел Темпалов. Темпалов тоже растерялся,
поэтому 1 марта прилетел Иванов.
Три трупа были подняты на вертолётную площадку (Колмогорова, Дятлов и Золотарёв), это было 28 февраля. Масленников пишет, что Дорошенко остался под кедром, и сначала он «был перепутан с Золотарёвым». Возможно, он сам запутался, кого он видит.
Кривонищенко был спрятан в снегу (чтобы скрыть присутствие лишнего пятого трупа), а затем он был разрыт из снега, как надписано на обороте фото у Иванова.
Утром 1 марта был поднят Дорошенко, потом Кривонищенко. Студент Типикин занимался поднятием Кривонищенко. Но Иванов, который тоже прилетел 1 марта, успел сделать фото трупа Кривонищенко у кедра.
Пока все были занятны своими делами, сотрудники госбезопаснотси погрузили Золотарёва в вертолёт, вместе с вещами и палаткой. Дальнейшие манипуляции с ним неизвестны, но его мать получила выплату за смерть сына в начале марта.
Вертолёт улетел, но в это время был подтянут труп Дорошенко. Эти 4 трупа (Зина, Игорь, Юра, Юра) были вывезены вертолётом 3 марта, вскрытие 4 трупов было 4 марта.
Копетлов и Шаравин улетели 4 марта, и 5 марта они были в Свердловске.
Карелин нашёл тело Слободина на склоне 5 марта. Его вскрытие было 8 марта.
Потом в овраге был найден непонятный человек с татуировками, который был представлен как Александр Золотарёв. Он так и фигурирует при вскрытии 9 мая. Есть 2 свидетельства его похорон (до 12 мая и после 12 мая).
Возможны ли другие варианты?
-
Maya [PISKARYOVA] tells us: To date, Viktor [BOGOMOLOV] is the only witness who took part in Semyon Zolotaryov's funeral. And I decided to call him on January 2, 2014.
[B.]: The coffin was dark, it didn't stand out. There was no photograph on the coffin. Just a lid.
[–] Were there any military personnel present at the funeral?
[B.]: No. There were no military personnel.
[–] Were there any relatives?
[B.]: The only relative was Semyon's mother. When Repyev called me, he told me to look after her. She was in poor physical condition, old. She was very sad.
[–] Were you looking after Semyon Alexeevich's mother? Where was she staying, where did you take her after the funeral?
[B.]: I didn't meet her, I saw her at the cemetery. The sports committee workers met her. They looked after her and took her away from the funeral.
[–] Do you think it was really Semyon Zolotaryov's mother? The thing is that Semyon's relatives on his older sister's side say that none of them were at the funeral. And when they called his mother and sister to Sverdlovsk, they were told that Semyon's body had not been found.
[B.]: I don't know, I think it was Semyon's mother. Zolotaryov was the last one to be buried, after May 12, they said they were waiting for his mother to arrive, they waited a long time for her to arrive. They probably called her earlier, in March or April, when all the bodies had not yet been found… Are you saying that the funeral was staged? Although, in principle, it is possible. You know, the searchers said that many things on the slope were staged.
(https://i.ibb.co/hxhQ1nz4/zol-tomb-old.jpg) (https://ibb.co/rKT8fLrz)
Майя [ПИСКАРЁВА] сообщает нам: На сегодняшний день Виктор [БОГОМОЛОВ] является единственным свидетелем, кто принимал участие в похоронах Семёна Золотарёва. И я решилась позвонить ему 2 января 2014.
[Б.]: Гроб был тёмный, не выделялся. Фотографии на гробе не было. Просто крышка.
[–] Присутствовали ли военные на похоронах?
[Б.]: Нет. Военных никого не было.
[–] Были ли родственники?
[Б.]: Из родственников была только мама Семёна. Когда мне позвонил Репьёв, он сказал, чтобы я присмотрел за ней. Она была в неважном физическом состоянии, старенькая. Очень горевала.
[–] Вы занимались мамой Семёна Алексеевича? Где она остановилась, куда Вы её увезли после похорон?
[Б.]: Я её не встречал, увидел уже на кладбище. Встречали её работники спорткомитета. Они ею и занимались, и увезли её с похорон.
[–] Как Вы думаете, это на самом деле была мама Семёна Золотарёва? Дело в том, что родственники Семёна по линии старшей сестры говорят, что никого из них на похоронах не было. А когда вызывали в Свердловск маму и сестру, но им сказали, что тело Семёна не найдено.
[Б.]: Я не знаю, мне кажется, что это была мама Семёна. Золотарёва хоронили последним из всех, после 12 мая, говорили, что ждут приезда мамы, долго ждали её приезда. Наверно, её раньше вызывали, в марте или апреле, когда все тела ещё были не найдены… Вы хотите сказать, что на похоронах была постановка? Хотя, в принципе, возможно. Знаете, поисковики говорили, что там на склоне многие вещи были постановочными.
-
I feel that the making of second hand claims about persons who did not exist does a disservice to the memory of the dead, their searchers and their chroniclers. There is no evidence for a 10th person. There was no combat. There was no manipulation of corpses.
Good rescue people travelled to a harsh environment with good intentions. There was considerable expense in this rescue/recovery process. There were honest and accurate records made.
An unknown compelling force did not have to affect all at once. It would be enough to distress even just one person and the rest came for rescue. The only thing that would hurt anyone there was the Russian winter. The tourists were outmatched by the conditions.
I consider their downfall caused by disregarding the Forester, disregarding the weather and overestimating their ability to succeed against an indifferent winter. This is hubris. In itself, it is not a crime. People like to test their limits. Youth thinks they are invincible. Only with aches and pains of growing older and seeing your friends sicken and die does mortality become more real. We do not need make believe fictions about extra people, attacks and lures to explain the DPI. We need an understanding that there are limits and common sense at times is not,so common.
-
I disagree that the tourists were overcome by an unknown compelling force. That's just such an abstract term for hidden culprits who, however, have already been sufficiently punished.
But I agree that there weren't 10 of them, see the photo above. How would the 10th person get into the ravine with the other tourists, even though he had not gone with them before?
And Doroshenko on the slope? How could clothes be cut from him without leaving a single piece in the snow, and why would tourists return far back into the ravine?
-
We have Karelin's testimony that on February 28, 3 corpses were lifted up.
These are not his memories, this is his interrogation in 1959.
We also have a telegram from Maslennikov (sheet 160) that 3 corpses were lifted up, excluding Doroshenko, who was initially confused. This confusion is precisely explained by manipulations.
On March 1, Ivanov, Akselrod, Sogrin, and Tipikin arrive to translate.
Tipikin says that he personally lifted Krivonischenko's corpse.
Tipikin played the role of a horse harnessed to a sleigh to lift the sleigh up the mountain.
Tipikin identified Yura Krivonischenko by his face and ears.
This is also confirmed by the fact that on March 1, Ivanov took a photo of a corpse in the forest that looked like Krivonischenko (for some, even this is not obvious).
On the same day, another team of 5-6 people lifted Doroshenko's body.
We have a total of 5 bodies. This is exactly the testimony of the searchers, including Kotpelov and Sharavin.
They helped drag 5 bodies, but they flew away on March 4, and S. Lobodin was found on March 5.
Sharavin confessed before his death.
This mystery is perfectly explained by the fact that Zolotaryov was also found there.
Probably, Doroshenko was lying naked near the cedar (his relationship with Zina had deteriorated, but Zina found another), so Zolotaryov was found next to Zina. But in photographs they are often together.
For some reason, Zolotaryov was taken out secretly, but the search was conducted with the participation of students, \knowing that they would not understand anything. The place on the slope diagram where he was found fourth yard with Zina is crossed out.
I admit that Zolotaryov was taken to Moscow to study the effect of the new substance on the corpse.
How do you explain the situation that Zina was moving alone? The group should not have split up like Yudin.
She definitely moved in a pair of men, and then the jealous ones ran to catch up with them, while they were rivals and moved separately.
The tenth person (Alexander) was not necessarily present on the hike, he could have appeared at the last moment, just as Semyon appeared on the last day, to carry out the task. By the way, Semyon is not mentioned anywhere in the diary during the hike. Therefore, Alexander could also not have been mentioned. He could have been delivered on a sleigh. The group's diary says that the deer did not go further (i.e. they returned), but the man went further.
(https://i.ibb.co/gb3xqK86/map-77-part.jpg) (https://ibb.co/bjPkw9V7)
ORIGINAL:Мы имеем показания Карелина, что 28 февраля наверх было поднято 3 трупа.
Это не его воспоминания, это его допрос в 1959 году.
Также мы имеем телеграмму от Масленникова (лист 160), что наверх было поднято 3 трупа, исключая Дорошенко, который сначала был перепутан . Эта путаница как раз объясняется манипуляциями.
1 марта на перевел прилетают Иванов, Аксельрод, Согрин, Типикин.
Типикин говорит, что он лично поднимал труп Кривонищенко.
Типикин играл роль лошади, запряжённой в сани, чтобы поднят сани в гору.
Типикин определил Юру Кривонищенко по лицу и ушам.
Это также подтверждается тем, что Иванов 1 марта сделал в лесу фото трупа, который похож на Кривонищенко (для кого-то даже это неочевидно).
В этот же день другая команда из 5-6 человек поднимала труп Дорошенко.
Мы имеем сумму 5 трупов. Это как раз показания поисковиков, включая Котпелова и Шаравина.
Они помогали перетаскивать 5 трупов, но они улетели 4 марта, а Слободин был найден 5 марта.
У Шаравина это признание было уже перед самой смертью. Коптелов тоже это сообщает.
Все свидетели сообщают о той картине, о которой я говорю.
Эта загадка прекрасно объясняется тем, что там был найден также Золотарёв.
Наверно, Дорошенко лежал раздетым у кедра (у него испортились отношения с Зиной, но Зина нашла другого), поэтому Золотарёв был найден рядом с Зиной. Но фотографиях они часто находятся вместе.
Почему-то Золотарёв был вывезен тайно, но поиски были проведены с участием студентов, \понмиая, что они ничего не поймут. Место на схеме склона, где он был найден четвёртым ярдом с Зиной, зачёркнуто.
Я допускаю, что Золотарёв был отвезён в Москву для исследования воздействия нового вещества на труп.
Как вы объясняете ситуацию, что Зина перемещалась одна? Группа не должна была разделяться, как Юдин.
Она определённо перемещалась в паре из мужчин, а затем ревнивцы побежали их догонять, при этом они были соперниками и двигались отдельно.
Десятый человек (Александер) не обязательно присутствовал в походе, он мог возникнуть в последний момент, так же как и Семён возник в последний день, для выполнения задания. Кстати, Семён нигде не упоминается в дневнике во время похода. Поэтому Александр тоже мог быть не упомянут. Он мог быть доставлен на санях. В дневнике группы написано, что олени дальше не пошли (т.е. вернулись), а человек пошёл дальше.
-
I have to say that your explanation sounds like complete sci-fi to me.
So no longer Doroshenko on the slope, because it didn't work, so we'll put Zolotaryov there.. Your new photo doesn't work either. How could a frozen Krivonischenko have frozen hands in a different position? First, compare the photos to see that the real photo with Krivonischenko (hands) is the same at the cedar and in the morgue.
-
Now let's go back to comparing the photos in more detail. I chose the photo that is best to compare with.
Let's say that in the new photo, based on the clothes and other details on the side under the hand, it could be Krivonischenko, but how do you explain the different position of the hands, assuming that the body is frozen?
(https://i.ibb.co/NdpBS31Y/1000033499.jpg) (https://ibb.co/dw6YgcbK)
(https://i.ibb.co/210d4L59/1000033475.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
When enlarged and under a magnifying glass, the same mark appears on the left side of the body in both photos. There are visible dots forming a circle. Maybe an imprint of something.
(https://i.ibb.co/wrxtyNTL/1000033527.png) (https://imgbb.com/)
-
All candidates:
(https://i.ibb.co/F4kwbFgK/tri-krivo.jpg) (https://ibb.co/60cPRkgm)
(https://i.ibb.co/7xJhjdsq/morg-krivo.jpg) (https://ibb.co/MyDdZxFm)
Yury K.
(https://i.ibb.co/pBMSsMBZ/morg-doro.jpg) (https://ibb.co/tTv9NvTc)
Yury D.
(https://i.ibb.co/WpcL6BdW/dyatlov-morg.jpg) (https://ibb.co/cXNj12pc)
Igor Dyatlov.
-
Here I see the same mark on the naked body just below the hand in both photos. You can see it clearly in the new picture. I was confused by the hands before, so I didn't pay that much attention.
(https://i.ibb.co/x8zbPpKq/1000033528.jpg) (https://ibb.co/k6qTkRV2)
-
Whatever it is, whether it forms a circle or something else, it's visible in the same place in both photos.
-
Tipikin also says (writes):
...Then he went to show me the way to the cedar. When I came out into a small clearing to the right of the cedar, I saw two bodies lying nearby. I immediately recognized Yura Krivonischenko in the closest one. It was impossible to mistake this because of the amazing shape of his ears. He was lying on his back, face up, practically naked to his underwear. The color of his face and the exposed areas of his legs and arms were somehow unreal: a beautiful chocolate skin color, which the natives of the Mediterranean countries are famous for.
Next to Krivonischenko lay Doroshenko's body (or so we were told), but his face was not visible. Both bodies lay parallel with their feet toward the cedar. I was asked about the position of the bodies relative to the fire. My respected authors of the questions, judge for yourselves: we had just arrived at the pass, and at that moment I had no idea about any fire.
Soon a group of searchers who had arrived earlier came down the slope with a homemade drag, on which they had probably lifted the bodies of Dyatlov and Kolmogorova, packed and loaded Doroshenko's body onto the drag, and dragged it up to the pass. One of the searchers remained below and I heard him grumbling that they (?) could not send a light sled. Then, after some time, Moisei and Sergey came up. Unlike me, they had something to see in the tent, because they were already recognized leaders and knew how to see and read what flew past my attention. Soon they lowered a drag for us and it was our turn to lift Krivonischenko's body up. So Sogrin is right: he saw 3 bodies up there, including Doroshenko, who was lifted before Krivonischenko.
(https://i.ibb.co/cKnGcJhh/krivo-doro.jpg) (https://ibb.co/0pbgjqyy)
ORIGINAL
Тогда он пошёл показывать мне дорогу к кедру. Когда я вышел на небольшую поляну справа от кедра, то увидел два рядом лежащих тела. В ближнем я сразу же узнал Юру Кривонищенко. В этом ошибиться было невозможно из-за удивительной формы его ушей. Он лежал на спине лицом вверх, практически раздетый до белья. Каким-то нереальным был цвет его лица и обнаженных участков ноги и руки: красивый шоколадный цвет кожи, которым славятся коренные жители стран Средиземноморья.
Рядом с Кривонищенко лежало тело Дорошенко (так нам сказали), но лица его не было видно. Оба тела лежали параллельно ногами в сторону кедра. Мне задали вопрос о положении тел относительно костра. Уважаемые мои авторы вопросов, посудите сами: мы только что прилетели на перевал, и ни о каком костре я в тот момент вообще никакого понятия не имел.
Вскоре по склону спустилась группа ранее прилетевших поисковиков с самодельной волокушей, на которой, возможно, они поднимали тела Дятлова и Колмогоровой, упаковали и погрузили на волокушу тело Дорошенко, и потащили вверх на перевал. Один из поисковиков остался внизу и я слышал, как он ворчал, что они никак не могут прислать легкие сани. Потом, через какое-то время подошли Моисей и Сергей. В отличие от меня, им было что посмотреть в палатке, ведь они уже тогда были общепризнанными лидерами и умели видеть и читать то, что пролетало мимо моего внимания. Вскоре нам спустили вниз волокушу и настала наша очередь поднимать наверх тело Кривонищенко. Так что Согрин прав: наверху он видел 3 тела, включая Дорошенко, которого подняли перед Кривонищенко.
-
Sogrin says:
On the first of March I, Akselrod, Tipikin, Ivanov L. N. were dropped at the scene of the accident. We were greeted by a large group of people tightly wrapped in and wearing ski caps. The wind blew snow in the face and tried to throw you off the plateau. Quickly loaded into the helicopter Dyatlov group belongings and several people. Behind the large cliff lay 3 bodies already pulled up to the helipad.
ORIGINAL (Sheet 333): Первого марта я, Аксельрод, Типикин, Иванов Л. Н. были высажены на место аварии. Встретила нас большая группа людей сильно закутанная в подшлемниках. Ветер бросал снег в лицо и пытался сбросить с плато. Быстро погрузили в вертолет вещи Дятлова и нескольких людей. За большим камнем лежало 3 трупа уже вытащенных наверх на вертолетную площадку.
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-330-339?rbid=17743
-
This photo from the website
https://dyatlovpass.com/post-mortem?lid=1&flp=1
it says it's Kolmogorova and Krivonischenko. But I see 3 bodies at this cliff as mentioned above. I marked the hand of the 3rd body in red (right side). It looks like it's the right hand and the body is lying on its stomach. It's not Krivonischenko's hand. His hand is bent close to his head.
(https://i.ibb.co/3yLLCFDc/1000033658.png) (https://ibb.co/Z6kkMgnx)
-
The described picture of events is very similar to the fact that the tenth corpse was really on the pass and was loaded into a helicopter and taken away on March 1, before Doroshenko's corpse was dragged into its place.
Sogrin could not have noticed Doroshenko's corpse at the moment of disembarking from the helicopter, because Tipikin arrived with the same helicopter, then Tipikin went to the tent.
Then Tipikin went from the shawl to the cedar and saw Doroshenko's corpse there, which was raised only after that. This lasted for several hours.
-
According to the photos available at Dyatlovpass.com, two bodies had been found lying next to each other, close to the cedar.
One body has been identified as Yuri Kri: he is visible with a raised underarm.
The other body - found face down - is very probably (95% or more certainty) Yuri Dor., because;
- the body is some 10 - 15 centimeters taller
- the back of his head resembles the shape of the head and placement and shape of ears as visible on Yuri Dor.'s photo below.
(https://i.ibb.co/p6dGSP4L/Yuri-Doroshenko-04.jpg) (https://ibb.co/ZRxt0JcM)
It is quite factual that Yuri Kri and Yuri Dor had been found lying next to each other.
Of course only factual, within a reliability limit of 95 % centainty that is feasible in case no photos of the search party had been composed/manipulated in the dark room during development afterwards.
-
The journalist collective Aleksej Rakitin provide many details about the life of Semyon.
If only 10 % of this information is correct, Semyon has had at least 7 lifes:
- one as soldier in the Red Army during the Great War
- one as surviving the purgaries of the army under rule of Stalin after the Great War (soldiers had encountered too much luxury in the West)
- one as instructor
- one as being allowed to travel without much trouble in Russia
- one as being parachuted in the Dyatlov Group
- one as being accepted within this Dyatlov Group within one or two days
- one as (in name???) found with tatoos on his arm and buried in the grave with a tomb with his name placed on it.
I will not speculate further on the life of Semyon, let him rest in peace.
For discussion I will add that within the Great War, identity change/fraude had been very very easy due to the high casualty rate and the high need of new personel.
The Russian army had been some three times renewed during the Great War by new conscripts and by mixing old groups: identity papers had not been carefully checked during several of these resuffling/renewing.
The first series of Mad Men shows how Don Draper had swapped identy.
Next to this, I would not topple from amasement from my chair in case a local person had joint the group as guide.
This local person - with tatoos on his underarm - and with a headshape similar to Semyon had been found near the stream without eyeballs.
The Dyatlov case is a so-called 'closed-room case', without a way out.
But brief analysis shows that an unnoticed escape is possible from the so-called 'close-room'.
A tenth group member may have comparable easy survived the tragedy of the others by:
1. surviving the cold night in the tent with all the blankets as insulation against the cold and
2 returning in the tracks made the days before, to return to Vizhay and Ivdel.
If these last two conditions are met and if the 10th member had made it during one day to 2nd, this 10th group member had survived the fate of the other nine group members.
Candidates for number 10 may/might be:
- Yuri Yudin
- Semyon
Of course number 10 - local guide/Semyon - may have NOT survived the cold night.
The dead body of Semyon may well have been found elsewhere within the area and transported separately, and unnoticed for the first search party.
-
In support of this theory all that is needed is a tent full of blankets for a cozy night sleep and a trail of footprints made by walking backwards to Vizhay. I prefer the idea of nine hikers being affected by a slab slide at the tent and another at the ravine.
-
@ Glenn and others members
In my contribution above, I have not any factual proof that this has happened in reality, but it had been possible.
Remember: the tent had offered space for 10 group members.
The possible 10th group member my have left with the tenth pair of skis.
This possible 10th group member had travelled on the 10th pair of skis with the 10th rucksack filled with the necessary food and an empty water bottle, some spare clothes and one or tow blankets.
The advantage for this 10th group member is: she/he does not have to trail a track, because the track had been made already by the group one or a few days before.
Only a very experienced guide would have noted that the skipoles had been used in the reversed direction.
This would very probably have been overlooked by students in the first search party.
Within this scenario the possible 10th group member may have left unnoticed by the first search party.
She/he may well have made the hike from the tent site to 2nd within one day, while she/he would not have to make tracks and she/he had carried a rucksack of around 10 - 12 kg instead of 35 kg before.
In my opinion an option that fits within exploring the possibility of a 10th group member.
-
I submit the 10th person was Old Man Winter. He stuck around until Spring.
-
I submit the 10th person was Old Man Winter. He stuck around until Spring.
I think you are right in some ways.
The tenth corpse was taken away immediately with the arrival of spring, on March 1.
The rest of the corpses were taken away later.
-
A contradicion
28.2 (February 28) 1707 (17h07min)
(https://dyatlovpass.com/resources/340/gallery/Dyatlov-pass-case-files-160.jpg)
...Dogs today could not do anything, the snow was deep. Three bodies were transported to the heli pad. The FOURTH will be picked up tomorrow his face - completely unrecognizable therefore there is an opinion that this is Doroshenko and not Zolotaryov. They are both the biggest guys. ...
(https://dyatlovpass.com/resources/340/gallery/7-003.jpg)
The last corpse under cedar
-
In short, corpse of Zolotaryov was loaded into the departing helicopter, and then the body of the raised Doroshenko was put in his place behind the stone (monument), and then Krivonischenko. Zolotaryov's mother was given compensation in early March. It was unclear who was lying in the stream with a tattoo.
Question 12. Upon arrival, did you load the things and tent of the dead into the helicopter? Did anyone fly away from the pass on this helicopter?
[TIPIKIN]: As far as I remember, we did not load anything into the helicopter. Upon arrival at the pass, we immediately headed to Dyatlov's tent, and from there down to the cedar. And we climbed up to the pass already harnessed to the sleds with the bodies of Krivonischenko and Doroshenko. Thus, we simply did not have time to watch the helicopter, and there was no need either.
-
Axelrod:
I understand everyone point of view of 10 bodies....sending photos, I believe "unknown" body was a tagalong, which this particular person knew the outcome of all 9 hikers and succumbed to death....
Thanks
Kathleen D Smith
(https://i.ibb.co/Ng67FG7Q/unknown-body-2025-04-28-7-47-46-PM.png) (https://ibb.co/wZNYd2Y3)
(https://i.ibb.co/8gy48tnq/Slobodin-s-carmera-2025-04-28-7-49-58-PM.png) (https://ibb.co/RTX4HdGf)
-
We all know where the DP9 were buried. It seems like a pretty big oversight about the 10th...unless you consider the DP9 were recovered at times by strangers...and only 9 bodies.
-
From video Туманов: "Группу Дятлова подвергли пыткам!". На самом деле (1 июля 2019)
https://rutube.ru/video/26d10680cec8a58e663569e915f2c05e/
На самом деле. Выпуск от 01.07.2019
Issue July 1, 2019, Part 2
https://youtu.be/P-gOWONXBuk
[–] The program "Actually" is on the air. This is a studio where it is impossible to lie. A shocking turn in the case of the death of students at Dyatlov Pass.
[–] What other signs make you doubt and think that outsiders have been in that area? Tell me.
[–SHARAVIN]: I think that my indirect evidence is based on the fact that the forester guide Pashin behaved very strangely in our presence. We climbed up the remains of a ski track to the edge of the forest, and then the ski track disappeared, and we did not know where to go next. This is where Pashin came into his role. He involuntarily led us to a remnant on the pass, and then began to tell us that the probable further direction of the group's movement could be to the pass, that is, higher up the ridge to Otorten.
[–] So, perhaps he was more informed than you?
[SHARAVIN]: Yes. First of all, he involuntarily turned his back to the stone, and it directed us in the direction in which we went and found the tent. We walked about a kilometer – and we stumbled upon the tent! We take alcohol from the tent, in the evening with the guys we offer to drink to the health of the guys, and Pashin says this: "It's time to drink to the repose of the soul, and not to the health!"
[–] This suggests that, perhaps, he knew much more!
[VARSEGOVA]: What Mikhail Sharavin is telling now is confirmed by documents from the criminal case, as well as by the interrogation of this Pashin. When they landed at the pass, when they were forced to look for the tent and the missing tourists. And Pashin says that they found the tent 2 days before Sharavin and Slobtsov found it.
He says that he and his partner were walking and saw a tent, heavily covered with snow. They did not tear it apart and passed by, went somewhere else to look, returned and did not say anything to the students...
[–] How many participants in the Dyatlov group expedition were there in reality? This is the question we are going to discuss right now.
(https://i.ibb.co/DD2trDFb/ak8-sanitarka.jpg) (https://ibb.co/5WH6KW39)
It is very important for me to invite another extremely important witness to this studio now. This woman, then a young girl, who was a nurse in the Ivdel hospital, where the dead from the Dyatlov group were brought in March 1959. I would like Zoya Nikitichna Savina to join our conversation.
Hello! We have been talking about this topic for a very long time, and it is always very important for us to hear the testimony of any new witness. So, you saw the members of the Dyatlov group twice. The first time you saw them at the bus stop in Ivdel, when they were just getting ready to go on a hike. The second time you saw them in the morgue after they had already died. You were a very curious girl and spied on how the bodies of the dead were brought to the hospital. Tell us about it!
(https://i.ibb.co/pv6KCZSd/ak8-savina.jpg) (https://ibb.co/DDPM3kZQ)
[SAVINA]: I saw, I saw through the window. I was just climbing around, looking at the morgue.
[–] Describe to me what you saw. It's important.
[SAVINA]: There were 5 people there, two girls and three boys.
[–] What month was it?
[SAVINA] It was somewhere around the end of February, I think. I started working as a nurse on February 10th.
[–] As I understand it, one of these girls is Zina Kolmogorova?
[SAVINA]: I don’t know her name. She was wearing a headscarf, she was wearing socks. Her shoes were off. As if she was getting ready to sleep.
[–] That is, the bodies were dressed, all the clothes were on them. Now pay attention! You are saying that you saw the bodies of two girls at once. Natalya, tell me when exactly Dubinina’s body was discovered?
[VARSEGOVA]: Lyuda Dubinina was discovered on May 4.
[–] That is, 2 months after the moment our witness points out.
[VARSEGOVA]: Zina Kolmogorova was found first, she was found at the end of February.
[–] But how can we explain the fact that Zoya Nikitichna saw the bodies of two girls at once? Although two months passed between these finds!
[VARSEGOVA]: Let's ask Zoya Nikitichna! How did you determine that there were three guys and two girls?
[SAVINA]: Because they were wearing a scarf.
[VARSEGOVA]: In general, there was a very interesting situation in Ivdel. We encountered this during our last expedition. From completely different sources in Ivdel, who are not acquainted with each other, there is information that there were not 9 corpses, but 11 corpses. And what Zoya Nikitichna is now telling us is very interesting. I don't know how to perceive this, because it seems to me that 9 people died.
[SAVINA]: They say there were 10. Yudin returned, after all.
[VARSEGOVA]: By the way, you saw Yudin then. How did you even understand that it was Yudin? What was he doing?
[SAVINA]: I saw him crying.
[–] Let me remind you: Yuri Yudin is the young man who at the last moment refused to go on a hike with Dyatlov's group, and in this miraculous way he saved his life. Did you meet him?
[SAVINA]: I saw him. He was crying near the morgue.
[–] Let's talk about the number of people. The official information is 9 dead. But you say that back in March you saw the bodies of two girls, but one of them was found only in May. Perhaps this means that there were more participants in the hike!
[KUNTSEVICH]: No. They were probably other people. They were thrown there.
[TUMANOV]: These are just other dead.
[–] What do you mean other? Those who died in the same circumstances? Or were there really more members of Dyatlov's group?
[TUMANOV]: She's talking about the kerchief. According to the description of the clothes, none of the girls were wearing a headscarf.
[–] Ivdel is a small town. Everyone knew that the members of Dyatlov's group were brought to the morgue. How could a random person end up there? It is possible that there was another participant in the hike, whose name is not documented. A participant who went on the hike, but whose identity had to be hidden!
[VARSEGOVA]: I don't believe in this conspiracy theory, to be honest. I am more inclined to the opinion of Eduard Tumanov and Yuri Kuntsevich that there were other victims. Or someone else was brought to the morgue at the same time as Dyatlov. People die, it is possible.
[SABINA]: Zoya Nikitichna! At what distance did you observe them? And what made you go look at the bodies anyway?
[SAVINA]: I heard that they were brought to the morgue, and I immediately went to look.
[SABINA]: How far were you from them?
[SAVINA]: We were peeping through the window. The windows at the bottom are painted over…
[TUMANOV]: She was peeping at the dead through the morgue window. Moreover, the lower part of the window was painted over. But they got up and looked! Anyone could have been lying there!
EXPERT: Zoya Niktichna! Did you actually see those bodies there?
[SAVINA]: Yes, I did.
EXPERT: That’s the absolute truth, of course.
=============
[–] В эфире программа «На самом деле». Это студия, в которой невозможно солгать. Шокирующий поворот в деле о гибели студентов на перевале Дятлова.
[–] Какие ещё приметы заставляют вас сомневаться и думать, что в той местности побывали посторонние? Расскажите мне.
[–ШАРАВИН]: Я думаю, что косвенно мои доказательства строятся на том, что очень странно в нашем присутствии вёл себя проводник лесник Пашин. Мы поднялись по остаткам лыжни до границы леса, а дальше лыжня исчезла, и мы не знали, куда дальше двигаться. Вот тут Пашин вступил в свою роль. Он невольно вывел нас к останцу на перевале, а потом стал рассказывать, что вероятное дальнейшее направление движения группы могло быть на перевал, то есть выше по хребту до Отортена.
[–] Значит, врзможно, он был осведомлён больше, чем вы?
[ШАРАВИН]: Да. Прежде всего он невольно стал спиной к камню, и он направил нас в том направлении, куда мы пошли и обнаружили палатку. Мы прошли порядка километра – и мы натыкаемся на палатку! Мы забираем из палатки спирт, вечером с ребятами мы предлагаем выпить за здравие ребят, а Пашин говорит так: «Пора уж за упокой пить, а не за здравие!»
[–] Это говорит о том, возможно, что он знал гораздо больше!
[ВАРСЕГОВА]: То, что рассказывает сейчас Михаил Шаравин, подтверждается документами из уголовного дела, а также допросом этого Пашина. Когда они высадились у перевала, когда их заставили искать палатку и пропавших туристов. И Пашин рассказывает, что палатку они нашли за 2 дня до того, как её нашли Шаравин и Слобцов.
Он говорит, что они шли с напарником и увидели палатку, очень сильно занесённую снегом. Они не стали её разрывать и прошли мимо, сходили ещё где-то поискали, вернулись и ничего студентам не сказали…
[–] Сколько на самом деле было участников похода группы Дятлова? Это вопрос, который предстоит нам обсуждать прямо сейчас.
Для меня очень важно сейчас пригласить в эту студию ещё одного необыкновенно важного свидетеля. Эта женщина, тогда ещё юная девушка, которая была санитаркой в ивдельского больнице, куда в марте 1959 года привезли погибших из группы Дятлова. Я хочу, чтобы к нашему разговору присоединилась Зоя Никитична Савина.
Здравствуйте! Мы говорим на эту тему уже очень долго, и для нас всегда очень важно услышать показания любого нового свидетеля. Итак, вы видели участников группы Дятлова дважды. Первый раз вы увидели их на автобусной остановке в Ивделе, когда они только собирались идти в поход. Второй раз вы увидели их в морге уже после того, как они погибли. Вы были очень любопытной девушкой и подсмотрели за тем, как тела погибших были доставлены в больницу. Расскажите нам об этом!
[САВИНА]: Я видела, в окошко видела. Я просто лазила, в морг смотрела.
[–] Опишите мне то, что вы видели. Это важно.
[САВИНА]: Там было 5 человек, две девочки и три мальчика.
[–] Какой месяц это был?
[=] Это было где-то в конце февраля, по-моему. 10 февраля я начала работать санитаркой.
[–] Я так понимаю, что одна из этих девушек – это Зина Колмогорова?
[САВИНА]: Я не знаю по имени. Платочек был надет на ней, в носочках она была. Обувь снята была. Как будто спать она приготовилась.
[–] То есть, тела были одеты, все предметы одежды на них были. Сейчас внимание! Вы говорите о том, что вы увидели тела двух девушек сразу. Наталья, подскажите мне, когда именно было обнаружено тело Дубининой?
[ВАРСЕГОВА]: Люда Дубинина была обнаружена 4 мая.
[–] То есть, спустя 2 месяца после того момента, на который указывает наша свидетельница.
[ВАРСЕГОВА]: Первой была найдена Зина Колмогорова, как раз в конце февраля её нашли.
[–] Но как объяснить то, что Зоя Никитична увидела тела сразу двух девушек? Хотя между этими находками прошло 2 месяца!
[ВАРСЕГОВА]: Давайте спросим это у Зои Никитичны! Вот как вы определили, что было три парня и две девушки?
[САВИНА]: Потому что платочек был одет на них.
[ВАРСЕГОВА]: Вообще в Ивделе была очень интересная ситуация, Мы с этим столкнулись во время нашей последней экспедиции. Из совершенно разных источников в Ивделе, которые между собой не знакомы, такая ходит информация, что было не 9 трупов, а 11 трупов. И то, что сейчас рассказывает Зоя Никитична, очень интересно. Я не знаю, как это воспринимать, потому что мне кажется, что погибли 9 человек.
[САВИНА]: Говорят, их было 10. Юдин вернулся ведь.
[ВАРСЕГОВА]: Кстати, вы видели Юдина тогда. Как вы вообще поняли, что это Юдин? Что он делал?
[САВИНА]: Я видела, как он плакал.
[–] Я напомню: Юрий Юдин – это тот молодой человек, который в последний момент отказался от похода с группой Дятлова, и таким чудесным образом он спас себе жизнь. Вы встречались с ним?
[САВИНА]: Я его видела. Он плакал возле морга.
[–] Давайте погворим о количестве людей. Официальная информация – 9 погибших. Но вы говорите о том, что ещё в марте вы увидели тела двух девушек, но одну из них нашли только в мае. Возможно, это означает, что участников похода было больше!
[КУНЦЕВИЧ]: Нет. Наверное, это другие люди. Их подкинули туда.
[ТУМАНОВ]: Это просто другие погибшие.
[–] Что значит другие? Это погибшие в тех же обстоятельствах? Или действительно членов группы Дятлова было больше?
[ТУМАНОВ]: Она говорит про косынку. Согласно описанию одежды, ни на одной из девушек не было косынки.
[–] Ивдель – маленький населённый пункт. Всем известно было, что в морг привезли участников группы Дятлова. Как там мог оказаться случайный человек? Возможно, что была ещё одна участница похода, имя которой не задокументировано. Участница, которая отправилась в поход, но персону которой нужно было скрыть!
[ВАРСЕГОВА]: Я не верю, если честно, в эту конспирологию. Я больше склоняюсь к мнению Эдуарда Туманова и Юрия Кунцевича о том, что были другие погибшие. Или одновременно с Дятловым кого-то ещё доставили в морг. Люди умирают, это возможно.
[САБИНА]: Зоя Никитична! На каком расстоянии вы наблюдали их? И что вообще заставило вас пойти смотреть трупы?
[САВИНА]: Я услыхала, что привезли их в морг, и я сразу пошла смотреть.
[САБИНА]: На каком удалении вы находились от них?
[САВИНА]: Мы в окошко подглядывали. Окна внизу закрашены…
[ТУМАНОВ]: Она подсматривала за погибшими через окно морга. Причём нижняя часть окна закрашена была. Но они поднимались и смотрели! Так там мог лежать кто угодно!
ЭКСПЕРТ: Зоя Никтичнка! Вы на самом деле видели там эти трупы?
[САВИНА]: Да, видела.
ЭКСПЕРТ: Это чистая правда, безусловно.
(https://i.ibb.co/DD2trDFb/ak8-sanitarka.jpg) (https://ibb.co/5WH6KW39)
(https://i.ibb.co/pv6KCZSd/ak8-savina.jpg) (https://ibb.co/DDPM3kZQ)
-
Axelrod, thak you for the post and translation. That is another example of your serious and responsible contribution to the forum.
I am certainly doubtful of the accuracy of the obervations whuch amount to identifying gender by a garment seen through a peephole .
I am intrigued by the comments regarding Pashin, the Forester. Does this explain the presence of the flashlight found on top of 10 cm or 5 inches of snow on the tent?
As I recall, the tent was " officially" discovered as a dark shape in the distence. There is no mention of the rescuers following a ski or footpath to the tent. Further, there were no prints found at the tent when discovered. Also when discovered, a new cut was made in the canvas to look inside.
Would Pashin go to the tent, leave a light, retreat and brush away his tracks, come back and not take credit for discovery?
Yes, he made an unpopular toast, it signifies only a fatalistic apperciation of the situation.
-
Everyone and Teddy:
We forget the past when Bienko Vladislav Nikolaevich : (copy and paste) UPI student who was supposed to go on the trek led by Dyatlov. Zolotaryov took his place in Dyatlov group. In UPI there were rumors circulating that he was not allowed to do the trek due to skipped exams. The Komsomol sent Bienko to a logging camp. Lev Ivanov trusted Bienko to develop some of the films found in the tent. We will never find the original photos of film that "Bienko" developed..
The Blotched image of believed was a tagalong and succumbed to death
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-volume-2-61?rbid=19667
(https://i.ibb.co/B2XKM9S9/Slobodin-s-carmera-2025-04-28-7-49-58-PM.png) (https://ibb.co/s90JYZMZ)
(https://i.ibb.co/Sz8VjZ5/unknown-body-2025-04-28-7-47-46-PM.png) (https://ibb.co/nFvQGK6)
Thanks
Kathleen D Smith
(https://i.ibb.co/XfGGr1Kn/Bienko-1-2025-04-29-3-38-59-PM.png) (https://ibb.co/tw11Tgv0)
-
Bienko was paid the equivalent of $4.27 to do a rush job developing photos. He did it. There is a photo of rescuers pulling a body on a sled. There is an underexposed image. Somehow, this is supposed to clarify that a 10th person perished with the DP9.
Once again, it is conspiracy and coverup with out rhyme or reason that I can see. The only true information is first hand information from film and diaries. All else is heresay, testimony and speculative in the absense of facts. Those speculations must be valid and reliable to have any bearing on the case. At best, they address the how, not the why of things.
Insight appreciated.
-
In addition to the 12 scattered photographs listed on the page
https://dyatlovpass.com/loose-photos
There was also a photo of a girl who was shown in the first film about the Dyatov Pass (1997-1999)
(https://i.ibb.co/ccwLHCZW/neznakomka.png) (https://imgbb.com/)
In is photo (format .PNG) from Russian forum .
Even in those years, only 40 years later, no one identified any UPI student in this girl.
Perhaps this is the tenth or eleventh victim that nurse Zoya Savina saw in the morgue in a headscarf.
-
This girl among other photos
(https://i.ibb.co/nsRmZxYT/images-from-ivanov.jpg) (https://ibb.co/SXJyWFM2)
-
It seems unreasonable to me that the 10th or 11th person is never referred to in diaries. I believe it to be a total fiction and a distraction from the real questions ofnthe mystery.
The woman in the photo had a name. Who knows where the photo was taken. Further, if the girl wound up dead, what has that to do with the hikers? Nothing.
Imstead, let us agree on where the last camp was. Let us agree on the unknown compelling force. Let us agree on what happened in the ravine. We need no 10th ghost.
-
This girl among other photos
(https://i.ibb.co/nsRmZxYT/images-from-ivanov.jpg) (https://ibb.co/SXJyWFM2)
A table top with some photos ?
-
Why post a picture of random pictures when all the photos are not from the 1959 Dyatlov pass incident.
It is either a deliberate effort to cause harm and damage the credibility of the forum or to purely get hits and prolong the debate .
-
In addition to the 12 scattered photographs listed on the page
https://dyatlovpass.com/loose-photos
There was also a photo of a girl who was shown in the first film about the Dyatov Pass (1997-1999)
(https://i.ibb.co/ccwLHCZW/neznakomka.png) (https://imgbb.com/)
In is photo (format .PNG) from Russian forum .
Even in those years, only 40 years later, no one identified any UPI student in this girl.
Perhaps this is the tenth or eleventh victim that nurse Zoya Savina saw in the morgue in a headscarf.
I've never seen this before, thanks for giving me something new to study!
-
Why post a picture of random pictures when all the photos are not from the 1959 Dyatlov pass incident.
It is either a deliberate effort to cause harm and damage the credibility of the forum or to purely get hits and prolong the debate .
Why not just troll him about his mum like last time? And what are you talking about "the credibility of the forum?" Where else is he supposed to post it? And the accusation that he's not interested in anything other than his own glory is a bit rich coming from you. You're on every post slinging ad hominem attacks around!
-
For entertainment purposes only. Not to impinge. Here's what my research assistant says:
1. Origin & Date
Source: One of the undeveloped film rolls found with the hikers’ bodies on the slope of Kholat Syakhl (“Dead Mountain”).
Date Taken: January 31 or February 1, 1959—on the outbound leg of their “Grade II” ski trek, just before they set up camp on the open slope.
2. Who You’re Seeing
Likely Subject: Most scholars identify her as Lyudmila Dubinina (one of the two young women in the group), seated on her skis beside her pulk (sled) and gear. Some have also suggested Zinaida “Zina” Kolmogorova, since both women wore similar parkas and used identical equipment—but the consensus leans toward Dubinina.
3. Gear & Setting
Ski Pulk: The small sled at her side carried much of the party’s camp equipment—tents, cooking gear, sleeping bags. In this shot you can see the canvas straps and wooden frame.
Forest Edge: Behind her are the larch and birch trees lining the ravine where the bodies would later be discovered. This exact slope became the site of the four hikers’ deaths from massive internal trauma.
4. Photographic Significance
Final “Normal” Moment: This frame shows the group relaxed and in good spirits—no sign yet of the catastrophic events to come that night.
Chronology Anchor: Investigators used photos like this to pin down the party’s timeline, confirming they reached the clearing on February 1, built their tent in the open snow, and then—for reasons still debated—cut their way out hours later.
5. Relation to the Ravine Injuries
No Visible Clues of Explosion: Even in high-resolution scans, you won’t find scorch marks, deformation of metal equipment, or any physical indication of a blast-wave on the tent or sled in this—or any—photo.
Contrast with Autopsy Findings: The serenity of this image contrasts sharply with the autopsy reports: four victims found in the nearby ravine suffered “severe chest fractures” (rib, sternum and spine) consistent with a high-energy pressure wave—yet with no external bruising.
6. Fuel for “Tenth Hiker” & “Unknown Woman” Theories
The “Neznakomka” Myth: Some conspiracy-minded researchers point to a distant figure seen in a separate roll of Dyatlov photos and christened the “Neznakomka” (“the unknown woman”), suggesting the group was stalked by a mysterious tenth person.
Counter-Explanation: That figure is almost certainly a snowbank or tree stump seen through multiple exposures—there is no authenticated “hidden” passenger in the pulk.
Bottom Line
This image is a poignant snapshot of Lyudmila Dubinina (or possibly Zina Kolmogorova) at the very moment the hikers still believed they were on a routine winter ski tour—just hours before the incomprehensible injuries and deaths in the ravine transformed them into one of Russia’s most enduring mysteries.
-
While this "other woman" theory seems to have been debunked, I believe it's important to post these things occasionally, as new users (like me) to the forum, may not have seen them before.
The “Neznakomka” (“Unknown Woman”) is one of the more enduring—and most thoroughly debunked—Dyatlov Pass legends. Here’s how the myth grew and why virtually every serious investigator today rejects it:
1. Origin of the Myth
A blurry figure on the negatives: When several of the Dyatlov group’s undeveloped film rolls were finally processed, one frame shows a vaguely humanoid shape standing some distance from the tent. Conspiracy-minded websites and forums immediately dubbed her the “Neznakomka,” suggesting the hikers were stalked by a mysterious tenth member or a shadowy Mansi hunter
Reddit
.
2. Popular Theories about the “Unknown Woman”
A secret tenth hiker: Some claimed she was a tenth expedition member never officially recorded, perhaps a spy or a guide who disappeared under suspicious circumstances.
A local pursuer: Others posited she was a Mansi tribeswoman intent on driving the students off “her” mountain.
Paranormal entity: In occult circles she’s even been labeled a ghost or extraterrestrial observer.
3. The Reality Check
Multiple exposures and artifacts: Closer analysis of the entire film reel shows this “figure” only appears on a single frame, in a location where later images reveal snowbanks, tree stumps and camera-strap shadows. In other words, it’s a parallax artifact—a quirk of film development and double-exposure—rather than a flesh-and-blood human
Dyatlov Pass
.
Trail evidence: If there had been a real person that close to the campsite, fresh footprints in the snow would have been obvious. None were ever documented beyond the nine hikers’ tracks.
Group testimony & records: All nine members appear by name in diaries, university approvals and tent inventories; no tenth name or alias ever surfaces.
Why the Myth Persists
Mystery fuels speculation: The Dyatlov case remains officially “disputed,” and gaps in the Soviet-era files invite endless conjecture.
Compelling imagery: A vague, human-shaped blur is exactly the sort of photo that fans of supernatural and cover-up theories love to exploit.
Bottom Line: There was no tenth member, indigenous stealth-hunter, or ghostly watcher hiding behind that flimsy tent. The “Neznakomka” is simply a quirk of old film and a testament to how hungry we are for an extra twist in an already baffling tragedy.
-
Why post a picture of random pictures when all the photos are not from the 1959 Dyatlov pass incident.
It is either a deliberate effort to cause harm and damage the credibility of the forum or to purely get hits and prolong the debate .
Why not just troll him about his mum like last time? And what are you talking about "the credibility of the forum?" Where else is he supposed to post it? And the accusation that he's not interested in anything other than his own glory is a bit rich coming from you. You're on every post slinging ad hominem attacks around!
My apologies OLD JEDI . I reference the credibility to the forum of the multiple photos. It is a mix of photos from various years , or so it's claimed . There is no reference to where the multiple photos came from , when it was taken or who took it and for what purpose. It adds confusion and I wouldn't expect Axelrod to confuse the pictures as he will know.
I'm sure Axelrod will give a source to the photos . Axelrod has referenced his mother's and families knowledge on the Dyatlov pass.
-
Why post a picture of random pictures when all the photos are not from the 1959 Dyatlov pass incident.
It is either a deliberate effort to cause harm and damage the credibility of the forum or to purely get hits and prolong the debate .
Why not just troll him about his mum like last time? And what are you talking about "the credibility of the forum?" Where else is he supposed to post it? And the accusation that he's not interested in anything other than his own glory is a bit rich coming from you. You're on every post slinging ad hominem attacks around!
My apologies OLD JEDI . I reference the credibility to the forum of the multiple photos. It is a mix of photos from various years , or so it's claimed . There is no reference to where the multiple photos came from , when it was taken or who took it and for what purpose. It adds confusion and I wouldn't expect Axelrod to confuse the pictures as he will know.
I'm sure Axelrod will give a source to the photos . Axelrod has referenced his mother's and families knowledge on the Dyatlov pass.
Ah, thanks for clearing that up. I was like his mum? Dang it's getting deep lol so that's why I went on the offense a bit.
-
(https://i.ibb.co/ccQk2Gjr/neznakomka.png) (https://imgbb.com/)
Here's what I found on the where this picture comes from:
That image of the lone skier seated on her pulk isn’t a stray tourist photo at all but one of the original Dyatlov-party negatives—specifically, it comes from Film № 1 recovered in Georgiy Krivonischenko’s Zorkii “488797” camera.
Camera ownership: Krivonischenko (one of the nine hikers) packed a Zorkii rangefinder for candid group shots. When search teams found his body, that camera still held a full 34-frame roll.
Which frame: This is among the last “normal” expedition frames—showing Lyudmila Dubinina (or, by some accounts, Zinaida Kolmogorova) at the edge of the ravine, taken just before they pitched the tent on that open slope.
Why it matters: Because it’s on Krivonischenko’s roll, not Igor Dyatlov’s or Rustem Slobodin’s, it confirms he was photographing the site right up until the tragic events later that night, and it anchors our timeline to their final moments of calm.
In short, this isn’t an anonymous tourist snap—it’s one of the nine hikers’ own cameras (Krivonischenko’s), captured just hours before the tent was abandoned.
-
Why post a picture of random pictures when all the photos are not from the 1959 Dyatlov pass incident.
It is either a deliberate effort to cause harm and damage the credibility of the forum or to purely get hits and prolong the debate .
Why not just troll him about his mum like last time? And what are you talking about "the credibility of the forum?" Where else is he supposed to post it? And the accusation that he's not interested in anything other than his own glory is a bit rich coming from you. You're on every post slinging ad hominem attacks around!
My apologies OLD JEDI . I reference the credibility to the forum of the multiple photos. It is a mix of photos from various years , or so it's claimed . There is no reference to where the multiple photos came from , when it was taken or who took it and for what purpose. It adds confusion and I wouldn't expect Axelrod to confuse the pictures as he will know.
I'm sure Axelrod will give a source to the photos . Axelrod has referenced his mother's and families knowledge on the Dyatlov pass.
Ah, thanks for clearing that up. I was like his mum? Dang it's getting deep lol so that's why I went on the offense a bit.
Perhaps a lesson for all of us? I did not see what was in the deleted post and it may have nothing to do with me as to why the post was deleted.
-
(https://i.ibb.co/ccQk2Gjr/neznakomka.png) (https://imgbb.com/)
Here's what I found on the where this picture comes from:
That image of the lone skier seated on her pulk isn’t a stray tourist photo at all but one of the original Dyatlov-party negatives—specifically, it comes from Film № 1 recovered in Georgiy Krivonischenko’s Zorkii “488797” camera.
Camera ownership: Krivonischenko (one of the nine hikers) packed a Zorkii rangefinder for candid group shots. When search teams found his body, that camera still held a full 34-frame roll.
Which frame: This is among the last “normal” expedition frames—showing Lyudmila Dubinina (or, by some accounts, Zinaida Kolmogorova) at the edge of the ravine, taken just before they pitched the tent on that open slope.
Why it matters: Because it’s on Krivonischenko’s roll, not Igor Dyatlov’s or Rustem Slobodin’s, it confirms he was photographing the site right up until the tragic events later that night, and it anchors our timeline to their final moments of calm.
In short, this isn’t an anonymous tourist snap—it’s one of the nine hikers’ own cameras (Krivonischenko’s), captured just hours before the tent was abandoned.
I do not think this information is correct.Where did this information come from?
-
Your favorite, AI. But check this out, it says it's from frame 34 of Yuri Kri's camera but disputes this websites version of frame 34 saying it's Igor's last image. This thing is either very smart or dumb lol. However, I do like the speed for which it assists.
ChatGPT said:
What you’re seeing on that page is actually the single under-exposed, distorted image from Igor Dyatlov’s second roll – not the sharp daylight frame from Krivonischenko’s camera. The site’s “Frame 34” refers to their own sequential numbering of all the images they have, and so they’ve numbered Dyatlov’s lone dark shot as “34” in their gallery. Here’s why it looks so damaged:
Under-exposure:
That shot was taken at dusk (or in a whiteout), so the film never got enough light. It records almost nothing but fogged-out blurs.
Brittle, frozen emulsion:
At –30 °C the gelatin layer on the film cracks. When the roll was thawed weeks later, those fine fractures became white streaks and spider-web patterns.
Physical abrasion:
Handling rough snowy gloves, then Soviet lab technicians’ early scanners, left scratches, dirt and water spots all over the negative.
Digitization artifacts:
Low-contrast scans magnify every speck of dust and scratch. What little image there was gets overwhelmed by noise during scanning, so the result looks more “damaged” than “photo.”
In short, the “Frame 34” in their gallery is the very last—but horribly under-exposed—negative from Igor Dyatlov’s own Zorkii camera. Its ghostly, scratched appearance isn’t a broken link, but the real state of that film.
-
Even the negatives show that blurry photo as the final, so something is up! But the fact it insists it's from Yuri K's camera is weird because all I did was upload the picture and ask it where it's from.
-
I would suspect the AI will only search for what's available, like what is discussed on this forum. It's a failed feed back loop. All we have is the theories and many have come to a stand still.
If it's search statements from fake or false claims , all it can do is repeat what has already been said.
-
I would suspect the AI will only search for what's available, like what is discussed on this forum. It's a failed feed back loop. All we have is the theories and many have come to a stand still.
If it's search statements from fake or false claims , all it can do is repeat what has already been said.
Ok, I did a Deep Research (it took 20 minutes) and think you will like the conclusion:
Origin and Inclusion in Official Case Files
This photograph is legitimate and originates from the Dyatlov expedition’s own film rolls, not a later hoax or fabrication. It was found in the Soviet case files of the 1959 Dyatlov Pass incident, albeit as a puzzling outlier. In early March 1959, a student volunteer (a member of the search party) retrieved Igor Dyatlov’s camera from the abandoned tent and developed its film privately before handing it over to investigators
dyatlovpass.com
. Investigators then added several “loose” photos (unaligned with the main rolls) into the case evidence. This included the now-infamous image of a seated hiker who did not match any of the nine known victims
dyatlovpass.com
. In other words, the photo genuinely appears in the official archival documents – it was “introduced in the case file without explanation of its origin”
dyatlovpass.com
– but it does not show a mystery attacker or unknown rescuer. Instead, research by the Dyatlov Foundation indicates the shot likely came from Igor Dyatlov’s camera (serial №55242643) and had been taken before the fatal trek. The film in that camera contained mostly older images, and only the very last frames were from the Dyatlov party’s final journey
dyatlovpass.com
. The earliest known source of this photo is thus the 1959 investigative archives themselves, which remained classified for decades. It resurfaced publicly in the 2000s when investigators like Aleksey Koskin and Yuri Kuntsevich obtained copies of the case files and negatives (notably in 2009)
dyatlovpass.com
. The photo was published on the Dyatlov Foundation’s website as one of several “loose photos” that had no clear place in the main sequence of the group’s journey
dyatlovpass.com
. In modern publications and documentaries, the image is often reproduced directly from those archives (for example, major news outlets credit it as “photo from the case materials, via Dyatlov Pass site”)
obzor.lt
ria.ru
. All evidence affirms that it belongs to the original collection of expedition photographs – its legitimacy is not in doubt. The mystery lies in why it shows an unfamiliar person.
-
How did an unrelated person’s photo end up in the Dyatlov case files? The likely explanation is quite mundane: the film roll in Igor Dyatlov’s camera had leftover exposures from an earlier outing. It was common for student hikers to reuse film rolls, meaning the first portion of that roll could contain images from a previous hike (featuring people who were not on the Dyatlov Pass trek). Indeed, investigators note that only the final frame on Igor’s roll was from the 1959 trek, with the earlier frames showing older scenes
dyatlovpass.com
. That would perfectly explain why a photo of Dubinina’s friend ended up alongside the Dyatlov expedition images – it was simply never separated when the films were developed under rushed conditions in 1959. The Soviet investigators apparently filed the entire developed roll’s prints into evidence, even if some showed unrelated subjects. (In the chaos of the search and investigation, this oversight is understandable – initially, officials might not have recognized the woman and included the print out of thoroughness or mistake.) Later archivists like Koskin catalogued it as an “unknown photo,” noting the woman “does not participate in the trek”
dyatlovpass.com
. No official source identifies the woman by name, but Dyatlov researchers have made educated guesses. A second “loose” photo in the archive shows a group of hikers from an earlier trip, and in that image the same unknown girl appears alongside Lyudmila Dubinina (smiling together in a group shot)
dyatlovpass.com
. This suggests she was likely a fellow UPI student and friend in the university’s hiking club. In short, the figure is almost certainly an “outsider” to the Dyatlov Pass incident itself – a known person from the hikers’ social circle, but not present on Dead Mountain. There is no evidence she secretly tagged along during the final trek, and all Dyatlov group diaries and testimonies confirm only the original nine were on the route. Therefore, the photo does not depict a mysterious tenth hiker at the scene of the tragedy, but rather a misplaced memory from an earlier adventure. Modern Dyatlov case investigators consider this identification settled: the photo is authentic but contextually unrelated to the fatal incident
dyatlovpass.com
.
-Seems pretty cut and dried to me.
-
Exactly, as it's been discussed before. bang1
-
Cute girl and a guy with a camera, problem solved.
-
Exactly, as it's been discussed before. bang1
I understand your frustration now, especially since Axelrod seems to be muddying the waters with old stuff. That's on him but the nature of this forum is that someone new (like me) is always joining and maybe he's trying to peddle his wares essentially. I had never heard of the situation and thankfully didn't have to invest too much time searching thanks to the AI. To someone like you who probably knows everything about the incident, this is obviously very tedious.
Around, around the mulberry bush.. Don't go pop!
-
Piece of advice. In the written word, one can not see the wink and smile. Conversely, you can't see the bottom teeth showing to differentiate between a thoughtful comment and a snarky remark.
I think the AI effort to divine Igor's thoughts as an explanation for ultimately abandoning the tent might produce a useful thread. I personally think there was no choice except do or die at the tent. An AI query would have to be based on fact and lead to an inescapable conclusion. The reason I do not hold out much hope is that by definition an unknown compelling force is unknown. That variable is the Rosetta Stone of the mystery. I suppose various scenarios could be fed to the bot, but at some point a human is going to assign values for greater and lesser likelihood. And then we are back to speculation.
-
Exactly, as it's been discussed before. bang1
I understand your frustration now, especially since Axelrod seems to be muddying the waters with old stuff. That's on him but the nature of this forum is that someone new (like me) is always joining and maybe he's trying to peddle his wares essentially. I had never heard of the situation and thankfully didn't have to invest too much time searching thanks to the AI. To someone like you who probably knows everything about the incident, this is obviously very tedious.
Around, around the mulberry bush.. Don't go pop!
I don't know everything about the incident but I do know there's a lot of fake news about the Dyatlov pass. It is the same fake news that is used in political circles and social media. It will be extremely difficult if not impossible for AI to differentiate between factual and fake news regardless of the questions asked on any topic. There are many theories and they all have their own holes and contradictions. None unfortunately are conclusive.
Researching them all is time consuming and takes a lot of cross-reference. Even some of the original witnesses that gave later interviews suggest their statements were used in an manipulative way or misused in later theories.
The question is, what information can we trust ?. We now have ( or Ido) a better understanding of the Mansi tree signs and there family names.
We have a picture from the searchers saying " unknown body " which is just a description of the photo. It is not saying there was a uknow body at the pass.
The later picture of the woman sitting on the skis is just that , an unknown picture that could be taken from any hike at that time in history. The accuracy as to when it was dropped into the Dyatlov pass incident is open to debate but as far as it has been researched the picture has no connection to the case files.
Axelrod has written a collection of the theories in his book which would also be a good place for you to start and the Dyatlov pass website. From there you could find good questions to use your AI to confirm those theories?
It is tedious for sure but researching always has been....
-
I understand your reservations because I have had them up until recently. It's a money thing also, if you notice its first responses they were generic like it was possibly Zina or Dubinina but then when I changed to the beta 4.5 model and did a Deep Research (I pay $20 a month for Plus access) you saw the difference. It also searched snopes which it doesn't do unless it's a deep research. I'm sure Axelrods book is riveting lol, but I'll pass. I am fairly confident the photo is of a hiker from a previous expedition.
-
Piece of advice. In the written word, one can not see the wink and smile. Conversely, you can't see the bottom teeth showing to differentiate between a thoughtful comment and a snarky remark.
I think the AI effort to divine Igor's thoughts as an explanation for ultimately abandoning the tent might produce a useful thread. I personally think there was no choice except do or die at the tent. An AI query would have to be based on fact and lead to an inescapable conclusion. The reason I do not hold out much hope is that by definition an unknown compelling force is unknown. That variable is the Rosetta Stone of the mystery. I suppose various scenarios could be fed to the bot, but at some point a human is going to assign values for greater and lesser likelihood. And then we are back to speculation.
Have you tried AI Igor? Don't question his authority! Personally, I think AI does better at character impersonation than it does (at the free level) at reasoning sometimes. I tend to use the basic model even though I don't have to.
-
I understand your reservations because I have had them up until recently. It's a money thing also, if you notice its first responses they were generic like it was possibly Zina or Dubinina but then when I changed to the beta 4.5 model and did a Deep Research (I pay $20 a month for Plus access) you saw the difference. It also searched snopes which it doesn't do unless it's a deep research. I'm sure Axelrods book is riveting lol, but I'll pass. I am fairly confident the photo is of a hiker from a previous expedition.
What's a money thing? At 20 dollars a month you could buy several books, the forum is free as is the website and Axelrod's book in several languages.
You questioned your own research V AI , after asking different questions in the AI , you are now confident that this hiker is from a different expedition, how do you know which is true? How can the AI tell the difference?
This is sounding more like a sales pitch by the minute. Why even mention £20 dollars a month for AI when it's inaccurate and the material for research is free?
I really hope you are not advertising. It's been a slow sales pitch.....
-
No, not advertising at all, just embracing a new way to research. Sales pitch lol, what interest do you think I have in this thing? What's the name of his book(s)? I'll have Igor read them! lol4
-
No, not advertising at all, just embracing a new way to research. Sales pitch lol, what interest do you think I have in this thing? What's the name of his book(s)? I'll have Igor read them! lol4
Embracing.....
From using AI in Google about AI?.
While ChatGPT can be a helpful tool for generating text and exploring ideas, it's crucial to understand that it's not a reliable source of factual information for research. Its responses, while often seemingly accurate, can be misleading or even fabricated, especially in specialized fields. It's important to verify information from ChatGPT with credible sources and be aware of its limitations.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Reasons for Caution:
Fabricated References:
ChatGPT has been shown to generate fabricated references, making it difficult to verify the accuracy of its claims.
Lack of Real-Time Data:
ChatGPT's knowledge is limited to the data it was trained on, which doesn't include real-time updates.
Difficulty with Complex Subjects:
ChatGPT may struggle with nuanced concepts and deeper dives into specific research areas.
Potential for Bias:
ChatGPT's responses can be influenced by the data it was trained on, leading to potential biases.
Not a Replacement for Expertise:
ChatGPT should not be used as a substitute for in-depth knowledge or critical thinking in research.
Axelrod rods book and his reference to his mother and family.
https://forum.dyatlovpass.com/index.php?topic=1650.0
Direct link to Dyatlov pass and numerous later research.
https://dyatlovpass.com/
Direct link to all theories through the Dyatlov pass forum which also has many links to other forums with respected researches.
https://forum.dyatlovpass.com/index.php
Your comments regarding reading Axelrod's book as riveting then following by lol and then suggesting that Igor reads them with a giggle could be perhaps seen as trolling.
A Lot of work has been done by many people , right or wrong misguided or inaccurate.
I suggest reading them in their entirety and then see if AI is matching what has been said or not said. , Happy researching, I look forward to reading your observations and conclusions through your own work and effort.
-
Every day need not be boxing day.
-
No, not advertising at all, just embracing a new way to research. Sales pitch lol, what interest do you think I have in this thing? What's the name of his book(s)? I'll have Igor read them! lol4
Embracing.....
From using AI in Google about AI?.
While ChatGPT can be a helpful tool for generating text and exploring ideas, it's crucial to understand that it's not a reliable source of factual information for research. Its responses, while often seemingly accurate, can be misleading or even fabricated, especially in specialized fields. It's important to verify information from ChatGPT with credible sources and be aware of its limitations.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Reasons for Caution:
Fabricated References:
ChatGPT has been shown to generate fabricated references, making it difficult to verify the accuracy of its claims.
Lack of Real-Time Data:
ChatGPT's knowledge is limited to the data it was trained on, which doesn't include real-time updates.
Difficulty with Complex Subjects:
ChatGPT may struggle with nuanced concepts and deeper dives into specific research areas.
Potential for Bias:
ChatGPT's responses can be influenced by the data it was trained on, leading to potential biases.
Not a Replacement for Expertise:
ChatGPT should not be used as a substitute for in-depth knowledge or critical thinking in research.
Axelrod rods book and his reference to his mother and family.
https://forum.dyatlovpass.com/index.php?topic=1650.0
Direct link to Dyatlov pass and numerous later research.
https://dyatlovpass.com/
Direct link to all theories through the Dyatlov pass forum which also has many links to other forums with respected researches.
https://forum.dyatlovpass.com/index.php
Your comments regarding reading Axelrod's book as riveting then following by lol and then suggesting that Igor reads them with a giggle could be perhaps seen as trolling.
A Lot of work has been done by many people , right or wrong misguided or inaccurate.
I suggest reading them in their entirety and then see if AI is matching what has been said or not said. , Happy researching, I look forward to reading your observations and conclusions through your own work and effort.
I'm pretty sure I've made this quite clear from the beginning regarding AI. As far as my lol it is my honest reaction considering the title of this thread. Hardly trolling. But as I mentioned earlier, I believe it's important to readvance redundant material for argument's sake because eventually everyone who researches this will wind up there. Whether you read "analog" books or whatever. And as far as my theories, I think you know where I stand and I never used AI to say it until recently. This case will forever be dead, like it or not, and always be unprovable, but the speculation is what really grabs me. Within reason.
-
Every day need not be boxing day.
Imagine being in a tent and you get hit with a snow slab and everyone screaming "Semyon told you this would happen!" Talk about Boxing Day without the role reversal.
-
The story with this girl in the photo is unclear to me. Igor Dyatlov and my relative Moses Axelrot were tohether in previous winker ski hike - and there were no girls with them as you say now. So this photo has another source.
Somehow, in Ivanov's photo archive, there are photos of a guy and a girl who have nothing to do with the Dyatlov group.
This is combined with the testimony of nurse Solter and orderly Savina from Ivdel that in addition to Kolmogorova there was another girl, and in total there were 11 corpses.
Also, Vera Belledir's father from Ivdel told her that in addition to the Dyatlov group, there was a search for the children of General Lelyushenko (a guy and a girl).
This looks like a made-up story, but it all seems true, given these unidentified photos.
I don't have an answer to this riddle yet.
-
Common sense and common courtesy would be to acknowledge a new member to the tour. Nothing in the record indicated this was done. Another fantasy, I fear.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-m-wkaQKkA&t=650s
10-50:
"Их было не 9, их было 11. И чтобы скрыть следы детей Лелюшенко, это всё были и сделано"
There were not 9 of them, there were 11. And in order to hide the traces of Lelyushenko's children, all this was done!
-
Leljushenko's son Boris Leljushenko died in 1993 and was buried next to his father.
Father
Лелюшенко Дмитрий Данилович
1901-1987
Son
Лелюшенко Борис Дмитриевич 1935-1993
https://novodevichiynecropol.narod.ru/07/lelyushenko_dd.htm
-
I also doubt that the body of the unknown person in the photo is the body of Lelyushenko's son, but you have given me interesting information for further research.
Firstly, his son is the same age as the tourists.
Together with D.D. Lelyushenko, Boris Dmitrievich Lelyushenko (1935-1993), a design engineer, and leading engineer at the Krasnaya Zvezda Scientific and Production Association, is buried.
Krasnaya Zvezda is a plant in Moscow that develops nuclear power plants for space[1].
-
In order to make any of this speculation credible I would expect the 10th joined at Vizhay. I would ask what of Yuden's supplies. I would ask where the 10th was found and by whom. I am reminded that the initial search team were not government "spooks". If they found someone, they would report it.
For me, this 10th person spin on the story is a force fit of unsubstantiated gossip into a myth. It also is a distraction from the central mystery of the abandonment of the tent.
-
I remembered that there is another version of the appearance of a strange girl's photo on Dyatlov's camera. This is described in the group's diary by Kolevatov.
In addition to the 12 scattered photographs listed on the page
https://dyatlovpass.com/loose-photos
There was also a photo of a girl who was shown in the first film about the Dyatov Pass (1997-1999)
(https://i.ibb.co/ccwLHCZW/neznakomka.png) (https://imgbb.com/)
this is the tenth or eleventh victim that nurse Zoya Savina saw in the morgue in a headscarf.
The prospect to walk about thirty kilometers on the highway with no breakfast and lunch already seemed quite real, when suddenly ... I mentioned that fate is merciful. The mercy came in the form of a girl going to Vizhay that hailed the bus and stopped the object of our persecution. A minute later we were already safely sitting on the second floor of the seats and traveling to Vizhay.
-
A reasonable explanation Axelrod.
I still think it's a random photo and wasn't a query In the Dyatlov case .