picture of the lights

[farelaurent]

I worked on the photo of the lights taken by the group
I wanted to bring out details
There is a light that has an octagonal shape
My name is Farel Laurent, I live in France in a city called Longwy.

[Missi]

You applied digital filters and the like to a picture. Things like your octagonal shape are what happen then. When looking at the eighth and ninth of your pictures, I'm sure I can make out a CD. Does that mean, it's all about some storage medium from the future?

What do you suggest, that shape means?

[farelaurent]

If you look at the original photo that the group took in zoom, you will also see this octagonal shape.
The photo is stored on my computer. The original photo appears as the second photo.
I didn't modify anything, I just applied color and sharpened the photo, that's all. The octagonal shape appears on the original, so it's not due to my filters.
It's either a man-made device, an extraterrestrial device, or a hoax.
It is impossible to answer this question; I do not believe in the avalanche theory or the theory of a tree falling on the aunt

[Missi]

Sure it's in there. I take it for lens flare.

(By the way, not to be rude, but because I found it cute and I myself like people pointing out things like that for me: The last word you mean is "tent". "aunt" is a parents sister. I believe in french it's le tente and la tante?)

[Ziljoe]

It's explained in here.

https://dyatlovpass.com/frame-34

The octagon shape is the middle of the lens. The lens is said to be Industar-22. I believe it's a fact that it's known that the lens is not fully extended. It this that causes the blurring . If you look at the pictures of the lens you can see the reflection of light on the glass and the 8 sided shape.

Frame 34 was the last picture taken in the camera and is the end of the film before you have to wind it back. As I understand it , this camera was found in the tent and is definitely not Zolo's camera as we know the photos that came before frame 34.

The link explains the most likely scenario.

[farelaurent]

Yes, I had thought of that, but what do you think these lights are?
There are also testimonies from people who saw a luminous orb at the group's campsite.
Sorry for my very bad English

[farelaurent]

Looking at the light on the left with a trail suggests an object moving downwards towards the ground

[Ziljoe]

It could be any source of light. A light bulb , a window  etc. the light segments could be the window pains and the brighter big blur a reflection, it could be anything.

I think the context of this camera being stowed or packed when it was found suggests it wasn't used for any last minute photo of something mysterious. I would need to check the case files as I think one camera was attached to a tripod when found.

The story of a luminous orb seen at the campsite is a bit of a myth I think.

Lights were seen in the sky with rings etc but what direction , when and at what distance varies. Some were viewed from far away, 100km  perhaps or more but that doesn't mean the orbs or lights weren't 200km away or less at 50km.

The description and one of the dates seems to match the launch of a space rocket or missile . There's a thread with videos of what was probably seen by these various observer's. It's to do with sunrise and the shadow of the earth, when the rocket gets to certain height or altitude, gases can be seen and depending on the rocket , various stages might be detached. They cause rings around the burning rocket stage for example .

Many lights were observed in the sky over the Urals before and after the dyatlov pass . It's the same all over the world. At any day of the week you would probably get people reporting lights in the sky. In ww2 I'm sure people saw the V2 and doodlebug and wondered what they were?.

If you Google or look on YouTube for space x launches you will see the drama that unfolded as the citizens didn't know what they were seeing, that was a couple of years ago.

The last photo is probably the last shot being taken so the film can be wound back. If I remember correctly, sometimes you would get a couple of extra shots on the film, some times bang on. Old cameras are a bit like a bolt action rifle, you have to wind ( load ) the film before you can take a photo( shot) . The camera may have been primed to take a shot and the searchers that were to develop the film just pressed the button and it took a random shot. We can see this in the link I supplied at the very bottom.

[farelaurent]

I am now convinced that the octagonal shape is due to the aperture of the diaphragm, but this still does not explain the lights.

There is necessarily an explanation for the observed phenomenon. This explanation may be of natural origin or, more exceptionally, related to a phenomenon that is not yet understood.

Science prioritizes natural hypotheses, not by rejecting the supernatural, but because they are testable, reproducible, and falsifiable. This does not mean that other forms of explanation are impossible, only that they cannot be validated without measurable evidence.

The human mind is indeed structured to seek rational causes, as this framework allows for the construction of coherent and predictive models of reality. However, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

The hypothesis of life in another universe, endowed with an intelligence superior to ours, cannot be dismissed a priori. As long as no experimental data allows a definitive conclusion, this hypothesis remains speculative but logically acceptable, just like any other unproven explanation.

[Ziljoe]

It certainly doesn't mean I'm correct but there's probably more evidence or stronger argument for alien life in other incidents around the world.

The lights on or in the photograph represent light going through the lens at the time the shutter was open. The lens is not fully extended. That's about all we can conclude. Perhaps the shot was taken as the camera was being put back in it's case?