November 21, 2024, 07:43:10 AM
Dyatlov Pass Forum

Author Topic: Expedition to Dyatlov Pass thoughts.  (Read 17078 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

March 27, 2024, 06:27:03 PM
Read 17078 times
Online

GlennM


I think the forum would enjoy knowing what particular objectives are on the list for the next expedition. I think the forum would love to weigh in on making suggestions for objectives.

For me, an expedition searching for physical artifacts makes the most sense. Next, an exercise in measuring distances against time would be helpful in order to rule in or rule out possibilities. Third, if any Mansi lore has developed around the event, it is worth noting and reporting.
We don't have to say everything that comes into our head.
 
The following users thanked this post: amashilu

March 28, 2024, 06:46:02 AM
Reply #1
Online

amashilu

Global Moderator
Excellent questions, Glenn.
I have copied your post to the "Winter 2025 Expedition" under the subject heading "Expeditions to the Dyatlov Pass" also.
 
The following users thanked this post: GlennM

March 31, 2024, 07:39:04 AM
Reply #2
Online

GlennM


An expedition might benefit from the addition of a librarian. By this I mean someone both willing and able to find answers in the halls of records from Vizhay to Moscow. Campfire discussions will surely raise questions that need verification. Artifacts too will need authentication. Teddy could use an ally or two to lighten her burden. An on site librarian would enjoy being there to hear the questions and see the sights.

Since much has been made of geology and the link between distant blasting and a fallen tree, is there anything on or around 1079 to support proximity blasting ( to weaken an already unstable tree)? A geologist would be a welcome addition to the team.

We don't have to say everything that comes into our head.
 

March 31, 2024, 08:11:11 AM
Reply #3
Offline

Teddy

Administrator
To all members of the forum, you can check this topic to be notified, I will soon pour my soul. I am in the midst of planning how to get my ass back to the pass.
GlennM, thank you for opening the subject, but what do you mean librarian, geologist? What language, what nationality, who is paying for this dream team? I don't have money to get myself three years in a row, although I have very clear idea what to do now.
No foreigner is allowed in any archives. At the moment, not even Russians are. Even if you are, you need to know what are you looking for. And what is that?
I am currently sitting on the geology reports Igor Pavlov found (we published only some relevant pages), because I was warned that I may not get a visa. You think anyone is allowed now to rummage in documents, especially the ones that contain maps?
When you go to the pass for the first time, you are overwhelmed by your survival instincts. It takes 4-5 expeditions to find your bearings.
I didn't mean to open my mouth before I am ready to talk, but you pinched a nerve.
On an expedition it is much more useful to have someone that can lit a fire, pitch a tent, not mind the mosquitos that can bring down a drone, fight a bear, walk 3 weeks in rubber boots through swamps with 70 lbs on his back, handy with a metal detector etc.
Also a link between distant blasting and a fallen tree was never what we had in mind. I always said - the tree fell because it was time to fall.
Why did someone moved the bodies is a mystery. We are pointing a finger to the people that were working there.
My goal is to prove that there was a geologists' activity nearby, not that there is any link between their blasting and the fallen tree.
I don't believe there was.

Don't get me wrong, I am not just criticizing, I am loaded with ideas, but I need to keep in touch with reality. I have to be able to pull it off.
And this time I will ask for help.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2024, 08:45:10 AM by Teddy »
 

March 31, 2024, 03:20:29 PM
Reply #4
Online

GlennM


Teddy, thank you for a well worded response. Thank you of wanting this thread to be a portal for expedition related discussion. You stated in another thread that on your last expedition, other explorers were looking clues other than your fallen tree theory. I suggest librarian and,geologist for their skills,,such as actually accessing archives etc.

An expedition member with no skills would be a burden to others. I'm glad you make this clear for armchair experts.Is the forum a good place to set forth participant requirements? I believe you have done so in a general way.

Good,luck,with your tree fall theory. It will take some real effort to get under it to find tent, poles, firepit and anything else. Soundsmlike block and tackle work plus big levers.

Perhaps a geologist in your expedition might know how to get to other geologists who may know something to share in privacy.

I have heard that Saudi Arabians who become interested in things tend to be well funded.
We don't have to say everything that comes into our head.
 

March 31, 2024, 04:09:39 PM
Reply #5
Offline

Teddy

Administrator
I will elaborated soon, but I am not looking for a tree theory explicitly. The tree theory and my last two expeditions have thought me a very important scientific fact:
Siberia's special climate preserves things much longer than most places on Earth.
Derivative knowledge:
I know that we can read trash, and that camps used to leave lots of it. I am an expert in dating tin cans.
Any human activity used wood. We can date dead trees, even major damage on living trees i.e. when was a big branch cut or broken. It is determined with dendrology analysis of core samples.
Most importantly - I know on what depth and what class metal detector finds metal objects in the ground from 1959 - 30 cm deep around the cedar.
Amateur metal detectors did not find anything, and one sweep with a higher class found the cream can made in 1958. This is from one hour work.
I need to go back with my own metal detector to spend days in searching and digging. I also have satellite photos of possible geological sites.
But I am alone, I can't drag the whole group, they want to go to Otorten. The rule is not to go in group smaller than 3 people because of the bears. I already had my close encounter with a bear with cubs, and I am still not sure I didn't get eaten and this is all a dream.
I forgot one more skill that is very useful in a team mate - knowing the mushrooms in the Russian taiga. They are so beautiful, but can't keep away the though of Russian roulette at dinner time.











Checking for radioactivity:






« Last Edit: March 31, 2024, 05:29:08 PM by Teddy »
 

March 31, 2024, 04:20:52 PM
Reply #6
Offline

Teddy

Administrator
You have to be able to change a tire:



Not to blow up a gas bottle in your face:



ATV after bear attack:

« Last Edit: March 31, 2024, 04:26:52 PM by Teddy »
 

March 31, 2024, 04:36:01 PM
Reply #7
Offline

Teddy

Administrator
Finding things in the ground left in 1959 (this can be proved) around the cedar still doesn't mean they were left by the Dyatlov group or geologists. There are also Mansi and the searchers. Fortunately I am friends with Valery Anyamov and Askinadzi. I am going to talk to both after the expedition, show them my findings.

 
 
The following users thanked this post: KathleenDSmith1

March 31, 2024, 05:38:56 PM
Reply #8
Online

GlennM


This is excellent! You are giving the forum something to appreciate about your leadership and clear headed thinking. I only eat mushrooms from the grocery or Chinese restaurant.  Bring extra batteries for that detector. Finally, ask the forum if they can recommend sources for sponsors. If mountain climbers can get them, so should you!
We don't have to say everything that comes into our head.
 

April 02, 2024, 08:54:22 AM
Reply #9
Offline

Ziljoe


A suggestion teddy, I know each season for snow fall, temperature and winds will be different and you don't have endless resources or other groups across the community.

Could it be possible that we join resources and get even basic cameras installed at the ravine and tent location that take time lapse photos every hour or six hours for example.

It could be useful to see the build up of snow on the slope and the ravine. It might take a few years to build up data but if we can organise it on trust across the community and other forums it might help?
 

April 02, 2024, 10:07:17 AM
Reply #10
Offline

Teddy

Administrator
Finally, ask the forum if they can recommend sources for sponsors. If mountain climbers can get them, so should you!
I do not know how to get sponsors and nowadays no one wants to see their name in Russia, so forget it.
Haglöf gave me the special borrer only because I was very persuasive, but they didn't want their name showing in Russia. No one is advertising in Russia right now.
How can anyone justify giving me money that will be spend in Russia?

I will try crowdfunding. I am researching platforms, have tested 4 so far and circled back to Paypal, which are currently working on tickets I filed to fix their problems. Lots of problems. The rest of the platforms when you get to the paying part half of the screen is about their tip which is preset and you have to find the way to make it $0 and instead of thinking how much to donate you have to think why do you need to tip a third party. So I gave up on them. Paypal say they allow fundraising for personal accounts and after 3 days on the phone with their customer services, today, they admitted that the account has to be business. I have a business account, but it says you send money to my company, not me personally. I don't like that. So I am working on a workaround. I will start full blown campaign to raise money perhaps mid April. Then you will have the chance to help if not with money then by publishing the link on social media or just sending it to people that might be interested in the magic and power of the Dyatlov Pass. I will include perks. I have a plan.

A suggestion teddy, I know each season for snow fall, temperature and winds will be different and you don't have endless resources or other groups across the community.
Could it be possible that we join resources and get even basic cameras installed at the ravine and tent location that take time lapse photos every hour or six hours for example.
It could be useful to see the build up of snow on the slope and the ravine. It might take a few years to build up data but if we can organize it on trust across the community and other forums it might help?

Russians thought of that. Hard to change batteries. On the 2022 expedition Korolyov collected a camera that was suppose to take pictures only when something big moves (he was hoping for Yeti), and there was nothing interesting. The Russians have data for every season, for more than 15 years. Aleksander Aleeksenkov (Shura) has been there every winter for the last at least 15 years, taken measurements.
The Russians are all over the pass. There is data. I don't know what does it take to install a camera there and who is going to feed it with batteries and where does it send the information, but for me to actually dive into this I need to understand what will it give us. There no surprises in the weather so far. Weather is too warm, too cold... and what of it?

 

April 02, 2024, 10:17:05 AM
Reply #11
Offline

Ziljoe


I was thinking about the actual build up of snow in the ravine . If we could see the formation of the snow and if it could build a snow cave. The extreme of the of the ravine 4 being at stream level and 4 meters of snow above them is where I think the injuries came from.

Only problem is it may take years for a similar build up of snow in the ravine I guess. We can park my suggestion.  thumb1
 

April 02, 2024, 10:25:00 AM
Reply #12
Offline

Teddy

Administrator
I was thinking about the actual build up of snow in the ravine . If we could see the formation of the snow and if it could build a snow cave. The extreme of the of the ravine 4 being at stream level and 4 meters of snow above them is where I think the injuries came from.

Only problem is it may take years for a similar build up of snow in the ravine I guess. We can park my suggestion.  thumb1

Have you watched the Russian videos? Every year they are digging caves in the ravine, exactly where the bodies were.
====================================================

There are wealthy Russians, like Kireev, that would love to do something about the case. Because they can't think of anything better they pay for signs and monuments. So if there is an idea what could be done for the case on the pass, I can just forward it to them. I have direct contact. But I can not ask them to sponsor my expedition. I already have offers from Russians to pay with transport and maybe the metal detector, so all I need is money for the flight, accommodation, equipment, supplies, train etc. The Russians are helping a lot. But there are things I have to pay myself, and I still haven't paid off the credit cards where I charged my last two expeditions. All I do is balance transfers from one credit card to another. I am very deep in debt. I can't keep doing this. I am considering selling my car. Next thing will be my kidney.
 

April 02, 2024, 10:35:04 AM
Reply #13
Offline

Ziljoe


Thanks teddy, I've only seen the one where they dig a hole into the snow bank with a branch.

I'll help when I can though!
 

April 02, 2024, 11:45:02 AM
Reply #14
Offline

Teddy

Administrator
« Last Edit: April 03, 2024, 01:34:32 AM by Teddy »
 

April 02, 2024, 01:41:13 PM
Reply #15
Offline

Teddy

Administrator


This video was posted for the last week on the DyatlovPass.com home page.
You can find similar videos of the ravine from the last 10-15 years.
You can talk to the people that took the videos, they measure the snow cover, temperature, wind.
We have this information.
We also have the photos from February 1959 so we know how deep the snow was, we see how much the trees roots were covered.
The snow in the ravine is deep but "рыхлый", which translates as light, loose, not heavy and wet.
Oleg Taymen says that he can't see how snow like that can cause any injuries or suffocate you.
 

April 02, 2024, 06:03:18 PM
Reply #16
Online

GlennM


I feel that when your boots are on the ground, you will be better able to judge if getting to Ortoten is best done by the ridge route or the forest route. We accept that the hikers actually crossed over at a higher elevation than Dyatlov Pass, owing to the location of the labaz.
We don't have to say everything that comes into our head.
 

April 03, 2024, 12:29:58 AM
Reply #17
Offline

Teddy

Administrator
I am now preparing for a summer expedition. Things are not the same.
Even if i went there in winter, I wouldn't try to comprehend what they did judging by what I feel right.
I would say this and that and it won't proof anything. It won't amount to anything.
The only thing I am good at is finding things.
Have you seen what is there in the ground? Tin cans, axes, nails, utensils, batteries, you name it. They can be dated. See Oleg Taymen's videos in this playlist.

Watch Part 6 and 7
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYXGTlOLpQ4tgwJzXqxApUGb7IU-ocJz2

I am not expert in behavioral analysis, what I say doesn't matter.
Kuryakov had two behavioral experts and they they produced complete nonsense.
Seriously, going there and seeing it with your eyes does not solve anything.
The only things all the researchers, from all nationalities, agree on is when something is found. Objects, we need objects where there shouldn't be.
This is what I think.

How many people have said I wouldn't pitch a tent there in winter? Equal number of people have said - no big deal. So what does it matter what I say. I have said it, changed nothing.
 
« Last Edit: April 03, 2024, 01:30:27 AM by Teddy »
 

April 03, 2024, 05:02:58 PM
Reply #18
Offline

Partorg


Quote from: GlennM
I feel that when your boots are on the ground, you will be better able to judge if getting to Ortoten is best done by the ridge route or the forest route
In order to understand which of the two routes (along the Ridge or along the valley) was more preferable for DG (requiring less time and effort) you need to have your boots on the snow and not on the ground. ))
Here is footage that gives some idea of ​​it
This is a video chronicle of a ski trip of a group led by Sergey Markov, organized by the Ural Television Agency in 1999. The route and time of the hike are completely identical to the 1959 DG hike.

https://youtu.be/vo1EVxh8cRQ?si=57d_h2WcOVRL5ZUH   (Part 1)

35:05 - 35:35 ;   35:50 - 40:29;   42:28 - 44:26;   46:29 - 46:54 – Movement up the Auspiya from the mouth to the Pass.
46:55 - exit to the saddle of the Pass and search for the Tent Site.
49:22 - construction of a windproof wall on the slope.

https://youtu.be/4V0NnXL5t_k?si=GKDTcUUtEgjTfOjr (Part 2)
26:10 - February 3. 10 a.m.  Exit to the traverse to Otorten, but getting caught in a snowstorm and deciding to wait it out in the forest, on the western slope of Kholat-Syakhl at the source of the Bolshaya Khozya River.
28:52 - February 4. 9 a.m.  Climbing the Ridge and moving along it to Otorten. Solar halo.
31:00 - 3 p.m. At the top of Otorten. Return to the Pass with an overnight stay in the valley of the 2nd tributary of the river Lozva.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2024, 02:34:57 PM by Partorg »
 
The following users thanked this post: Ziljoe

April 03, 2024, 05:19:22 PM
Reply #19
Offline

Ziljoe


Excellent video. Missing subtitles unfortunately but you can see the effort of traveling through the forest . A bit frustrating not to know what is said but very interesting to see.
 

April 03, 2024, 05:59:25 PM
Reply #20
Offline

Partorg


Yes, but there is no particularly useful information in the audio. Listing well-known facts, voicing materials from a criminal case, reading diaries...  Routine.
 

April 03, 2024, 06:03:23 PM
Reply #21
Offline

Ziljoe


I recommend people give the above videos a quick watch. It gives an idea of the conditions. Would love to know what the conclusions were.

I noticed that the snow is extremely hard/solid on the exposed slopes. So the searcher's chipping away at the tent makes perfect sense. No foot prints seem to be made in that kind of hard snow....so that brings me back to the time of the incident. There must have been a layer of fresh snow , over 150 mm deep,  minimum ,on top of the hard snow for the foot prints to occur. There must be a humidity or temperature change also. I'll need to find the correct thread to continue.
 

April 03, 2024, 06:05:54 PM
Reply #22
Offline

Ziljoe


Thanks Partorg, I was thinking that. I was seeing the same old photos etc. The squeak of the snow has left my hair standing.
 

April 03, 2024, 08:55:04 PM
Reply #23
Online

GlennM


Agreed, excellent video. Clearly there is nothing to be gained by approaching Otorten through the woods. Trekking on the barren ridge makes abundant sense, but is a gamble. The trade off for speed is to travel light and hope the weather holds. It would seem that the hikers wanted to do just that, but were defeated by the wind, snow, fog and darkness. We understand they plowed snow to get from civilization to their last camp. It was tiring work. Who would choose to go into a forest full of obstacles and deep snow when there was an alternative?

I have to commend anyone in the forum who braves the crazy cold to live, work and recreate in snow. I think the romance of the idea  must be stronger than the real hardships. The hardships are considerable.
We don't have to say everything that comes into our head.
 

May 23, 2024, 09:21:22 AM
Reply #24
Offline

Teddy

Administrator
I have received a suggestion for the expedition:
Quote
If possible bring a magnetometer and plot the Earth's magnetic field to discover any anomalies. Strong magnetic fields can affect the human body.

Measurements have been taken in August 2020 by the legendary researcher Aleksander Aleeksenkov (Shura), who has been on the pass countless times.
https://dyatlovpass.com/appendix-zone

The discovery brings credibility to our theory: https://dyatlovpass.com/1079#magnetic
« Last Edit: May 23, 2024, 09:48:46 AM by Teddy »
 

May 26, 2024, 11:15:18 AM
Reply #25
Offline

WAB


I have received a suggestion for the expedition:
Quote
If possible bring a magnetometer and plot the Earth's magnetic field to discover any anomalies. Strong magnetic fields can affect the human body.

Measurements have been taken in August 2020 by the legendary researcher Aleksander Aleeksenkov (Shura), who has been on the pass countless times.
https://dyatlovpass.com/appendix-zone

This has already been written and discussed on several forums, including this one. It seems that it has either been forgotten or deliberately neglected the results and conclusions already obtained.

The discovery brings credibility to our theory: https://dyatlovpass.com/1079#magnetic

What “discovery” are we talking about?
The same forum has already written about this “discovery”. Is it not possible even for you to realize what it represents on the physical level and how it affects man, nature and the events being studied?
OK, I will briefly repeat myself, by way of summary and explanation.
1. Unevenness of the magnetic field in different places is quite a common condition in nature. It is especially characteristic of the Urals, where significant deposits of iron ores are unevenly placed. The values of the magnetic field strength can be very different (in numerical value) from what is located nearby. This was observed in the measurements made by Shura.
By the way, it was in a very small area to talk about any “anomaly”.
For example, does a “storm in a glass” have anything to do with meteorology?
2. The results of Shura's measurements are such that even the highest field strength values are about 100,000...800,000 times less than that which can have a noticeable effect on the magnetic compass arrow. As for the effect on a human being, you have to have an increase of several orders of magnitude more. Question: what in this case do you want to get in this expedition?
3. Shura rented a professional magnetometer of a very high level. And he received it practically free of charge. It was a scientific interest of someone from the geological institutes of Ekaternburg. The cost of such a magnetometer is not less than ~ $2000 (>~200,000 rubles) - these are the cheapest copies. The rental cost for a month will be about 5...10%, or will be somewhat cheaper and additionally will require an insurance deposit.
4. There is a serious magnetic anomaly 50 km south, in the area of Mount Chistop. There the iron ores are closer to the surface and have a higher concentration. This was manifested in the fact that radio-electronic equipment failed during thunderstorms (the increase in electric field strength is stimulated by the presence of a powerful magnetic field). But no physiological influence on a person was fixed, though psychological deviations in some people were revealed. In connection with what were such deviations was not revealed. It could be both purely individual reactions to a stressful working regime (military service) and unknown psychological individual reactions to such phenomena. But these were not mass or large in number. These were isolated phenomena. Nothing like this has been observed in the area of Mt. 1079 (Holtchakhl) so far.

By way of summary: it makes sense to consider - is it worth doing such an action and what do you want to get out of it? Although preliminary measurements and their results are already available. What is required is a result at least several orders of magnitude more significant.
Do you think it is realistic to get such a result?
 

May 26, 2024, 12:03:23 PM
Reply #26
Offline

Teddy

Administrator
By way of summary: it makes sense to consider - is it worth doing such an action and what do you want to get out of it? Although preliminary measurements and their results are already available. What is required is a result at least several orders of magnitude more significant.
Do you think it is realistic to get such a result?

I don't know how to move this post in this topic: Magnetic anomaly called "Appendix zone"
Otherwise I would have done it.
The word discovery is used not in the sense of now but ever.
I have no intention to measure the magnetic field. This is done by Aleksander Aleeksenkov (Shura) already.
I am going with a professional metal detector looking for metal objects in the ground that prove activity that hasn't been accounted for till now. My experience in 2022 showed that the amateur class metal detectors did not catch the tin can under the cedar made in 1958. There could be more items. And even if it is hard to prove who left the items under the cedar in 1959 I plan to go to other locations to look for presence of other parties besides the searchers. I have a Google map with suspicions clearings in the forest. We now know exactly where the searchers camps were in the winter and spring of 1959. I believe that there were geologist also prospecting nearby because of the magnetic anomaly that was registered on the maps Igor Pavlov and I provided: https://dyatlovpass.com/1079#magnetic

Bottom line: I don't care what magnetic measurements we can get today. To me it is important that in 1959 the Northern Geological Expedition believed that there were sufficient such magnetic anomalies worth looking for something in the ground. What is important is their presence in the area, not the magnetic anomaly itself.