It's very simple to understand, Ziljoe. You assume that the official version is true and I am false. ¿Do I have to convince you otherwise?, no, because everyone chooses their own path. The bottom line is that the Dyatlov Pass was, is, and will continue to be a state secret that not even Yeltsin himself, with Perestroika + glasnot, could reveal, and that together with his wife they studied at the same university as the students. Likewise, the relatives of the victims wrote to Putin and washed their hands of it. In addition, on January 1, 2021, Prime Minister Mikhail Mishutin approved by legislative decree new tax regulations to expand and perpetuate said state secrets. From a legal point of view, the case will only be resolved if criminal proceedings are initiated by the relatives of the victims. In this process, the official exhumation is key to validating or refuting those that were carried out in 1959. But there is a problem that in the conference for the 64th anniversary of the tragedy, Professor Bartolomew stated, and that is that, due to longevity, they are the people involved die and there is a risk that the case will be lost in oblivion or in commemorative acts and not in critical investigation. Years ago, I told Yuri Kuntsevich that I personally paid for a drone to check the explosion crater. I also told Teddy last year and got no response from the two of us. There they...
Source: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202111020035?index=0&rangeSize=1
Greetings.
Hi cib
You assume that I think the official version was true and also assume that I think your version is false.
What I think , is that the official version is all they can conclude. The case files are contradictive , the evidence poorly documented and I believe this is within the realms of genuine good intentions. The search/ rescue of 9 people
The case files are extremely open, it's so natural in its flow of miscommunication and contradictions by eye witnesses that it has a lot of credibility .
I can't see why dog bites were not reported when fractured skulls were , the nurse would have said in her later statements that they had dog bites. I personally think it's impossible to look at an old black a white photo and say it was a dog bite, especially one that has been submerged in water and exposed to frostbite.
The case may remain a state secret for two reasons.
1) perhaps there is no secret. We have everything that the authorities have .
2) that the state are protecting other secrets that could expose Russias security.
I am opened minded but have yet to read, hear or see anything conclusive against the official version. Not one witness at the time has said anything that factually says otherwise. They all speculate in their statements that It could of been this or that. They were all there at different times and different locations swapping their own observations
amoungst each other by word of mouth.
It is frustrating .