You have been posting photo's of Rustem's frozen face to suggest that he had been so badly beaten that he was unrecognisable. You then suggested he had a broken nose, which he didn't. You've suggested he had a bite to his face, and any pathologist would identify such a wound as a bite, even if they sometimes cannot determine if it was human or animal. And then you're trying to imply that
1. I assumed that Rustem died in a fight, because the photo speaks eloquently about it: the face is swollen, a hematoma on the face, a swollen eye.
2. I assumed that Rustem had dog bites on his face. If you disagree, then explain the origin of these serious wounds.
3. I did not assume, but I read in the forensic medical examination that there are traces of blood from the nasal openings. About a broken nose – these are your fantasies.
4. I did not assume, but I read in the forensic medical examination that there is a crack in the skull, plus the divergence of the skull bones.
5. I did not assume from the photo, but I read in the forensic medical examination that. the brain has the form of a shapeless mass.
My opinion: Rustem died resisting the liquidators.
You are the "truther" who fantasises that the KGB would take seriously rumours a group of young hikers were going to defect from central Russia during a perilous winter hike, and with only several week's worth of food, and so they headed out there to brutally murder them all in a kangaroo court. To bolster this you look for any evidence of attack, and if you cannot find it you will manufacture it.
In post 17, unless a translation error, you mentioned Rustem's
broken nose. That's why I quoted the pathologist stating his nose was straight. He would see the blood and manipulate the nose with his fingers to see if it was fractured. He did not have access to x-ray.
Elsewhere you've suggested, in order to explain the difference between the frozen and unfrozen appearance of Rustem, that the unfrozen photo's have been doctored with Photoshop, that they do not match the originals. But they are taken from the resources at this site, and they will originate from the Hibina files.
When a man is found dead with his face in the snow his face will have snow and any crud stuck to it, and when his body has thawed and perhaps his face has been wiped over, he will look very different and what may have appeared as a bite will have gone. This, logically, is why the autopsy does not mention any bite.
You've then implied that Rustem's brain was found to be an unshapen mass because he had been beaten about the head, as if his skull caved in all over and his brain was pulped. Rustem had
one fracture to his skull, and haemorrhage to his temporal
muscles on either side. This is what the pathologist said of Rustem's skull:
"There is a bone fracture from the left temporal bone along the direction of the upper forward area of the lobular bone with dehiscence of 0.1 cm and a length of up to 6 cm. The fracture is 1.5 cm from the sagittal suture. In addition to this, there is a discrepancy in the joint temporal-parietal suture on the left and right /post-mortem/. The dura mater is bluish in color, and its vessels are slightly filled with blood. There was 75 cm3 of bloody liquid under the dura mater. The pia is cloudy and red green in color. The brain matter appears as an unformed mass that is green red in color with undifferentiated contours of the ventricles, as well as the white and grey matter. In the upper area of the left pyramid there is hemorrhaging under the left bone plate with a size of 0.3 x 0.4 cm. The bones of the skull base are whole."