Nitrogen dioxide slowly converts to Nitric acid on contact

[Star man]

Yet another report of an white/black/orange ufo...
http://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/2-see-triangular-ufo-with-orange-plume-above-it/#

Did this one swoop down and chase people around a mountain attacking several times at several locations?

You're confusing the NO2 theory with the fire orb theory.

Orange orb look like sun light that has just managed to sneak its way through a small gap in some dense dark clouds.

[Nigel Evans]

Yet another report of an white/black/orange ufo...
http://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/2-see-triangular-ufo-with-orange-plume-above-it/#

Did this one swoop down and chase people around a mountain attacking several times at several locations?

You're confusing the NO2 theory with the fire orb theory.

Orange orb look like sun light that has just managed to sneak its way through a small gap in some dense dark clouds.

Curious that it's always the same colours white/orange/black.

[Loose}{Cannon]

Yet another report of an white/black/orange ufo...
http://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/2-see-triangular-ufo-with-orange-plume-above-it/#

Did this one swoop down and chase people around a mountain attacking several times at several locations?

You're confusing the NO2 theory with the fire orb theory.

Or, I know your Piloted Fireball theory is now based on it creating NO2, and NO2 welp...... 

Nitrogen dioxide slowly converts to Nitric acid on contact

[Loose}{Cannon]

Yet another report of an white/black/orange ufo...
http://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/2-see-triangular-ufo-with-orange-plume-above-it/#

Did this one swoop down and chase people around a mountain attacking several times at several locations?

You're confusing the NO2 theory with the fire orb theory.

Orange orb look like sun light that has just managed to sneak its way through a small gap in some dense dark clouds.

Looks to me like what I see looking at dark clouds through my dining room window when the kitchen light is on behind me.   

[Nigel Evans]

A fire orb with an orange plume....
http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/2014/11/unknown-red-sphere-like-object.html

[Loose}{Cannon]

A fire orb with an orange plume....
http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/2014/11/unknown-red-sphere-like-object.html

How many people did this one chase down to kill, and how many times at how many locations?

[Nigel Evans]

A fire orb with an orange plume....
http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/2014/11/unknown-red-sphere-like-object.html

How many people did this one chase down to kill, and how many times at how many locations?

325 plus or minus a significant number possibly like 325...

[Nigel Evans]

That's a guess btw.

[Loose}{Cannon]

Did it actually kill people?

[Nigel Evans]

Did it actually kill people?

Why is this relevant to the DPI?

[Loose}{Cannon]

Bingo?

 

[Nigel Evans]

Bingo?

 

@LooseLogic - i am reinforcing the premise of this thread that electro magnetism is known to create nitrogen oxides, by posting photographic evidence of other events that fit this premise. Given their altitude it is unlikely that these other events would result in casualties.
 

[Loose}{Cannon]

Perhaps you can check out the forum rules.  In particular, rule 8.

8. Trolling(name calling/bullying/pushing buttons) won't be tolerated. A fun razzing is one thing, but taunting is another.

In addition, this is general discussion under 'theories' of the DP Forum.   So I would expect your 'Nitrogen turns to bork bork' has something to do with the death of 9 hikers within Russia 1959.  Asking if these atmospheric phenomena you presume to be genuine has killed anyone and if so, how many people etc, is 100% relevant and on-topic. 

[Nigel Evans]

Perhaps you can check out the forum rules.  In particular, rule 8.
8. Trolling(name calling/bullying/pushing buttons) won't be tolerated. A fun razzing is one thing, but taunting is another.
I'm all for online rules and staying within them.
In addition, this is general discussion under 'theories' of the DP Forum.   So I would expect your 'Nitrogen turns to bork bork' has something to do with the death of 9 hikers within Russia 1959.  Asking if these atmospheric phenomena you presume to be genuine has killed anyone and if so, how many people etc, is 100% relevant and on-topic.

.
The theory is that Yuri D died directly from NO2 inhalation and NO2 is one of the very few explanations for the orange brown hands and faces seen at the funeral..
 This theory is also a fit for the Chivruay event, which afaik has no other explanation.
.
It also explains why the hill is given the name "Dead Mountain"..
It explains the sastrugi and persistent footsteps and provides a theory for the ravine deaths..And of course the big one is it explains why they left the tent so quickly..Including N2O in the theory provides a fit for :-."Ortorten News".Wasted matches.Deciding to climb a tree and then falling out of it..Afaik this is the best theory for the DPI...Also can i suggest that 'Nitrogen turns to bork bork' is taunting and contravenes Rule 8....   

[Loose}{Cannon]

Also can i suggest that 'Nitrogen turns to bork bork' is taunting and contravenes Rule 8....   

No, short-handing with bork bork, bla bla, or etc etc is in no way shape or form a violation of rule #8.  Trolling/taunting the staff with immature hashtags names however is, especially when unprovoked.  If you go back and read my post, I only asked a simple and very basic question.   

[Nigel Evans]

Also can i suggest that 'Nitrogen turns to bork bork' is taunting and contravenes Rule 8....   

No, short-handing with bork bork, bla bla, or etc etc is in no way shape or form a violation of rule #8.  Trolling/taunting the staff with immature hashtags names however is, especially when unprovoked.  If you go back and read my post, I only asked a simple and very basic question.

It's good to know your bork borks from your bla blas...
Moving on.
The NO2 theory also explains why after exiting the tent they appear to have stood for awhile some distance away. It explains the enlarged aortas and the close grouping of the returning three. It explains Semyon's photos, it explains Ivanov's fire orbs.

It's the one to beat...

[sarapuk]

Also can i suggest that 'Nitrogen turns to bork bork' is taunting and contravenes Rule 8....   

No, short-handing with bork bork, bla bla, or etc etc is in no way shape or form a violation of rule #8.  Trolling/taunting the staff with immature hashtags names however is, especially when unprovoked.  If you go back and read my post, I only asked a simple and very basic question.

It's good to know your bork borks from your bla blas...
Moving on.
The NO2 theory also explains why after exiting the tent they appear to have stood for awhile some distance away. It explains the enlarged aortas and the close grouping of the returning three. It explains Semyon's photos, it explains Ivanov's fire orbs.

It's the one to beat...

How can you say for certain that they stood for a while some distance from the Tent  !  ?  How can you be certain that it explains the enlarged aortas  !  ?  How can you be certain that it explains Semyons photos  !  ?    How can you be certain that it explains Ivanovs alleged so called Fire orbs  !  ? 

[Loose}{Cannon]

Piloted Fireballs to be exact.   

[Nigel Evans]

Also can i suggest that 'Nitrogen turns to bork bork' is taunting and contravenes Rule 8....   

No, short-handing with bork bork, bla bla, or etc etc is in no way shape or form a violation of rule #8.  Trolling/taunting the staff with immature hashtags names however is, especially when unprovoked.  If you go back and read my post, I only asked a simple and very basic question.

It's good to know your bork borks from your bla blas...
Moving on.
The NO2 theory also explains why after exiting the tent they appear to have stood for awhile some distance away. It explains the enlarged aortas and the close grouping of the returning three. It explains Semyon's photos, it explains Ivanov's fire orbs.

It's the one to beat...

How can you say for certain that they stood for a while some distance from the Tent  !  ?  How can you be certain that it explains the enlarged aortas  !  ?  How can you be certain that it explains Semyons photos  !  ?    How can you be certain that it explains Ivanovs alleged so called Fire orbs  !  ? 

I can't be certain. But the theory has an explanation for these things (unlike most theories which can't explain half of them...).

[Loose}{Cannon]

Heck, I can come up with a theory about Smurfs that explains everything, but that wouldn't make it true.

[Nigel Evans]

Heck, I can come up with a theory about Smurfs that explains everything, but that wouldn't make it true.

Plausible theory...

[sarapuk]

Nigel. You say and I quote  ''I can't be certain. But the theory has an explanation for these things (unlike most theories which can't explain half of them...).''  Thats fair enough, but would still not be enough to convince a JURY in a Court Of Law in England, thats for sure. The Jury would struggle with the notion of FIRE ORBS ie what exactly are they  1 ?  Still no scientific definition.

[Nigel Evans]

Nigel. You say and I quote  ''I can't be certain. But the theory has an explanation for these things (unlike most theories which can't explain half of them...).''  Thats fair enough, but would still not be enough to convince a JURY in a Court Of Law in England, thats for sure. The Jury would struggle with the notion of FIRE ORBS ie what exactly are they  1 ?  Still no scientific definition.

Ball lightning attracts theories from eminent physicists...

[Loose}{Cannon]

And incompetent investigators. 

[Nigel Evans]

And incompetent investigators.

Who presented evidence to the Central Committee of the Soviet Union that convinced them to take highly unusual steps, confiscating evidence, ordering a coverup. Okishev thought it was a unique situation without any parallel.

[Loose}{Cannon]

Really?

Awesome....  show me this evidence or proof he submitted anything other then the case files we are all familiar with. 

Its a loosing argument when you have to fabricate events.

[Nigel Evans]

Really?

Awesome....  show me this evidence or proof he submitted anything other then the case files we are all familiar with. 

Its a loosing argument when you have to fabricate events.

You know perfectly well that Ivanov and Okishev state that the evidence was confiscated?

[Loose}{Cannon]

confiscating evidence, ordering a coverup

Your right....  The paranoid Russians of 1959 would never do anything like that unless is was the only resort.     

And you have no clue whether or not there was a cover-up.  Your issue is blatant Nigel.  You treat wild conjecture with zero substantial supporting evidence as if they were fact, then preach said 'facts' as if true which fuels misconceptions, and misinformation.

[Loose}{Cannon]

Really?

Awesome....  show me this evidence or proof he submitted anything other then the case files we are all familiar with. 

Its a loosing argument when you have to fabricate events.

You know perfectly well that Ivanov and Okishev state that the evidence was confiscated?

Confiscated...   lol.

Whatever term you want to use as the case was taken from them, yes.  How exactly does that prove anything you state above?

[Nigel Evans]

confiscating evidence, ordering a coverup

And you have no clue whether or not there was a cover-up. 

What are you talking about? Both Ivanov and Okishev clearly stated in interviews that there was a coverup.