I have some specifications:
Best of luck with the show, i'll have to miss it as it starts at 4am GMT. Unless it's recorded?
Regarding your facts, i'd offer the following corrections (in red) :-
The tent had been cut open from within.
Nothing was stolen from the tent - money, food, alcohol, clothes, shoes, backpacks, gear, all this would have been very useful and wasn't cheap and accessible at the time.
The two girls died virgin.
No alcohol was found in any of the deceased.
There were no indications of other people nearby on Kholat Syakhl apart from the nine hikers.
No traces of avalanche were apparent or reported in the area.
Footprints from the camp showed that all group members left the tent of their own accord, on foot, in an orderly way, nobody was running, limping, stumbling, dragged or falling on their way down the slope.
Forensic pathologist Dr Vozrozhdenny stated that the fatal injuries of three of the bodies could not have been caused by another human being, "because the force of the blows had been too strong and no soft tissue had been damaged".
Some clothes showed radioactive contamination that could not be attributed to an environmental exposure. We don't know that. A completely plausible theory is that they picked up contamination from exploring disused mines. Yudin was a geologist?[/color]
No. It not a plausible explanation. Yudin studied on economic branch of university UPI.
It is the most probable that contamination having radiation was a soil part on which secondary deposits from tests of the nuclear weapon in 1958 on island Novaya Zemlya dropped out. That year many tests in atmosphere have been spent and there was a carrying over to atmosphere in the form of a dust and a deposit in the form of a rain. Radiation background was very small. The maximum background was approximately 9900 disintegrations in a minute, from the area of 150 sq. sm that is only 166 Bq (Becquerel). Or it is ~ 66 Bq on 1 sq. sm. For example, 1,3 kg of bananas on isotope K40
have such activity.
Contamination had more likely alluvial character. That is small fragments of radioactive deposits were washed off in a stream and this soil намывалась on separate fragments of clothes. Many other fragments of clothes had no background excess above than it there was a natural background.
It is not excluded (but it is improbable) and that could bring it not to clothes Yury Krivonishchenko (it worked at industrial complex "Majak" near Chelyabinsk when there for 1 year prior to the beginning of its work there was a large nuclear failure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyshtym_disaster
) or Alexander Kolevatov (he studied on branch of nuclear physics and technics UPI and did lab work with presence radioactive materials).
Hikers were wearing the clothes from other members of the group. This is normal if presume the latter were dead already, but i still can't comprehend why Zolotaryov was wearing Lyudmila's hat and coat - they were dying together seem like it, and with similar injuries.Because the pathologist said she died quickly (max 10mins) and Semyon took longer to die (say 30mins), so her clothing was given to Semyon, simple.
Facts that are hugely blown out of proportion and context, things that are arguably facts or that can be explained:
Frame №17 from Tibo camera
Frame №34 from Krivo camera
Fire balls in the sky reported in February and March 1959
Where the tent was pitched (did they drift or get lost) Or was it intentional as suggested by Igor's last entry in the diary
Lyuda's missing tongue
Missing eyes on Lyuda and Zolotaryov
Orange skin reported at the funerals in March 1959 Imo this skin colour and Yuri D's foaming cheek are quite significant and reinforced by Chivruay. [/color]
I have not understood. What exactly proves to be true with Chivruey?
More bodies reported at the Ivdel morgue
It is hearings which were informed by Pelagea Solter at the age of 90 years. They anything, except its words do not prove to be true. Wrong messages have been found in conversations with it more many.
Bodies reported being seen from the search helicopters lying around the tent
It too gossips which have appeared because of the journalist. Because of that that he has not correctly understood pilot Karpushin. The body on a slope (among stones) cannot be seen during flight for 30 kilometres from hill. You read article oneself? You have understood all in it very well?
Besides, participants of searches did not see on a slope of any body, and almost all bodies have been completely covered by snow.
Pilots of search helicopters being sabotaged and killed in the following years[/i]
It in general set of gossips which are scattered in a dust as soon as you start to analyze all these failures in detail.
Also i'd add :-
Ivanov and his superior state that after the discovery of the last bodies in May the order came to move all evidence to a secret archive and makeup a cover story and create an official report to support it. I think this fact flatly rules out a normal civilian murder case.
It is wrong. Case never no was confidential, because the decision was not made what to make its confidential.
Case have simply put in confidential archive that the small quantity of people could read it. Because the consequence could not give exact the answer to a question: that there is a reason of the beginning of this case. If on this question there is no answer in 60 years after why they should be cleverer or possess the big knowledge then?
For me Ivanov's use of the term "fire orbs" is hugely significant. Q. Where did an experienced criminal investigator and barrister get this from, just a wild guess? A. No, from the confiscated evidence - perhaps the missing frames in Semyon's camera.
you don't mention that Semyon's camera frames can be interpreted as night shots of self illuminating aerial objects one of which is a perfect fit for the fireball reports (there are other theories such as water damage of course)
The film of Simeon's camera could not remain. Because its camera was in water long time. If who that of readers of a forum was engaged in a chemical photo (shooting on a film and chemical processing) should know that:
1.Emulsion of films get sodden it will be washed off by water
2.Even if it not so transportation and processing of this film will be almost impossible because it слипнется on air and it will be impossible to develop without fatal damage.