I'm not anybody's "little girl" & I think you've got it wrong who is the meglamanic. I will be using the utmost restraint replying to your ridiculous diatribe.
1.You in vain try "be deciphered", who you and you that from yourselves represent in the given theme, it was clear at once after perusal of pair texts. For this purpose it is not necessary be the psychologist even initial level. Was make the elementary semantic analysis (simply attentively, and with sense, read you texts) enough what it understand. Also behave you as that "little girl". A hysterics which you here have gone at once as soon as with you have disagreed are it is very characteristic. It is necessary so be substituted?. Have dirtied forum that minimum six times were confused in the same elementary action …
And again there are constant attempts “for whom that to hide”. For example, once again:
“My spouse advances you on mile!”
We not speak about it, and we speak about you. You that can show in this respect? And it is interesting to me, where he was at war? Really, it is only in Washington? It is what be compared to me …
Case has reached even that you cannot normally format the text on the Internet or will quickly learn, as it is necessary do it.
It is your intelligence about which you here so pathosly spoke?
Hardly more adult girls master such things in some minutes.
Absolutely not clearly, how with such abilities you could work in FBI?
Or you will accuse again others that do: constantly “urinate boiled water”?
I have no idea what you're talking about!
2.It is absolute true. You about what that here is told on theme, have no the slightest concept. Neither about features of area actions, nor about natural factors, about specificity of that, than Dyatlov group, that was in life during that time was engaged. I have asked the basic (key) question:
«A control question:
Describe signs of the "explosions" which have been found out in participants Dyatlov group? And as show, where and as traces from these "explosions" have been found out on district.
And it will be examination on your qualification and truthfulness.
For now it is not revealed and it is not confirmed authentically, it is not necessary give out the imaginations as "facts". »©
Actually it is here 2 questions: 1. Explosion signs on district? 2. Signs of traumas from explosion on bodies victims?
You have left from these questions, and they are criterion of reliability of your statements.
But to them you not condition answer. Because it do not know and at all have not read competently reports of the judicial doctor. And consequently that it is impossible find in both these places of that is not present, and never was. There are there no signs of explosions. Neither on district, nor on bodies.
That you want: understand that there has occurred, or at any cost drag the false opinion?
Therefore it turns out that you give not trustworthy information, and the inventions. If you want tell so that it is normal for FBI, it is discredit this “your” bureau.
I think that it there work not so. Thorough studying of all components There is required. You have not found time even to check up reliability of that put forward as the theory. And as reliability of sources the information, and at once do accusatory conclusions. Such approach from normal people is called as forgery.
You in the same way worked in the agency?
Are you mad? I have the utmost respect in my post to all other persons field of knowledge. At the end of the day someone must put the pieces of the puzzle (investigation/examination) together so the case may be resolved..
I have understood all. You could not understand that thought at all which to you have told. It is necessary notice that thus your intelligence “above the sky”.
Probably, you have found only familiar letters in the text, and to connect them in has washed off the text at you any more there was no "intelligence". It is happens all.
There is no this imaginary respect. Because instead of the analysis events and their signs on the nature you have false opinions with in advance thought up conclusions are offered.
You suggest collect puzzle from your false "slices"?
How dare you disrespect not only me but the position I held. I have been very careful not to disclose my agency or my rank/position. Nowhere have I or others on this forum contradict the facts of DPI
The one who gives unreliable information has not respect.. And not the one who insists that it unique correct only because it occupied what that a post, and knows nothing that speaks. The respect has the one who gives the authentic and competent information You do not have any trustworthy information directly from place, there is no it from initial documents, and there is no it from direct participants of events (except victims). At me it is all is. Therefore I and you such different opinions. Attempt without adducing any proof deny those facts that is in documents and on place, leads distortion of straight lines and established facts and their substitution by "you himself". In forum heading there is such record: «Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. ― Daniel Patrick Moynihan» © Read it, can be that will help that understand? Though, I have doubt it.
The fact you completely ignore I'm sadly a bereaved parent speaks volumes about your character.
About your character says even more that you are ready present the lies to grieving parents, instead of what is tactful, quiet and without haste inform truth. You do not think that will be when they later will receive truth. I am some times, had do it in the same cases, as DPI, after the and searches. All of them understood correctly.
We are on friendly terms with some relatives already more than 40 years. But you it understand not in condition.
And you impose your opinion, at all without knowing, who such Tatyana Perminova, and that she would like hear. Also replace her opinion to you - false. It is too called substitution of concepts to false. I was at she together with Kuntsevich and we spoke quite as friendly. With she the Fund constantly works. And here that is not required whose demagogical interventions of extraneous persons which anything cannot help but only are engaged in insignificant talks.
Ya know, this site was friendly, respectiful, & good discussions. So please, I emplore you, go crawl back under your rock & let the rest of us get back to the intended spirit of this forum.
It is one more continuation of demagogy. If you yet have not understood, I speak directly: you have received in the answer “delivery by the same money with which tried pay”. And not I began this confrontation. If you would want that treated kindly you, arrive as it.
As speak in boxing: “you are not able hold Blow” © therefore these are audible your squeal and the boorish reference.
Probably you have got used to weak opponents who cannot oppose you anything. Wean, this time has passed.
It is not necessary worry about forum, here many more cleverer people, than you. Not all want to be puppies of agents FBI.
That you have deserved, and it receive. And this your lies about the reasons of events as result of "explosions" and remains lies, and it will not change anything.