Ok so your saying.....
ionisation produced by the snowstorm leads to microwave energy wich produces two things.
#1 visual light phenomena
#2 nitrogen oxides which drift downwind as a hot poisonous/intoxicating mist.
Almost :-ionisation produced by the snowstorm leads to
#1 visual light phenomena (discharging ion streams such as plane1, plane2).
#2 microwave energy producing nitrogen oxides which drift downwind as a hot poisonous/intoxicating mist.
#3 cloud to cloud and cloud to ground lightning producing ball lightning (fire orbs).
That snow storms create ionisation is well understood - checkout thundersnow.
#2 and #3 are within the orbit of conventional science, the paper from Prof Wu published in the magazine Nature discusses these points.
Not sure how much #1 is accepted but i've posted what seems to be good empirical evidence (e.g. quebec object).