There is one important thing about Yetis and Bigfoots.
They do not exist, but that is not the important thing.
What is important, is that these (nonexistent) creatures never, ever kill humans.
Do you have proof that they do not exist ! ?
For whatever reason you keep posting this logical fallacy all over again. Burden of proof is in on your side if you claim it exists. That's it.
Using your logic I could say whatever bullshit and present it as the truth until somebody proves me wrong. That makes no sense whatsoever.
I have definitive proof Sasquatch exists at least in the southwest US.
Roughly 95% of any claimed human encounters the Sasquatch quickly flee vs. being a monstrous killer.
IMO by whatever name you want to call a Yeti/Menk/ etc. I do think it may be possible presence but most likely because of curiosity vs. intended harm.
I referred to the logical fallacy as such. One cannot just ask for a proof of non existence of an entity that is not even defined properly. Burden of proof is on the other side.
As for the yeti (or whatever name we use), I do not refute the statements of people who claim to have encountered an ape-like creature. But it still might be a weird looking ape or human, not necessarily another species. The humans vary a lot in terms of appearance, size, weight etc... we can expect the same among apes. Unless we define properly what yeti is and produce evidence of its existence, I prefer being sceptical.
The most common definition of that 'species' I came across says that yeti is a hybrid of human and an ape (don't know which particular species, never got a proper answer). It should be possible to test whether such 'combination' is even biologically possible.
I checked out this page recently, somebody posted it on this forum. http://sasquatchgenomeproject.org/sasquatch_genome_project_007.htm
There are alleged eye witnesses of yeti including a guy who claims to be visiting them regularly. I just cannot get my head around the fact that he was not able to produce single picture or video of the yeti over all these years. I would understand that few years ago.. but come on, everybody has a camera phone today. If for nothing else, than for the sake of one's reputation those people better start to produce some evicence other than hair samples with questionable origin and blurry pictures in which everybody sees what they want to.
Anybody with proper evidence is very welcome to produce it.