Reply #8
..........................
it makes no sense to leave corpses to be discovered. Discovery leads to cause of death investigation, which leads to ruling foul play in or out. Why risk that if you are a murderer?
................................
This sentence betrays a total lack of knowledge or understanding of the general mechanisms of terrorism to which the DPI massacre is quite directly linked.
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
Generally speaking, terrorist movements in a country want to show their power and their desire to destabilise the government in place, by carrying out
spectacular actions that should be made known to the widest possible audience (such as more or less targeted murders or assassinations).
The country's governmental authorities seek instead to minimise the importance of their opponents through censorship, withholding of information, disinformation, etc. and a multitude of processes that are of great interest to the country's internal security agents.
The official versions will therefore always prefer the versions of the type: " Move along, there is nothing to see" or : "It is a natural accident, no or a precise (but unconvincing) human intervention in it".
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
In my TOK theory, which I think is sufficiently complete and coherent to merit, I hope, being called conspiratorial, this kind of questioning simply does not exist:
The criminals (sponsors + 3 hired killers) wanted, on the contrary,
to show to the eyes of all, at least as widely as possible, the terrible fate that risks striking those who dare to taunt or neglect the authority of the sponsors who are socially powerful.
The criminals naively thought that :
• 3 visible corpses spread on a bare slope,
• two corpses arranged at the foot of the great cedar,
• plus 4 corpses carefully piled up in the ravine,
could leave no doubt about the reality of a human action (i.e. a surprise attack by a troika of more or less sadistic killers operating without a firearm).
But as Joseph Goebbels, who knew a lot about disinformation, advised in his time: "Don't hesitate: the more implausible the lie, the easier it will be to accept."
In this spirit, the Khrushchev government, which wanted to protect the KGB (on which it relied) from the shame and ridicule of having been incompetent and ineffective by proving incapable of protecting the 9 hikers (who represented, at least for this government, the elite of the Soviet youth), reacted quickly and simply as follows:
After the discovery of the last four bodies on 5 May, the Kremlin ordered Lev Ivanov to close the case quickly.
This is what Lev Ivanov did on 28 May with the well-known formula here:
It is concluded that the cause of their demise was overwhelming force, which the hikers were not able to overcome.This is quite clever because this expression means nothing, while not being false in the strict sense.
Topic: The fault with conspiracy theories (Read 31568 times)
