Ilahiyol,
Just to clarify a couple of points from the forensic and historical side.
The eyes and tongue weren’t ripped out.
The autopsy reports describe post‑mortem soft‑tissue loss caused by:
- water flow in the ravine
- natural decomposition
- small scavengers
- pressure from snow and meltwater
There were no signs of cutting, tearing, or deliberate removal.
The tissue edges were smooth and consistent with natural processes.
On the human side of things, there’s also nothing in the case file that points to a KGB operation. No restricted zone, no classified weapons testing, no military debris, no shrapnel, no burns, no blast damage, no witness statements suppressed. The searchers, rescuers, and investigators all acted openly, and the case was handled like a normal regional investigation of the time.
And in terms of “unknown forces,” the only unusual elements documented by the people actually present were the weather conditions — strong winds, low visibility, drifting snow, and rapidly changing temperatures. Those are the factors that shaped the group’s decisions and the environment they were found in.
Whatever explanation we consider — natural, human, or something else — it still has to match the injuries, the terrain, and the documented behaviour of the group. That’s the only reason I keep returning to those elements.