May 10, 2026, 06:28:40 AM
Dyatlov Pass Forum

Author Topic: Dyatlov Pass-My Theory: The Lighthouse and the Comrades Visceral Sacrifice  (Read 950 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

April 20, 2026, 11:28:32 PM
Read 950 times
Offline

LunarTides93


My Theory: The Lighthouse and the Comrades Visceral Sacrifice
​After hearing the KallMeKris podcast, this is the sequence of events my brain mapped out. This isn't a stated fact, just a theory on how a group of people who cared about each other, and had the experience to navigate the terrain might have handled this disaster.
​The Trigger: Military Fireballs and the Pressure Wave
In 1959, the Soviet military was testing high-altitude devices and projectiles in that area. If one of those "fireballs" (military devices) exploded in mid-air nearby, the resulting pressure wave would have been the "invisible hammer" that hit the slope.
​The First Slab: This pressure wave likely destabilized the snowpack, triggering a small-scale slab avalanche that hit the tent while they were inside.
​The Cover-Up: Because it was a secret military accident that caused civilian deaths, the government would have scrubbed any mention of the testing from the official investigation files.
​The Psychological Trap: Infrasound and the Karman Vortex
The way the wind hits that specific mountain (the Karman Vortex Street) creates infrasound—a low-frequency sound that humans can't hear but that triggers intense primal dread, nausea, and disorientation.
​Induced Panic:
If the hikers were already being affected by this "silent" noise, they were in a state of high-alert panic before the slab even hit. When the explosion happened and the tent collapsed, they felt like they were in a war zone. They sliced their way out and fled into the dark to escape what felt like certain death.
Even in their panicked states they knew that following the Leader in a single line was the ONLY way to possibly survive. They walked in line, when someone veered off their voices led them back to the safety of that single file line.
​Now this what I believe could have happened and why the bodies were found where they were. The three crawling up the mountain with no extra layers from their fallen comrades, the two almost naked at the fire with the burns, and the final four found buried under the snow in the ravine.
​The "Lighthouse" and the Scout Team
Igor Dyatlov led a team of three (Dyatlov, Kolmogorova, and Slobodin) back up the mountain to try and reclaim the tent and gear.
​The Visual Anchor:
They likely left a flashlight turned on and set it on top of the tent to act as a "Lighthouse" to guide them back in the pitch black.
The "Chain of Sound" and the 300-Meter Tether
​One of the most baffling parts of this case is the near-perfect linear spacing of the three scouts found on the slope. When you look at the math, it wasn't a random scramble; it was a Disciplined Communication Chain.
​The 300m "Anchor": Igor (the leader) didn't just collapse 300 meters from the fire. He stopped there to act as the Human Repeater Station. In a blizzard, 300 meters is the physical limit where a human voice can reliably cut through the wind. By staying at this mark, Igor remained "tethered" to the sanctuary of the fire while providing a sonic guide for those ahead.
​The Sound Link: Rustem (the middle) pushed past Igor, using the "staircase" of hand-holds Igor had punched into the ice. He crawled exactly another 300 meters. Why? Because that was the furthest he could go while still hearing Igor's voice behind him. He stayed within the "Sound Chain" to ensure that if he found the tent, he could signal back to the fire.
​The Terminal Sprint: Zina (the scout at the point) was the "Sprinter." She pushed past the sound of Igor and Rustem’s voices, committing to a 200-meter "blind" dash toward the Lighthouse. She wasn't measuring by sound anymore; she was betting her last calories on the light she saw ahead.
​The Mechanical Advantage of the Relay
​This wasn't a race; it was a Relay of Hope.
​Igor used his energy to break the first 300 meters of icy crust with his birch branch.
​Rustem used Igor’s tracks to save energy, allowing him to push another 300 meters.
​Zina, the healthiest (least injured), used the work of both men to launch her final, heroic charge toward the tent.
​They weren't "lost." They were a living chain of command, using their voices to stay connected across 1.5 kilometers of hell until the cold finally snapped the links.
​The Final Struggle:
As the cold took their legs and their bodies failed, they didn't just stop. They dropped to their hands and knees and kept crawling toward that light. They were found in those positions because they refused to give up on their friends at the fire until the second they died.
​The Visceral Sacrifice at the Fire
At the cedar tree, Krivonischenko and Doroshenko were reaching the point of no return. Their friends didn't want to leave them, so to prove they were too far gone, Krivonischenko bit into his own hand.
​The Final "Okay":
By showing he could literally tear his own skin and feel nothing, he gave the final "okay" for the others to take their clothes while they were still alive. He forced them to stop wasting time on a rescue and start focusing on their own survival. They took the layers from their still-living friends as a final, desperate gift of life.
​The Choice to Move and the Second Slab:
The survivors at the fire stayed as long as they could, likely watching that flashlight "lighthouse" until the batteries finally died. Once the scouts hadn't returned and the light was out, they knew they had to find better shelter.
​The Ravine:
The remaining four headed for a ravine to build a snow den to hide from the wind and further military debris.
​The Final Blow:
While they were in that hollow, a second slab of snow (a ceiling collapse of their den) crushed them against the rocks. That weight caused the massive "car-crash" internal injuries—broken ribs and skulls—without leaving any bruises on the outside.
Lyudmila Dubinina: It also provides a grounded explanation as to why her tongue was gone, and there was blood in her stomach. Under that kind of impact she could have suffered from reflexive traumatic amputation—biting her own tongue off as she was crushed beneath the weight of the second slab. Swallowing or even choking on the blood as she passed away.
The Ravine and the Myth of "Surgical" Removal
​To address the "missing eyes and tongue" that often lead people toward ritualistic or paranormal theories: We have to look at the environment where the final four were found. They were submerged in a running creek at the bottom of a ravine for months.
​Maceration and Hydrolysis: When a body is submerged in moving water, especially during a spring thaw, the soft tissue undergoes maceration. The eyes, being primarily water and vitreous humor, are among the first tissues to liquefy and break down.
​The Micro-Environment: Between the physical force of the running water, microorganisms, and small aquatic scavengers, soft tissue is reclaimed by the environment with biological efficiency—not "surgical precision."
​Physics vs. Mystery: At -30°C, fine motor skills vanish. The idea of a human (or any entity) performing clean enucleations without leaving a single nick or "kerf mark" on the orbital bone is physically impossible. It wasn’t a ritual; it was a natural, albeit grisly, post-mortem process in a high-flow environment.
​The Radiation Myth: The higher levels of radiation found on the clothing in the ravine weren't from a "death ray"—they were a result of Environmental Filtration. As the spring thaw turned the slope's runoff into a creek, it carried the radioactive fallout from those military "fireballs" directly into the ravine. The porous layers of clothing (wool/cotton) acted as a natural filter, concentrating the isotopes as the water flowed through the fabric for months.
​The 'missing tongues' Ritual: In order for a tongue removal to be surgical, we would expect to see dislocation or damage to the Mandible (jawbone) to gain the necessary access. Since the jawbones were found perfectly intact, it confirms a biological exit (maceration) rather than a surgical intervention.

​To me it wasn't/ isn't an alien, Yeti, 'they went crazy', or ritualistic situation. It’s a story about a team that never stopped fighting to survive, and a leader who never stopped trying to save his team, even when everything was falling apart.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2026, 03:12:23 PM by LunarTides93 »
 
The following users thanked this post: Ziljoe

April 21, 2026, 03:59:21 AM
Reply #1
Offline

Senior Maldonado


The Radiation Myth: The higher levels of radiation found on the clothing in the ravine weren't from a "death ray"—they were a result of Environmental Filtration. As the spring thaw turned the slope's runoff into a creek, it carried the radioactive fallout from those military "fireballs" directly into the ravine. The porous layers of clothing (wool/cotton) acted as a natural filter, concentrating the isotopes as the water flowed through the fabric for months.
The "death ray" is a fantasy of Lev Ivanov. Neither Soviet military forces nor alliens practiced targeted attacks on hikers with such exotic weapon.

Contamination of water in the creek is very questionable. The most contaminated clothes were on those, who lied the first and the last. If water had been contaminated, we could expect equal clothes contamination or contamination decrease from 1st to the last. Also sample of soil from under the corpses was not radioactive at all.

PS. What were those "military "fireballs"? Any idea?
 

April 21, 2026, 04:17:24 AM
Reply #2
Offline

LunarTides93


The Radiation Myth: The higher levels of radiation found on the clothing in the ravine weren't from a "death ray"—they were a result of Environmental Filtration. As the spring thaw turned the slope's runoff into a creek, it carried the radioactive fallout from those military "fireballs" directly into the ravine. The porous layers of clothing (wool/cotton) acted as a natural filter, concentrating the isotopes as the water flowed through the fabric for months.
The "death ray" is a fantasy of Lev Ivanov. Neither Soviet military forces nor alliens practiced targeted attacks on hikers with such exotic weapon.

Contamination of water in the creek is very questionable. The most contaminated clothes were on those, who lied the first and the last. If water had been contaminated, we could expect equal clothes contamination or contamination decrease from 1st to the last. Also sample of soil from under the corpses was not radioactive at all.

PS. What were those "military "fireballs"? Any idea?

Thanks for the engagement, Senior Maldonado! To address your points:
​The Soil vs. The Clothing: The lack of radioactivity in the soil actually supports the Environmental Filtration theory. Radioactive isotopes in water runoff are often particulate; they tend to adhere to porous, organic fibers like wool and cotton rather than non-organic soil. The clothing acted as a biological filter (a 'sieve'), concentrating the isotopes as the spring thaw runoff flowed through the ravine for months.
​Variable Contamination (The 'First and Last' Sequence): Regarding who lay first or last in the creek: a mountain ravine during a spring thaw is not a linear pipe; it is a high-turbulence environment. The water doesn't filter through one person to get to the next; it swirls around all of them. The variation in radiation levels is more likely due to Fabric Surface Area—thick wool sweaters will trap significantly more particulate isotopes than smoother layers, regardless of their position in the 'line.' OR There is the alternative possibility that the 'bookend' hikers likely acted as physical sediment traps. The upstream individual functioned as a primary sieve for the fresh runoff, while the downstream individual sat in the 'collection' area where the flow slowed down. The middle two hikers likely experienced higher-velocity, turbulent water being forced around the obstacles, which reduced the 'dwell time' for radioactive particulates to adhere to their clothing.
​The Fireballs: These were most likely high-altitude tests of R-7 ICBMs or similar projectiles launched from Baikonur. The 'spheres' are a well-documented phenomenon caused by the combustion of rocket fuel/oxidizers in the upper atmosphere. The 'invisible hammer' isn't a fantasy weapon—it’s a standard supersonic pressure wave from a high-altitude explosion or failure.
I really hope this helps to clear up your questions regarding the Radiation Myth, and Fireballs part of my theory and thanks again for reading and even more for asking questions!
​Ultimately, as I mentioned at the start, this is just my personal theory. I’m simply looking at the evidence through the lens of my own clinical experience and the physical reality of how the human body reacts to extreme environments. We may never have 'official' answers, but to me, the science of anatomy and the environment tells a much more powerful story of human loyalty, and the pure determination to survive than any ghost story ever could.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2026, 04:39:01 AM by LunarTides93 »
 

April 21, 2026, 04:39:09 AM
Reply #3
Offline

Senior Maldonado


@LunarTides93,

I like your theory and share most of your conclusions regarding the events on 1079. If I have understood right, you consider high-altitude nuclear explosion of R-7's warhead. In this case I wounder if you also consider vast terrain contamination. How was radioactive dust delivered to the 1079 slope? Any why was it beta only?
 

April 21, 2026, 05:07:57 AM
Reply #4
Offline

LunarTides93


@LunarTides93,

I like your theory and share most of your conclusions regarding the events on 1079. If I have understood right, you consider high-altitude nuclear explosion of R-7's warhead. In this case I wounder if you also consider vast terrain contamination. How was radioactive dust delivered to the 1079 slope? Any why was it beta only?

Hey Senior, those are great technical questions. To address the R-7/Beta specifics:
​Why Beta only? Beta radiation is notoriously 'sticky' but has low penetration. In an R-7 context (or any fuel-based atmospheric event), you're often looking at isotopes that emit Beta particles which settle as dust. Unlike Gamma, which passes through almost everything, Beta particles are easily captured by organic filters—like the heavy wool fibers of the hikers' clothes. My theory is that the water acted as the transport, but the wool acted as the concentrator. The lack of Gamma just confirms this wasn't a direct 'blast' exposure, but a secondary 'collection' event.
​The Delivery: I'm not ruling out a high-altitude fuel dump or a pressure wave carrying localized fallout. However, my 'Lighthouse' theory argues that the topography did the heavy lifting. Whether the dust came from a missile or a localized atmospheric anomaly, it would have settled on the snow. When that snow melted or shifted into the ravine, the water became a concentrated 'slurry' of those particles.
​The Filtration Reality: Because the hikers in the ravine were effectively 'bookended' by rocks in a turbulent stream, their clothes spent weeks 'sieving' that water. It explains why the radiation was found in the fibers of the clothes (Beta capture) and not in the surrounding inorganic soil.
​Essentially, I think we're both right—the R-7 might have provided the 'dust,' but to me the environmental turbulence provided the 'concentration' on the bodies.
 

April 21, 2026, 08:43:21 PM
Reply #5
Offline

GlennM


Lunar Tide welcome to the forum. It's good to have our Canadian friends participate. I appreciate your thoughtful analysis of the event. Be aware that most theories wind up being more or less selective in what the author emphasizes in his/her theory. This selectivity is why so far, no theory has become universally accepted. Only 10 actually know what actually happened out there, nine hikers and God. We all want to be the eleventh  thumb1
We don't have to say everything that comes into our head.
 

April 22, 2026, 01:23:07 AM
Reply #6
Offline

LunarTides93


Lunar Tide welcome to the forum. It's good to have our Canadian friends participate. I appreciate your thoughtful analysis of the event. Be aware that most theories wind up being more or less selective in what the author emphasizes in his/her theory. This selectivity is why so far, no theory has become universally accepted. Only 10 actually know what actually happened out there, nine hikers and God. We all want to be the eleventh  thumb1

I appreciate the welcome, GlennM! I completely agree that the truth of what happened out there is something we can only speculate about.
 grin1
I’m honestly just here to offer a different point of view—one derived from their humanity and their autonomy. Recognizing them as the experienced adventurers they were.
 

April 22, 2026, 07:04:09 AM
Reply #7
Offline

GlennM


LT, I appreciate your enthusiasm and POV. If something in it moves the needle towards truth, that is all to the good. The flip side is that if it does not, then it becomes noise that yojr readers have to filter. Some members have rather loud filters.

Welcome to the forum.
We don't have to say everything that comes into our head.
 

April 29, 2026, 03:41:04 PM
Reply #8
Offline

sarapuk

Case-Files Achievement Recipient
Lunar Tide welcome to the forum. It's good to have our Canadian friends participate. I appreciate your thoughtful analysis of the event. Be aware that most theories wind up being more or less selective in what the author emphasizes in his/her theory. This selectivity is why so far, no theory has become universally accepted. Only 10 actually know what actually happened out there, nine hikers and God. We all want to be the eleventh  thumb1

Nicely put. 😊. We could add an 11th factor. The unknown force responible for the Dyatlov Group demise.
DB
 

April 29, 2026, 04:33:34 PM
Reply #9
Offline

GlennM


They call it an unknown compelling force because wind and blown snow do not leave calling cards. They are transient by nature.

 Wouldn't we all be served if a better translation of Russian changed "Unknown compelling force" to "unwitnessed compelling force". So much drama in the forum hinges on the single word "unknown". Unknown does not imply unknowable, only unwitnessed (by a survivor). On the other hand it is a well known truism in criminal investigations that the murderer always brings something to the scene of a crime and always takes something away. In the DPI, none of this exists! There was no murder and no conspiracy. This includes LGM too. No means, motive, nor opportunity has ever been validated, only speculated.

To refine the case files with Unwitnessed, unverified, undocumented...anything is better than unknown.Unknown is a lazy assessment, simple, direct, non committal and vanilla safe for people on the government payroll. Don't believe it? How quickly was the incident filed and forgotten?

« Last Edit: April 29, 2026, 06:18:08 PM by GlennM »
We don't have to say everything that comes into our head.
 

April 30, 2026, 01:03:17 AM
Reply #10
Offline

SURI


The murderers could not take anything from the crime scene, they ran out of time.
 

April 30, 2026, 01:28:52 AM
Reply #11
Offline

Senior Maldonado


They call it an unknown compelling force because wind and blown snow do not leave calling cards. They are transient by nature.
Wouldn't we all be served if a better translation of Russian changed "Unknown compelling force" to "unwitnessed compelling force".
Both the above translations of what Ivanov put into the Case closing statement are not correct. What we have in the document is "стихийная сила, преодолеть которую туристы были не в состоянии", which translates:
an elemental force, which the hikers were not able to cope with

 

April 30, 2026, 04:54:11 AM
Reply #12
Offline

Ziljoe


They call it an unknown compelling force because wind and blown snow do not leave calling cards. They are transient by nature.
Wouldn't we all be served if a better translation of Russian changed "Unknown compelling force" to "unwitnessed compelling force".
Both the above translations of what Ivanov put into the Case closing statement are not correct. What we have in the document is "стихийная сила, преодолеть которую туристы были не в состоянии", which translates:
an elemental force, which the hikers were not able to cope with



Senior, the phrase Ivanov used is very specific: 
‘стихийная сила, преодолеть которую туристы были не в состоянии.’ 
This is not a poetic expression — it is a fixed legal term in Soviet forensic language.

‘Стихийная сила’ means a natural, environmental force — weather, avalanche, wind, cold, storm — an act of nature. 
It does not and cannot refer to a rocket, missile, explosion, or any technological cause. 
Those fall under completely different terminology in Soviet case files.

So the conclusion in the closing statement is not ambiguous: 
the cause was a natural force they could not overcome, but the investigators could not determine which specific natural force. 
In English, ‘unknown’ often gets interpreted as mysterious or supernatural, but in this context it simply means unidentified within the category of natural causes, not ‘mysterious’ or ‘technological.’”

I believe the legal meaning is even stricter
In Soviet forensic language, стихийная сила is a legal category meaning:

“death caused by natural environmental conditions.”

That's it , the conclusion was is it was the weather conditions.
 

April 30, 2026, 05:41:01 AM
Reply #13
Offline

Senior Maldonado


Senior, the phrase Ivanov used is very specific: 
‘стихийная сила, преодолеть которую туристы были не в состоянии.’ 
This is not a poetic expression — it is a fixed legal term in Soviet forensic language.
‘Стихийная сила’ means a natural, environmental force — weather, avalanche, wind, cold, storm — an act of nature. 
It does not and cannot refer to a rocket, missile, explosion, or any technological cause. 
I am with you concerning these comments.

Actually, Ivanov says that the hikers died because of  environmental force. However, he does not name that force, which leaves his conclusion vague and gives space for speculations. Saying that 'something natural' killed the hikers is not enough to announce that the case has been investigated and can be closed. When it turned out that the last 4 hikers had severe injuries, Ivanov should have continued investigation. But he stopped it instead. And we know why. The CPSU regional leaders ordered him to do that.

Regarding environmental force -
Ivanov did not only name it, he also did not explain how that force had affected the hikers. While an explaniation is very important. Let's consider an example of another case, where Nature is involved. A man drinks a bottle of vodka in a pub, and on his way home he feels bad and falls unconscious on the road. This happens in winter, and the man dies from hypothermia. What would you put as a cause of death in the closing statement? Was that frost or the bottle of vodka? Probabaly, frost would be the right answer, but ignoring the trigger (bottle of vodka) is not right. And I feel that for DPI you prefer to ignore a trigger, which kicked the hikers half-naked out of their tent to frosty wilderness, while it needs to be understood.
 
The following users thanked this post: Ziljoe

April 30, 2026, 06:18:21 AM
Reply #14
Offline

Ziljoe


Senior, the vodka example doesn’t really reflect how causes are classified in forensic work. 
Background circumstances can be infinite — if he hadn’t drunk vodka he might have left earlier, taken a different route, or been hit by a bus. 
The cause of death is the mechanism that actually produced the fatal outcome, not every hypothetical condition that preceded it.

That’s the same principle Ivanov applied. 
When he wrote ‘стихийная сила, преодолеть которую туристы были не в состоянии’, he wasn’t being vague — he was placing the cause firmly within the established forensic category of a natural environmental mechanism. 
In Soviet practice, that category is specific: wind, snow load, cold, avalanche conditions, etc. 
It’s the formal classification used when the mechanism is natural but the exact subtype can’t be reconstructed.

And the investigation didn’t arrive at that category by guesswork. 
It was reached by process of elimination: they checked for rocket activity, questioned the Mansi, looked for animal involvement, confirmed no escaped convicts, found no signs of violence or human interference, and ruled out criminal causes. 
Once those possibilities were excluded, the remaining classification was a natural environmental force — even if the precise mechanism couldn’t be determined from the scene.

So the wording isn’t a placeholder for a missing ‘trigger’. 
It’s the standard phrasing used when the category of cause is established but the exact natural mechanism can’t be identified with certainty.
 

April 30, 2026, 06:24:01 AM
Reply #15
Offline

GlennM


The murderers could not take anything from the crime scene, they ran out of time.
Not take, but rather bring to and leave behind . True and unavoidable. No perfect crime.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2026, 04:31:00 PM by GlennM »
We don't have to say everything that comes into our head.
 

April 30, 2026, 10:27:59 AM
Reply #16
Offline

SURI


The murderers could not take anything from the crime scene, they ran out of time.
Not take, but rather bring to and leave behind . True and unavoidable. No perfect crimee.

The murderers left behind many traces that are not visible at first glance, but cannot be missed by a keen eye (Ivanov, Grigoriev, Yarovoy). And most importantly, the murderers left behind corpses. Where, how and how many, you can learn from a deeper investigation of DPI. Blind faith in official results will not lead you to the truth. Not everything could be published back then, and I think it's not possible today either.
 

April 30, 2026, 09:38:49 PM
Reply #17
Offline

GlennM


Too many holes in the theory, not enough holes in the deceased.
We don't have to say everything that comes into our head.
 

May 01, 2026, 05:05:12 AM
Reply #18
Offline

SURI


Too many holes in the theory, not enough holes in the deceased.

The holes are in your ignorance. The AI ​​has led you astray.
 

May 01, 2026, 12:51:35 PM
Reply #19
Offline

GlennM


Good manners and actual facts are always fashionable. I recommend it.
We don't have to say everything that comes into our head.
 

May 01, 2026, 03:39:59 PM
Reply #20
Online

amashilu

Global Moderator
Good manners and actual facts are always fashionable. I recommend it.

I'm not sure you are one to recommend good manners after posting this:
Too many holes in the theory, not enough holes in the deceased
 

May 01, 2026, 10:57:30 PM
Reply #21
Offline

SURI


Good manners and actual facts are always fashionable. I recommend it.

All the facts have not been revealed to us. If you knew them, the diaries would make your head spin. The DPI is so shocking (shocking to the public, not to the investigators) that the real truth can never be revealed.
 

May 02, 2026, 03:18:41 AM
Reply #22
Offline

Ziljoe


Good manners and actual facts are always fashionable. I recommend it.

All the facts have not been revealed to us. If you knew them, the diaries would make your head spin. The DPI is so shocking (shocking to the public, not to the investigators) that the real truth can never be revealed.

Whether someone uses archives or textbooks doesn’t change whether a claim is supported by evidence. If something is wrong, it should be possible to show where. We have numerous resources at our disposal and we have to use them.

Second guessing doesn't help only facts do. I can't imagine anything being so shocking that it can't be revealed. The ex soviet archive's are littered with murders and sad but horrific accidents.

« Last Edit: May 02, 2026, 03:23:46 AM by Ziljoe »
 

May 02, 2026, 07:55:22 AM
Reply #23
Offline

SURI


AI only sees what is on the surface. It cannot understand the thoughts and depth of the text unless the text is written in direct language. It leads astray.

The key element in the case is the diaries. If you understand the diaries, then you understand everything else. At first glance they say nothing, but at second glance they say everything. Maybe the group diary is not so group, maybe the last entry was not made by Dyatlov... AI won't tell you that.
 

May 02, 2026, 09:32:31 AM
Reply #24
Offline

SURI


●  Hint

Group diary? Yes and no.


Diaries should be understood in this sense:

There is slogan for ​​our trek, "In a country of mysterious signs".

–  Возникает идея нашего похода "В стране таинственных знаков".
 

May 02, 2026, 03:47:14 PM
Reply #25
Offline

Ziljoe


●  Hint

Group diary? Yes and no.


Diaries should be understood in this sense:

There is slogan for ​​our trek, "In a country of mysterious signs".

–  Возникает идея нашего похода "В стране таинственных знаков".


The signs being the carved markings on the trees by the Mansi?
 

May 02, 2026, 11:10:56 PM
Reply #26
Offline

SURI


The three copies of the diaries – the Group Diary, the Unknown Diary and the Evening Otorten – are linked and have the same authors. Only when you find them can you unravel what happened.

There is one surprise after another in DPI. Nothing is as it seems at first glance. Their mysterious signs are their diaries. A group within a group.
 

May 03, 2026, 12:50:19 AM
Reply #27
Offline

SURI


And with this in mind, then read Grigoriev's notebook. And while reading, don't forget that everything is directed towards the DPI. It's not so much about the search itself, it's a picture of the incident.
 

May 03, 2026, 11:00:58 AM
Reply #28
Offline

SURI


If I take the total number of that group

4 dead in the mountains
3 alive in the city
« Last Edit: May 03, 2026, 11:49:05 AM by SURI »
 

May 03, 2026, 06:55:26 PM
Reply #29
Offline

Ziljoe


I'm not following yet. There's no point in explaining it in drips and drabs . It's a frustrating read Suri.

If anyone had the aha moment, they would just say it and give evidence and theory.

Please commit with your observation.