They plotted, using the method you suggest, only one coordinate...
======================
One:
https://disk.yandex.ru/a/ulbky3rh3V9woF/5ae9691cedce975f9c7014e2
Two:
https://disk.yandex.ru/a/ulbky3rh3V9woF/5ae9691cedce975f9c7014e1
Don't make me and everyone else laugh. This "second coordinate" is so blurry that I would be ashamed to talk about it at all. Don't kid yourself and the rest of the public.
The finds confirm that the tent was located right here and nowhere else:
https://forum.dyatlovpass.com/index.php?topic=864.msg14471#msg14471
They do not confirm anything. The tent could have been at any distance from that location. as it was being moved from where it was to where the helipad was. It could have just fallen out along the trajectory of the movement. In addition, we still have to prove that these items are the property of the Dyatlov group, and did not appear there already afterwards. So far it was just announced that it was from the Dyatlov group and nothing else was presented. The participants in the search answered the question of whether these items were the property of the Dyatlov group in the negative. More precisely, they did not deny, but also did not confirm such a possibility.
Chuckcha ne chitatel:
http://1723.ru/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=5133&view=findpost&p=63482
You have a well-developed sense of self-criticism and a desire to pass off what you want as what it really is. And not something else.
When we were determining the location of the tent...
=====================
This is your tent location:
http://1723.ru/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=5133&view=findpost&p=92733
http://1723.ru/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=5133&view=findpost&p=92778
Your mountains have moved.
When will you stop passing off Koshkin's fantasies as true events? His twisted thoughts and words have already been demonstrated by his own "exact measurements. For the rest, I could have said even more clearly:
1. These are not my points, but the fact that Koshkin with his level of "qualification" "assigned" them there. If he cannot translate the coordinates from degrees, minutes and seconds and tenths and hundredths of a degree on his own, it already says exactly how "competent" he is in such definitions.
2. he fraudulently obtained my rough (field) records of 2008 (having deceived Timur that it was necessary for another purpose) and began demonstrate his unintelligent notions. Draft records and were meant for more detailed research, not for other people's and empty fantasies.
3. neither you nor he were present at the place and time it was done, so you can't honestly say what was there. And yours and his perceptions are perverse.
4.Besides purely abstract and measurable components, it is necessary to take into account how the participants of this trip did it, and you and he generally ignore this as a component. Koshkin "assigned" supposedly "my places" to such points, which they could not dream even in a terrible dream. This is because his practice of such travel is not even zero, but negative. His fantasies are very different from reality. It's much easier for me here, I've had to camp this way many dozens of times (more than 100). No one is going to create a lot of extra work for themselves, much less "bury" it deep. It makes no sense even because of snow drifts It is enough only to level the site. Therefore it is not necessary to consider Dyatlov's group for idiots who think up for themselves a lot of superfluous difficulties. That is the difference between my tent positions and what Koshkin cracks about for a long time. All of this we have already demonstrated many times in photos and videos. But, apparently, it never "got" to you. Как шифровка до Штирлица.
5.The most competent theoretical construction was made by a person under a pseudonym harlan. He has everything approximately converges at least because he accurately determined the direction of the axis of the tent on the slope = 12 degrees from the north-south direction. This is completely (+/- 1 degree) consistent with what it actually is, because the tangent to the formative curvature of the site in that area has exactly that direction. Where it is positioned by Koshkin according to your methodology, there are noticeable differences in that direction.
6.If you impose these coordinates in the edition of Koshkin on google-model surface, then there coordinates of height will not come together, somewhere at 10 meters (30 ft)-in height! -, and somewhere by 15 or more. This means that his coordinates were put completely thoughtlessly and unqualified.
7.When determining the location, I used not one pair of reference points, but several, and then I optimized it all. If you, in your method, also take different pairs of guides, you will get different position points with a large variation. If you didn't take that into account or didn't know, that's an indication of your skill level.
8.The question of accuracy is artificially created to give you more of your own importance. It has no practical value whatsoever. Because +/- 100 meter (330 ft) shift in the north-south direction, 10 meters to the east, and 20 meters to the west, will make absolutely no difference in analyzing the behavior of the group in that location, even in the minutiae. Everything is the same there. If you do not understand it, because you have not been on site and did not explore it practically, then do not hide behind what would juggle with abstract numbers. Chasing imaginary accuracy is reminiscent of wanting the Schnobel Prize (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ig_Nobel_Prize). It is a prize for scientific and futile achievements. Apply for it, then you will definitely get it.
9.In winter conditions in 2014 Shura put on GPS coordinates all known points, which were determined theoretically. They hit the area with a spread of ~10 m (33 ft). My refinement (in real winter conditions, taking into account all natural variations and corrections) gave a difference of 8 m (24 ft) on the laser rangefinder, almost exactly north. With that difference, what is there to talk about if the technical accuracy of the plotting is possible within ~ +/- 20 m (66 ft)?
10.To talk about priority, we should have come to this place before 2008, when nothing was known about this place and it was theoretically located with an accuracy of +/- 300 ... 500 m. And not to come to the ready-made, which has already been clarified several times. Including in 2013, when Shura and Timur worked there. And Koshkin himself was present. After that attempts exalt oneself at the expense of "clarification" "by 2...3 mm (0.1 in)":) look ridiculous or as slyness.
**************************************
The answers to all the questions related to the death of Dyatlov group:
http://1723.ru/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=5133&view=findpost&p=107299
"The answer to all questions" is bluff. It is impossible answer to "all questions" correctly. More than half of your "answers" resemble nonsense, which can easily be determined by direct practice in the field under similar conditions. If you don't take that into account, you can narcissize yourself ad infinitum.
Topic: The tent location (Read 14919 times)
