November 23, 2024, 03:28:36 PM
Dyatlov Pass Forum

Author Topic: Thinking out Loud  (Read 30192 times)

0 Members and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.

December 29, 2020, 06:01:45 PM
Read 30192 times

DAXXY

Guest



Note: American Army Manual 'snowcaves' 1986
The entrance should be built so that it is about 45 degrees
from the downwind side. A small tunnel is burrowed directly into the side of the
snowdrift for 1 meter. A chamber is excavated from this tunnel. Excavation is done to the
right and left, so that the length of the chamber is at right angles to the tunnel entrance.
Personnel doing the digging will become wet from perspiration and from the snow inside
the cave. They should wear the minimum amount of clothing to ensure that they have a
change of dry clothing when finished.


'You are likely to become drenched with snow and sweat.  Do your best to stay dry.  To wet out (saturate) the least amount of your clothing's insulation quality, work in your base layers and gortex layers.  Stay out of the wind'.
http://www.traditionalmountaineering.org/FAQ_Snowcaves.htm

Why did they leave barefoot? - I ask the last question that concerns me.
I can explain. Down there is a steep slope, which is crazy to descend in total darkness in slippery ski boots.
https://dyatlovpass.com/they-died-with-dignity

The Buryatia  Incident August 1993
https://dyatlovpass.com/hamar-daban
A group of tourists from Kazakhstan, led by professional climber Lyudmila Korovina. Once they made it to Buryatia, the group set out on a journey across the Chamar-Daban mountain range on 2 August. The weather wasn’t on their side: it was pouring down cold rain and snow. Nevertheless, the group continued on their route relatively safely until 5 August.

Six out of seven in their group did not survive.
The only survivor, Valentina Utochenko, 17, later wrote in a statement how, during the difficult descent, carried out in near zero visibility, one of the members of the group was struck down hard, foaming at the mouth and bleeding from the ears. The rest of the group shortly developed the same symptoms.

(Yuri Doroshenko autopsy....right cheek soft tissue covered with gray foam; gray liquid coming form his open mouth. Most apparent cause is pulmonary edema).

The six members who died had done so almost simultaneously, after rolling around on the ground, tearing their clothes off and clutching their throats. The young woman was left alone. Nearly unconscious, she navigated the power lines until she reached the river at the bottom, where she was rescued by a group of kayaking tourists.


Chivruay 1973

https://dyatlovpass.com/chivruay-incident-2?lid=1

'The same day I flew to Irkutsk with the rescue team of our university's mountaineering club and spent more than a week completing the search that was launched when he disappeared in 1972. I can draw similarities between this episode and the search for Dyatlov group. The body was very badly and quickly destroyed by water after thawing. During the whole winter, the body was frozen in ice near the bank of the Kitoy River, near the Fedyushkina River, 13 km (8 mi) down from where it had disappeared.'
'We arrived 5 or 6 days later and found that parts of body tissues washed with water were almost completely destroyed to the bone'
'This was an illustration of the damage water can do in less than a week'.

'It is necessary to note an important observation, very often referred to in the Dyatlov case, the red or orange color of the bodies. The discoloration is attributed to anything but natural causes (see #Orange). In fact, the recently extracted frozen body does have a reddish color, more accurately red-orange. It's a common occurrence in deaths due to cold. The precise medical definition can be found in the Handbook of Forensic Medicine, it’s called frosty erythema or Keferstein stains.'

'All members of the group who left the tent were adequately dressed but the weather was extreme. Survival under such conditions is a big challenge in general. Everyone had a full set of hiking clothes and extra sweaters. Some had double and triple wool sweaters. Lidiya Martina, Valentin Zemlyanov and Artyom Lekant were wearing insulated jackets. Ilya Altshuler was additionally wearing a warm aviation winter jacket but he didn't wear gloves. Judging by all indications, he died of total exhaustion and lost muscles tone. It is enough to stop only for a few minutes and an irreversible cooling process would begin'.

https://dyatlovpass.com/chivruay-incident-2?lid=1

'When snow has accumulated over time on a long steep slope the maximum pressure from all the snow is focused at the bottom of the slope.  Digging a shelter (a cavity) in to the base of a deep slope of snow does not improve the insulation aspect of the shelter, but does hugely increase the risk of the slope sliding and the den collapsing'.

'- do not dream that after stopping the snow mass you will "dig tunnels", "live for hours under the snow" - these are isolated cases in the history of mankind and they are related to the descent of a mass of dry snow, while wet snow freezes in a matter of seconds after stopping - this is LIQUID CONCRETE - and the limbs are motionless and such snow does not allow oxygen to pass through!'

Wet snow is a gigantic load of 800 kg / m3. When the avalanche stops in its cone, the temperature rises due to the high pressure of the snow masses. The resulting melt water fills the gaps between the melted snow particles and soon freezes. The resulting "snow cement" does not lend itself to shoveling and is broken with difficulty by an ice ax.'

'Sometimes people die in an avalanche when there is only half a meter or a meter of snow above them. It seems strange, because we are used to the fact that snow is weightless. But the apparent lightness of the snow is deceiving. To get out from a depth of one meter, a person needs to overcome a weight of 150 to 300 kilograms, depending on how high the moisture content of the snow is'.

'We dug it out (to Dubinin), cutting out snow blocks two shovel wide and one shovel long (shovel bayonet) and somehow threw it out of the excavation by hand. Therefore, I believe that the entire layer of snow was a monstrous mass'.

In the ravine Zolotarev and Kolevatov are covered with one jacket.
Then it is understandable why, after the removal of the bodies, the left sleeve of Thibault's jacket turned out to be empty:
and Zolotarev's wide "sleeve" disappeared from his left hand:

Hypothermia
Exertion leading to physical exhaustion is normally a factor in the more serious cases of hypothermia as it eventually leads to a decrease in heat generation either through lack of energy and/or lack of activity.   

The level of your energy reserves is vital in fending off hypothermia.  In moderately cold conditions where your body is subject to cooling over a long period, while your energy reserves remain intact, your body can work at a rate that generates enough heat to offset heat loss.  Once your energy reserves are exhausted (what athletes would call “hitting the wall”), you can’t maintain your rate of work and heat supply falls.  Thus, once your energy reserves are exhausted your core temperature begins to fall and you succumb to hypothermia.  Even if you are then removed from the cold, your body finds it very difficult to generate the warmth necessary to re-warm spontaneously because your energy reserves are exhausted.  Indeed you may continue to cool.  These circumstances are sometimes referred to as ‘sub-acute hypothermia’ or ‘exhaustion hypothermia’.   

Sub-acute or exhaustion hypothermia most commonly occurs amongst hill-walkers and climbers being exposed to moderate cold combined with windy and wet conditions.  This type of weather is common in the British hills.  Competitors in endurance activities and events such as mountain marathons are at risk all year-round, not just in winter.   

There is a seeming paradox that is critical to be aware of.  Compare the above scenario to a situation where you are exposed to more severe cold and subject to rapid cooling – such as falling into cold water – while your energy reserves are still intact.  Once removed from the cold, your body will utilise its energy reserves to re-warm quickly.   

Insufficient food decreases the fuel available for heat generation and in the short-term is closely linked to exhaustion (see above).   

Do not apply external warmth such as sitting the casualty close to a fire or a stove.  Again, this opens blood vessels on the surface, drawing blood from the core.  Active external warming from a fire can be lethal.     

Even if you get the casualty into a warm environment such as a cabin, keep them wrapped up.  Otherwise warm air on the skin can cause the casualty to vasodilate.  Again this can cause cold blood to be shunted to the core as well as a catastrophic drop in blood pressure.  The mortality rate for hypothermic casualities, particularly severely hypothermic casualties, introduced to warm environments is high.     

The colder the casualty, the more gently they must be handled.  The heart becomes much more sensitive to physical shocks and it is possible to easily send a severely hypothermic casualty into cardiac arrest.   
http://paulkirtley.co.uk/2010/hypothermia/

If you are lost in the snow and your clothes are wet, should you take your clothes off?

It depends. If the temperatures are above freezing, (32ºF/0ºC), then taking your clothes off when they are wet MIGHT be a good or okay idea/strategy for avoiding hypothermia.

This would only be helpful if you could build a fire and then take your clothes off, and dry them out by a fire or something. Then you could put them back on and stay warm.
If, on the other hand, the temperatures were WAY BELOW freezing, then you would want to keep them on, but with one distinct change: You will want to get that wet clothing away from your skin, so you will need to stuff the inside of your clothes with crumpled paper, with dried grasses, with dead leaves, or cattail down, or even bubble wrap, to give you some insulation. It will allow your body heat to start to dry out the wet clothes, and still give you protection from the wind, the cold, the snow, or the surrounding wilderness environment.

Other Factors: What kind of clothes are you wearing that is wet? If you’re wearing jeans, a cotton sweatshirt and cotton t-shirt, then yes, that’s a huge, huge problem.

If you’re wearing polar fleece or wool pants or sweaters or long underwear, or other ‘wicking’ synthetic clothing, you can keep wearing them, because those clothes will keep you warm, even when wet. However, I would take them off, wring them out, squeeze out as much water as I can, and then put it back on as quick as you can so they don’t get too cold and chill you out! That’s a ‘fresh’ feeling, putting wet clothes back on, in the winter!
https://www.quora.com/profile/Ricardo-Sierra-6

Semyon Zolotaryov Had a rolled up newspaper in his back trouser pocket.
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-349-351?rbid=17743
Does this tell us that by the time Semyon is in the shelter he is still not in a desperate hypothermic state because the newspaper is still in his pocket. Also he hasn't offered it to any other casualty so maybe some in this group only need cloth wrappings to protect their feet and hands from snow contact.  They aren't yet needing to pack their clothes with newspaper.  Then their shelter collapsed.

A safer Shelter
Snow dens are better for above the tree line and take time and skill to build, and make the builders wet from snow and sweat.  A snow trench shelter is better and safer in many situations in forest.  When digging any shelter having it 'cave in' or 'collapse' is a real and dangerous risk.  Depth and snow type should be taken in to account.  For a snow trench 1 meter depth in snow with a good foliage floor and foliage roof with snow on top should be enough to protect a person in snow.  Snow is 90% air and a great insulator but it depends how wet and slushy it is. The supreme quality of insulation (be it in a sleeping bag, down jacket, wool blanket, etc.) is the dead air space.  And snow is full of it!  Snow makes a fantastic insulator – as long as you can keep it from melting (for example, from your body heat).

« Last Edit: January 25, 2021, 06:21:00 PM by DAXXY »
 

December 30, 2020, 02:16:56 PM
Reply #1
Offline

sarapuk

Case-Files Achievement Recipient
Daxxy. So a lot to grasp here. But the gist of the argument is that you believe that it was an exercise that went wrong and led to the sequence of Events. When it comes to safety then safety is an important component of any expedition even ones that are supposed to do tasks during an expedition. In other words 'Safety Comes First'. The weather conditions were very bad and so its highly unlikely that they would do anything that risked their lives. And if you look at the known sequence of Events then nothing stands out that suggests that they were participating in some kind of tasks.
DB
 

December 30, 2020, 03:05:08 PM
Reply #2

DAXXY

Guest
No you're right but absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.  I am just looking at ideas and trying to see why a group leaves a tent without proper clothing and tools to go to a wood and light a fire.  This case has a lot of perceptions in that may not necessarily be accurate.  Like 'they cut themselves out of the tent in a panic' but then walked off in their socks all together to some other place, leaving their coats and tools and valuables behind in the tent, when they knew their food store and escape route (along the river) was in another direction.  It's fascinating. Yes safety should come first.  But mistakes happen, human nature gets in the way sometimes, like why did they head up to the pass to put the tent up on an exposed pass instead of camping by the food store that night ? which would be safer.

I'm also trying to not immediately include any scenarios or outsiders other than the group and plausible scenarios. I don't want to get in to the realm of yeti's and aliens...

They also seem to have walked down in to a huge basin in the surrounding landscape.  (The cedar tree is approx center of this basin) Where all the surrounding denser freezing air would sink to. 

 





'NOTE: The colder air which flows down the valley walls may “collect” at the bottom of the valley, creating a cold pool of air near the surface and low temperatures on the ground. La Brevine in Switzerland is noted as having recorded the lowest temperature in Swiss Meteorological record, -41.8 oC, mainly due to its situation in a valley surrounded by the Jura “mountains”, in which cold air pools near the valley floor due to the Katabatic effect. Aircraft approaching an airport in similar geographic and climatological locations may experience an increase in performance while flying into the cold pool, whereas, more safety-important, an aircraft climbing through the cold pool may experience a significant inversion layer once out of the pool, possibly affecting performance significantly.'

https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Katabatic_Wind




« Last Edit: January 01, 2021, 11:17:55 AM by DAXXY »
 

January 02, 2021, 10:59:42 AM
Reply #3
Offline

sarapuk

Case-Files Achievement Recipient
No you're right but absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.  I am just looking at ideas and trying to see why a group leaves a tent without proper clothing and tools to go to a wood and light a fire.  This case has a lot of perceptions in that may not necessarily be accurate.  Like 'they cut themselves out of the tent in a panic' but then walked off in their socks all together to some other place, leaving their coats and tools and valuables behind in the tent, when they knew their food store and escape route (along the river) was in another direction.  It's fascinating. Yes safety should come first.  But mistakes happen, human nature gets in the way sometimes, like why did they head up to the pass to put the tent up on an exposed pass instead of camping by the food store that night ? which would be safer.

I'm also trying to not immediately include any scenarios or outsiders other than the group and plausible scenarios. I don't want to get in to the realm of yeti's and aliens...

They also seem to have walked down in to a huge basin in the surrounding landscape.  (The cedar tree is approx center of this basin) Where all the surrounding denser freezing air would sink to. 

 





'NOTE: The colder air which flows down the valley walls may “collect” at the bottom of the valley, creating a cold pool of air near the surface and low temperatures on the ground. La Brevine in Switzerland is noted as having recorded the lowest temperature in Swiss Meteorological record, -41.8 oC, mainly due to its situation in a valley surrounded by the Jura “mountains”, in which cold air pools near the valley floor due to the Katabatic effect. Aircraft approaching an airport in similar geographic and climatological locations may experience an increase in performance while flying into the cold pool, whereas, more safety-important, an aircraft climbing through the cold pool may experience a significant inversion layer once out of the pool, possibly affecting performance significantly.'

https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Katabatic_Wind





Yeah we are all trying to figure out why they pitched the Tent where they did and then abandon it in the way that they did. I dont see a big basin though where the Cedar Tree is ! ?  It could be said that there are several areas where cold spots could gather. So if the weather was as bad as everyone believes it was then pitching a Tent on the side of an exposed Mountainside was a very bad idea, unless they had a very good reason to do so. They may have been scared of something on the Trail up the Valley.
DB
 

January 02, 2021, 02:10:34 PM
Reply #4

DAXXY

Guest
There is no mention of fear of any person or animal in any diary.  Dyatlov may have wanted to try his stove out.  https://forum.dyatlovpass.com/index.php?topic=691.msg10392#msg10392

And the two Yuris went to the wood lower down for fire wood. 
 

January 02, 2021, 03:09:55 PM
Reply #5
Offline

sarapuk

Case-Files Achievement Recipient
There is no mention of fear of any person or animal in any diary.  Dyatlov may have wanted to try his stove out.  https://forum.dyatlovpass.com/index.php?topic=691.msg10392#msg10392

And the two Yuris went to the wood lower down for fire wood.

It is alleged that some of the notes or diary entries that the Dyatlov Group wrote, went missing.
DB
 

January 02, 2021, 10:25:19 PM
Reply #6
Offline

Morski


Afraid from "something" ? And how would pitching the tent up on a highly visible place, makes it safer? They had nowhere to hide or run up there. And, after all, they went exatcly to the woods.
"Truth is the most valuable thing we have. Let us economize it." Mark Twain
 

January 03, 2021, 02:08:38 PM
Reply #7
Offline

sarapuk

Case-Files Achievement Recipient
Afraid from "something" ? And how would pitching the tent up on a highly visible place, makes it safer? They had nowhere to hide or run up there. And, after all, they went exatcly to the woods.

Yes I know it sounds a bit contradictory but if their fear was severe then they may have thought that being on an exposed Mountainside was safer than being down in or near the Forest. Until of course the Event that sent them back down to the Forest.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2021, 03:01:35 PM by sarapuk »
DB
 

January 05, 2021, 12:10:25 PM
Reply #8

eurocentric

Guest
Thinking out Loud....


I see them succumbing to something very rapidly down in the woods off the pass. For some reason they are down in the woods poorly dressed for the severe conditions.

<snipped>


I'm with you on the gist of this. Everyone seems to accept, bar two flail chests (where the exact set of rib fractures coincidentally mirror those which can be sustained in resus), that the hikers all died of hypothermia, and that was the conclusion of the pathologist. But they don't seem to be prepared to even consider hypothermia starting on the exposed ridge, even with half the group partly stripped off, inside an old, unheated WW2-era canvas tent, with a hole so large it needed a coat to plug it, and another hole left by an unpacked stove flue, and with an estimated wind chill outside of -31C, static at -22C, which means at least -12C inside the tent at 9pm, and falling as the night progressed.

I think they probably planned to light their stove later on, at bedtime, and wouldn't have anyone as watcher to replenish the stove's small grate through the night, and couldn't risk the stove going out in the middle of the night, at the coldest time, when everyone was asleep, or there'd be possibility of one or more slipping into a hypothermic coma in their sleep and being found dead in the morning.

Perhaps they thought they could tough it out, but as the night wore on their core temperatures slowly fell, and they didn't realise what was happening because the effect was gradual.

When new to the DPI every single source informs they "cut their way out of the tent and fled in panic", which assumes their metabolic rates and brain functions were entirely unimpeded by the cold and only after this time did they slowly freeze. This then requires the imagining of various emergencies, absolutely none of which were supported by physical evidence, all while the cold provided atypical evidence all around and is matched to previous and subsequent cases.

Instead I see their leaving, their behaviour, as that of a slow and confused befuddlement, forgetting to take what was needed, concerning themselves only with leaving that exposed position or they would freeze to death. If people can remove clothes and terminal burrow due to the effects of hypothermia they can do all manner of other irrational things under its influence.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2021, 12:37:09 PM by eurocentric »
 

January 05, 2021, 12:34:23 PM
Reply #9

DAXXY

Guest
They were used to being out in very cold temperatures.  I think They were fine in the tent. Then had to help with a search when the 2 yuris didn't return.  They left the tent normally then lowered it by slackening off the guy ropes and put snow on it to protect it from the wind.  The fact they left the flashlights indicates they wanted to return to the tent that night in the dark, and not abandon it.  The flashlights were their path back to the tent, like a rope.  They went out further and further looking for the 2 Yuris until they found them at the cedar tree.
They were in layers of wool socks which stay warm even when wet.
Once the tent was lowered and snow put on it wouldn't be practical to go back to it and try and get coats etc.
They all go in the same direction because they knew the direction the 2 yuris had gone (probably for fire wood for the stove) and possibly could see their tracks.
If they were abandoning the tent they would have taken more things and equipment and headed towards the food store in the other direction towards the river. (the way they climbed up)
They had no reason to take things.  They were just searching for their friends who they probably expected to meet coming back with fire wood a little way out from the camp.  Ski boots would have been slippery and no good on the slope. 
It was the first searcher at the tent who cut it open.  It's very hard to cut loose cloth, it has to be taught for the knife blade to cut.  It would have been taught near the top where there are cuts probably from outside.  Otherwise the person needed to step on the tent and put his knife under the cloth and lift the cloth with the blade to make it taught so the blade would cut it. So it appears to be done from inside but the person is outside and reaching in under the cloth with his knife.  Sorry..Hope I'm making sense...
« Last Edit: January 05, 2021, 12:45:44 PM by DAXXY »
 

January 05, 2021, 12:46:20 PM
Reply #10

eurocentric

Guest
Wood was found in the tent, in one corner of it.
At this web site:



"D in the far part of the tent where stored the food - cereals, cans, sugar, and wood for the stove"

Nobody gets used to such plummeting temperatures, they were not superhumans, and if you do adjust, for a time, that will be limited by your liver's ability to keep on producing blood sugars and burning off fats to regulate your core temperature, in the human stove, to normal levels.

With -31C wind chill outside frostbite is risked within 20 to 30 minutes.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2021, 12:53:19 PM by eurocentric »
 

January 05, 2021, 12:56:28 PM
Reply #11

DAXXY

Guest
Yes but not much detail.  They wanted enough wood for a whole night and maybe some hot drinks.  3 or 4 pieces would burn very quickly. Also Is that drawing just an explanation of how a typical tent would be organised for the group. ?  Is it factual or just someone telling someone else how they normally did things.
The fire wood is just a suggestion.  It is plausible.  Why the 2 yuris were in the wood?   because that is where the fire wood is. But...they could have been missing for some other reason..maybe one got sick suddenly. Maybe a white out came on them quickly.  We will never know.  But for some reason the others leave the tent to search for them.

They may have needed even more fire wood because this was only the first night.  They were going to go 10km along to another mountain the next day and return.  Surely then they would not move the tent.  So this was going to be a two night base tent before they dropped back down to their store.  (I'm guessing here though )
« Last Edit: January 05, 2021, 04:18:14 PM by DAXXY »
 

January 05, 2021, 01:22:58 PM
Reply #12

DAXXY

Guest
Good information here on the stove and fuel. Also maybe they were selective about fuel.  Maybe Birch was better fuel but was further away so the 2 Yuris had to go further to find it. 

https://forum.dyatlovpass.com/index.php?topic=691.msg10392#msg10392
 

January 05, 2021, 07:05:36 PM
Reply #13
Offline

RMK


DAXXY:

I appreciate what you're trying to do here, and in other threads in which you've recently posted.  In particular, I like that you're trying to come up with "alternative" reasons for why the Dyatlov team abandoned their campsite, or in the words of mk,
I like that you're exploring ideas outside the box: looking at non-catastrophic reasons they may have left the tent.
I have recently been questioning some items of "common knowledge" about the Dyatlov Pass Incident as not-necessarily-true inferences gleaned from bare facts, e.g.,
Still another would be that the Dyatlov hikers descended the slope and abandoned their campsite due to fear of a lethal threat in or around the tent.  I honestly have major difficulty imagining any other reason why they would leave their campsite.  But, again, "fear of lethal threat" is also an inference from facts.

My point is that maybe we DPI sleuths have put on "cognitive blinders" concerning some aspect of this case, and maybe we need to re-examine what we know believe.

So, I salute your efforts, but the scenario you propose is simply not credible.

First and foremost: you suggest that the two Yuris went downhill to the treeline to collect firewood, but without skis, perhaps unshod, and without donning their outerwear that most protects them from the elements?  I might believe that they could have done that, if (1) it weren't wintertime in the Ural Mountains (where it is never not windy), and/or (2) the terrain of Kholat Syakhl weren't so rocky, and/or (3) there was only a non-trivial amount of snow on the slope.  Think about it--that's almost a mile away from the tent, over rocky terrain, and through snow of varying depths.

Second, the Dyatlov party did not use the stove on the night of 1-2 February 1959, and had no intention of doing so.  That much is implied by Igor Dyatlov's diary entry on 1/31.  Moreover, on the evening of February 1, 1959, the Dyatlovites did not erect their tent in a configuration that would permit use of the stove.  AFAIU, the tent could be pitched in two different configurations.  One was "high-profile", for forest campsites sheltered from the wind, under which the stove could be deployed.  The other was "low-profile", for campsites exposed to strong wind, under which the stove could not be deployed, in no small part because the stove was suspended from a cable that had to be hitched to two trees (again, AFAIU).

But, by all means, please keep questioning the conventional wisdom!  This case could use a breath of fresh air (and I have high hopes for Teddy's book...).
 

January 06, 2021, 04:18:53 AM
Reply #14

eurocentric

Guest
Yes but not much detail.  They wanted enough wood for a whole night and maybe some hot drinks.  3 or 4 pieces would burn very quickly. Also Is that drawing just an explanation of how a typical tent would be organised for the group. ?  Is it factual or just someone telling someone else how they normally did things.
The fire wood is just a suggestion.  It is plausible.  Why the 2 yuris were in the wood?   because that is where the fire wood is. But...they could have been missing for some other reason..maybe one got sick suddenly. Maybe a white out came on them quickly.  We will never know.  But for some reason the others leave the tent to search for them.

They may have needed even more fire wood because this was only the first night.  They were going to go 10km along to another mountain the next day and return.  Surely then they would not move the tent.  So this was going to be a two night base tent before they dropped back down to their store.  (I'm guessing here though )

It's on the page below, and was how the tent was found. That illustration also depicts how the stove design was normally suspended from the tent ridge, but on the night it wasn't set up, remaining unpacked.

https://dyatlovpass.com/1959-search?flp=1#the-tent

 

January 06, 2021, 06:16:35 AM
Reply #15

DAXXY

Guest
Dyatlovs diary 31/1

Had a surprisingly good overnight, air is warm and dry, though it’s -18C to -24C.
 It's nearly 4.  Wind not strong
Thin birch grove replaces firs
Firewood is scarce, mostly damp firs. (Meaning Birch is better ?)
We build the campfire on the logs, Dinner’s in the tent. Nice and warm. Can’t imagine such comfort on the ridge, with howling wind outside, hundreds of kilometers away from human settlements.

He doesn't say without a stove, or that the stove is not usable on the pass.


This fire wood idea is just my plausible suggestion ...We don't know what was happening at the tent, we will never know. Until time machines are invented  grin1   Perhaps they climbed up and while they pitched the tent the 2 yuris offered to go for firewood.  They could see the treeline.  They were going to be based on the pass for 2 nights so they could go to Otorton 10km away and return.  Dyatlov wanted to try his stove in the low tent when the yuris returned with 2 nights worth of firewood...This is all plausible.  Maybe while the Yuris were away a fast white out blizzard happened and they became stuck down in the woods with the firewood so lit a fire to keep warm...again..plausible..

Lets go out on a limb now  grin1...while looking among fallen trees collecting firewood one of the yuris disturbs a hibernation site of snakes and gets bitten.  There are snakes there and this is often how people are bitten.  There are 3 possible venomous snakes there
The common Adder (Vipera berus) and its sub-species (Vipera beros Nikolski) and also the Siberian pit viper (Gloydius halys).  All have been known to make people ill and kill people,  and venom during and immediately after hibernation is particularly potent so they can hunt effectively after hibernation to get the food they need to recover from hibernation and to compete with others in order to mate.  So one of the Yuris becomes sick with snake bite possibly anaphylaxis reaction.   grin1...WoW !  Yes you immediately find this difficult.  ..but it's still plausible isn't it ? thousands of people get a snake bite every year collecting fire wood....and there would be no 'evidence' of it...but it is just one plausible scenario of how the incident began...Is that the reason Yuri Krivonischenko had no socks and the bottom left half of his long underwear is missing up to the knee??   he got bitten on his feet or left ankle through the socks and removed the socks and lower leg of his long underwear ?  ..Its plausible.   grin1  but un-provable.  Also the pathologist would not be looking for a tiny puncture wound or testing for snake venom toxins, or anaphylaxis reaction. 


Dyatlov was still developing the stove.  see here part 2...
 https://forum.dyatlovpass.com/index.php?topic=691.msg10392#msg10392

When explorers were above the treeline seems to have been an issue.  They were in their low volume tent because it made heating more efficient and made less wind resistance, at their highest altitude and coldest, but without a stove.  Dyatlov was solving this.

On his 1958 expedition there are photos of fire wood being used above the tree line with the tent in it's low configuration for heat efficiency.
https://dyatlovpass.com/gallery-1958-Subpolar-Ural?lid=1



Is it a concrete fact that the stove was redundant in their tent that night. ?? 
IF THE STOVE WAS REDUNDANT WHY WOULD THEY CARRY IT UP TO THE PASS WHEN THEY LIGHTENED THEIR LOAD DOWN AT THE STORE ?
Or did they not set the stove up because not everyone was back at the tent.  Maybe everyone had to be in the low tent before they set the stove up.  (Can you imagine 9 adults in a low tent with a fire stove above them...any excessive movement would be dangerous.)  The two Yuris were not back, and the incident starts from there. This is all plausible.  I would like to run a real experiment in snow with wool socks, just to see the insulation quality.  Unfortunately there is no snow where I am. 
Y.  Doroshenko had
On the left leg are two pairs of knitted light brown socks with tears, woolen white socks burnt
On the right leg tatter from a cotton sock, and a white woolen sock
Y Krivonischenko had
Just a torn cotton sock

But they had their clothes taken by others so we can't be sure what they were wearing, possibly Valenki.  (Just a guess)


The 2 yuris went without ski's ?  yes because ski's are no good looking for firewood in among trees. why ski down, take the ski's off search for firewood in slippery smooth soled stiff ski-boots only to have to carry ski's and wood back up slipping all the time and dropping the wood.  Layers of wool socks may have been a better option or Valenki maybe.  Wool keeps you warm even if it is wet...They wouldn't just ski along snapping branches off the trees.  the firewood would have been on the ground they would have been in undergrowth and stepping over fallen trees etc.

http://www.tomasdabas.eu/life-health/winter-barefoot-walking/
Winter barefoot walking hazards and precautions.

3)  Lack of decent movement. You need to constantly keep moving at least a bit. The more you move, the better since movement increases blood circulation and blood circulation in your feet means HOT feet on cold snow. Sounds impossible, but is quite easy to achieve and it feels amazing getting that warmth from inside.
Is this the reason for the jacket outside the tent, Someone was standing on it while they discussed how to search for the two Yuris ?
'at the entrance of the tent in the snow was an ice axe. Near the ice axe was lying Dyatlov's jacket'.
https://dyatlovpass.com/1959-search?flp=1#the-tent



Also getting WET was the really important issue which they would have understood.  They knew that being dry in cold was much safer than being sweaty or wet (from rain) in the same cold. Look at Semyon Zolotaryov's  rolled up newspaper in his back trouser pocket.
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-349-351?rbid=17743
It was to be used to pack under WET clothes to create an air space to keep warm. 


« Last Edit: January 06, 2021, 11:03:15 AM by DAXXY »
 

January 06, 2021, 12:00:06 PM
Reply #16
Offline

sarapuk

Case-Files Achievement Recipient
Dyatlovs diary 31/1

Had a surprisingly good overnight, air is warm and dry, though it’s -18C to -24C.
 It's nearly 4.  Wind not strong
Thin birch grove replaces firs
Firewood is scarce, mostly damp firs. (Meaning Birch is better ?)
We build the campfire on the logs, Dinner’s in the tent. Nice and warm. Can’t imagine such comfort on the ridge, with howling wind outside, hundreds of kilometers away from human settlements.

He doesn't say without a stove, or that the stove is not usable on the pass.


This fire wood idea is just my plausible suggestion ...We don't know what was happening at the tent, we will never know. Until time machines are invented  grin1   Perhaps they climbed up and while they pitched the tent the 2 yuris offered to go for firewood.  They could see the treeline.  They were going to be based on the pass for 2 nights so they could go to Otorton 10km away and return.  Dyatlov wanted to try his stove in the low tent when the yuris returned with 2 nights worth of firewood...This is all plausible.  Maybe while the Yuris were away a fast white out blizzard happened and they became stuck down in the woods with the firewood so lit a fire to keep warm...again..plausible..

Lets go out on a limb now  grin1...while looking among fallen trees collecting firewood one of the yuris disturbs a hibernation site of snakes and gets bitten.  There are snakes there and this is often how people are bitten.  There are 3 possible venomous snakes there
The common Adder (Vipera berus) and its sub-species (Vipera beros Nikolski) and also the Siberian pit viper (Gloydius halys).  All have been known to make people ill and kill people,  and venom during and immediately after hibernation is particularly potent so they can hunt effectively after hibernation to get the food they need to recover from hibernation and to compete with others in order to mate.  So one of the Yuris becomes sick with snake bite possibly anaphylaxis reaction.   grin1...WoW !  Yes you immediately find this difficult.  ..but it's still plausible isn't it ? thousands of people get a snake bite every year collecting fire wood....and there would be no 'evidence' of it...but it is just one plausible scenario of how the incident began...Is that the reason Yuri Krivonischenko had no socks and the bottom left half of his long underwear is missing up to the knee??   he got bitten on his feet or left ankle through the socks and removed the socks and lower leg of his long underwear ?  ..Its plausible.   grin1  but un-provable.  Also the pathologist would not be looking for a tiny puncture wound or testing for snake venom toxins, or anaphylaxis reaction. 


Dyatlov was still developing the stove.  see here part 2...
 https://forum.dyatlovpass.com/index.php?topic=691.msg10392#msg10392

When explorers were above the treeline seems to have been an issue.  They were in their low volume tent because it made heating more efficient and made less wind resistance, at their highest altitude and coldest, but without a stove.  Dyatlov was solving this.

On his 1958 expedition there are photos of fire wood being used above the tree line with the tent in it's low configuration for heat efficiency.
https://dyatlovpass.com/gallery-1958-Subpolar-Ural?lid=1



Is it a concrete fact that the stove was redundant in their tent that night. ?? 
IF THE STOVE WAS REDUNDANT WHY WOULD THEY CARRY IT UP TO THE PASS WHEN THEY LIGHTENED THEIR LOAD DOWN AT THE STORE ?
Or did they not set the stove up because not everyone was back at the tent.  Maybe everyone had to be in the low tent before they set the stove up.  (Can you imagine 9 adults in a low tent with a fire stove above them...any excessive movement would be dangerous.)  The two Yuris were not back, and the incident starts from there. This is all plausible.  I would like to run a real experiment in snow with wool socks, just to see the insulation quality.  Unfortunately there is no snow where I am. 
Y.  Doroshenko had
On the left leg are two pairs of knitted light brown socks with tears, woolen white socks burnt
On the right leg tatter from a cotton sock, and a white woolen sock
Y Krivonischenko had
Just a torn cotton sock

But they had their clothes taken by others so we can't be sure what they were wearing, possibly Valenki.  (Just a guess)


The 2 yuris went without ski's ?  yes because ski's are no good looking for firewood in among trees. why ski down, take the ski's off search for firewood in slippery smooth soled stiff ski-boots only to have to carry ski's and wood back up slipping all the time and dropping the wood.  Layers of wool socks may have been a better option or Valenki maybe.  Wool keeps you warm even if it is wet...They wouldn't just ski along snapping branches off the trees.  the firewood would have been on the ground they would have been in undergrowth and stepping over fallen trees etc.

http://www.tomasdabas.eu/life-health/winter-barefoot-walking/
Winter barefoot walking hazards and precautions.

3)  Lack of decent movement. You need to constantly keep moving at least a bit. The more you move, the better since movement increases blood circulation and blood circulation in your feet means HOT feet on cold snow. Sounds impossible, but is quite easy to achieve and it feels amazing getting that warmth from inside.
Is this the reason for the jacket outside the tent, Someone was standing on it while they discussed how to search for the two Yuris ?
'at the entrance of the tent in the snow was an ice axe. Near the ice axe was lying Dyatlov's jacket'.
https://dyatlovpass.com/1959-search?flp=1#the-tent



Also getting WET was the really important issue which they would have understood.  They knew that being dry in cold was much safer than being sweaty or wet (from rain) in the same cold. Look at Semyon Zolotaryov's  rolled up newspaper in his back trouser pocket.
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-349-351?rbid=17743
It was to be used to pack under WET clothes to create an air space to keep warm.

Yes according to all known reports the Stove was not set up to be used on the alleged last night. They must have intended its use though for the remaining part of their expedition so thats why they carried it all the way.
DB
 

January 06, 2021, 01:02:37 PM
Reply #17

DAXXY

Guest
When they lightened their load to climb up the pass why not just leave the stove in the store ?   Why would experienced people storing items before climbing take a stove they weren't planning to use ? The goal of the expedition was to reach Otorten , a mountain 10 kilometres (6.2 mi) north of the site where the tent was. 

I think the tent location was a base where they would set out from the next day then return to at night, after exploring Otorten, then pack up the following morning and descend back down to their store.

They couldn't carry firewood at the time of the climb as each person had their own equipment to carry.  But once at the top, while some are putting the tent up, the 2 Yuris could go down the slope to the treeline on the other side of the pass to collect enough fire wood for their time on the pass.
 

January 07, 2021, 01:00:31 PM
Reply #18
Offline

sarapuk

Case-Files Achievement Recipient
When they lightened their load to climb up the pass why not just leave the stove in the store ?   Why would experienced people storing items before climbing take a stove they weren't planning to use ? The goal of the expedition was to reach Otorten , a mountain 10 kilometres (6.2 mi) north of the site where the tent was. 

I think the tent location was a base where they would set out from the next day then return to at night, after exploring Otorten, then pack up the following morning and descend back down to their store.

They couldn't carry firewood at the time of the climb as each person had their own equipment to carry.  But once at the top, while some are putting the tent up, the 2 Yuris could go down the slope to the treeline on the other side of the pass to collect enough fire wood for their time on the pass.

Well another good theory. I suppose it depended on the weather as well. And they had no 'Radio Equipment' so they couldnt get a weather forecast. They must have struggled in those weather conditions, so how long would it have taken them to travel 3 miles and then back to the Tent  ! ?
DB
 

January 07, 2021, 03:01:14 PM
Reply #19

DAXXY

Guest
Difficult to guess.  1500 m to the cedar.   Call it a mile.  The snow in the search photos doesn't look deep but there may have been deeper drifts lower down.  It depends on the weather.  They wouldn't have left for fire wood in terrible weather or with it about to get dark.  I think they would have aimed to stay within a safe time period bearing in mind also that people couldn't settle down until they were back with the fuel for the stove.  But they were fit and enjoyed a challenge and collecting the firewood would have also involved a sense of duty to the group (so some compulsion there).
They could see the treeline from the tent. It looks like mixed pine/cedar and birch so birch would have been good fuel.









« Last Edit: January 07, 2021, 03:12:59 PM by DAXXY »
 

January 10, 2021, 11:35:37 AM
Reply #20
Offline

mk


...The 2 yuris went without ski's ?  yes because ski's are no good looking for firewood in among trees. why ski down, take the ski's off search for firewood in slippery smooth soled stiff ski-boots only to have to carry ski's and wood back up slipping all the time and dropping the wood.  Layers of wool socks may have been a better option or Valenki maybe.  Wool keeps you warm even if it is wet...They wouldn't just ski along snapping branches off the trees.  the firewood would have been on the ground they would have been in undergrowth and stepping over fallen trees etc....
Yes, I can believe this.  I remember (feels like I've written this before) in college up north, in the middle of an icy winter, I foolishly wore a pair of pretty but inappropriate shoes to class. I slipped and fell very hard on the ice.  I was so disgusted with myself that I took off the shoes and walked home over the ice in quite thin cotton socks.  I was surprised that it was so comfortable walking on ice in my socks.  Not much colder than wearing the shoes, and the socks had very good traction!

However, there were valenki still in the tent. 7 boots, to be exact.  While some of them may have chosen to wear wool socks instead of ski boots, I honestly can't imagine three of them choosing not to slip on their valenki when leaving the tent.  And why on earth would Slobodin put on only ONE boot??

Received by Temnikov
28.2 1315
To Sulman
Maslennikov is not here, he is in the mountains will be back in about an hour. I was at Dyatlov tent there are backpacks 9 pcs a few storm jackets, 3.5 pairs of felt boots, eight pairs of boots one pair is missing and - other personal items and food supplies but not all the products some of it should be somewhere else.
Nevolin


 

January 10, 2021, 02:39:06 PM
Reply #21

DAXXY

Guest
He wouldn't take one boot he probably lost one in deep snow or when the others were digging him out of a collapsed den.  I think they were called out of the tent by the two leaders dyatlov and Zolotaryov....Zolotaryov collapsed the tent while Dyatlov spoke to the group (or vice-versa) on how to search for the 2 missing Yuri's who had gone for firewood in the forest and were overdue. While they are standing there dyatlov gives his jacket to someone to stand on until they start moving.  That's why his jacket is outside the tent. They can't get their valenki once the tent is collapsed..they collapse the tent and put snow on top to weigh it down so wind doesn't lift it and destroy it.  The cuts in the tent were made by the first searchers to arrive.
 

January 11, 2021, 10:59:20 AM
Reply #22
Offline

sarapuk

Case-Files Achievement Recipient
...The 2 yuris went without ski's ?  yes because ski's are no good looking for firewood in among trees. why ski down, take the ski's off search for firewood in slippery smooth soled stiff ski-boots only to have to carry ski's and wood back up slipping all the time and dropping the wood.  Layers of wool socks may have been a better option or Valenki maybe.  Wool keeps you warm even if it is wet...They wouldn't just ski along snapping branches off the trees.  the firewood would have been on the ground they would have been in undergrowth and stepping over fallen trees etc....
Yes, I can believe this.  I remember (feels like I've written this before) in college up north, in the middle of an icy winter, I foolishly wore a pair of pretty but inappropriate shoes to class. I slipped and fell very hard on the ice.  I was so disgusted with myself that I took off the shoes and walked home over the ice in quite thin cotton socks.  I was surprised that it was so comfortable walking on ice in my socks.  Not much colder than wearing the shoes, and the socks had very good traction!

However, there were valenki still in the tent. 7 boots, to be exact.  While some of them may have chosen to wear wool socks instead of ski boots, I honestly can't imagine three of them choosing not to slip on their valenki when leaving the tent.  And why on earth would Slobodin put on only ONE boot??

Received by Temnikov
28.2 1315
To Sulman
Maslennikov is not here, he is in the mountains will be back in about an hour. I was at Dyatlov tent there are backpacks 9 pcs a few storm jackets, 3.5 pairs of felt boots, eight pairs of boots one pair is missing and - other personal items and food supplies but not all the products some of it should be somewhere else.
Nevolin


Know what you mean about you walking on ice in those cotton socks. There are situations when you can get away with it. But I still find it hard to believe that anyone in that area of Siberia where the Dyatlov Group were last camped would contemplate walking a mile or so without proper clothing and footwear in severe weather conditions.
DB
 

January 11, 2021, 01:28:51 PM
Reply #23
Offline

mk


Know what you mean about you walking on ice in those cotton socks. There are situations when you can get away with it. But I still find it hard to believe that anyone in that area of Siberia where the Dyatlov Group were last camped would contemplate walking a mile or so without proper clothing and footwear in severe weather conditions.
Yes, I agree with you.  But I think Daxxy is trying to say that several pairs of socks, including very thick, heavy wool socks, would be considered proper footwear in the circumstances.  It may be that, given the choice of clumsy ski boots and several layers of wool socks, they chose the wool socks. 

I thought they all had valenki, but it seems that only some of them did.  There were only 7 valenki boots found in the tent, and Rustem was wearing the 8th.  I wouldn't be amazed to learn that several pairs of socks substituted for valenki in a pinch.  But whether they were the right sort of thing to wear for gathering firewood or searching for lost friends is still up for debate.  So much depends on what their ski boots were like. 

It's worthwhile to note that Maslennikov describes them as "barefoot" in the radiograms.  As the head of UPI sports club and a Master of Sports, he ought to have recognized whether or not their sock-arrangements were "camp-socks" or just socks without shoes.  He seemed to think they were merely missing their shoes, not wearing camp-socks.

To me, however, the whole question seems irrelevant since there were three pairs of valenki still in the tent.  It's one thing not to have any other options; it's another not to use the good footwear you have. 
 

January 11, 2021, 05:43:34 PM
Reply #24
Offline

Manti


About the stove

That the stove was not used is a fact. That it wasn't intended to be used, is not. Not only was it in the tent, but there was also some firewood in the tent. Why carry firewood if you don't intend to use it and you know from maps that you will reach a wooded area next night? And also, why put the stove in the tent if you don't intend to set it up? It's metal, not comfortable to bump into while trying to sleep. Personally I'd just put it in the snow outside the tent if it's not to be used that night.

About the snake bite

Daxxy, this is very interesting that you came up with this possibility. I was perplexed  since in one of the autopsies in the case files, I will have to go and search I don't remember which one, but a scar is mentioned on someone's arm that has an "incision" around it. It seemed to make no sense but perhaps it was a makeshift way to try to stop the venom from spreading.

About not putting on boots


Whether multiple socks and a valenki might be acceptable for going to collect firewood, I don't know. But don't forget that coats were left in the tent too. This cannot be explained by the coats being wet because of sweating, because that would mean lower layers of clothing would be even wetter, so if anything it would make more sense to go out with just coats with nothing underneath...
Update: found it, it's Yuri Doroshenko with the "incision" around a wound: https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-104-111
« Last Edit: January 11, 2021, 05:51:12 PM by Manti »


 

January 11, 2021, 08:24:23 PM
Reply #25
Offline

mk


Update: found it, it's Yuri Doroshenko with the "incision" around a wound: https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-104-111
Is it this/these?
On the inner right arm, in the middle third, there are two 2 x 1.5 cm irregular-shaped brown red parchment-like abrasions without hemorrhages in the adjacent tissue. In the area of these abrasions, two linear incisions are made...
On the inner left forearm, between the middle third and the lower third, there is a 0.6 x 0.5 cm irregular-shaped oval skin wound. The edges of the wound are slightly pressed down and covered with clotted blood. An incision was made around this wound, and hemorrhaging in the adjacent soft tissues was found.


It's hard for me to tell whether the writer is saying that an incision was made as part of the autopsy, or found during the autopsy.
 

January 11, 2021, 09:57:57 PM
Reply #26
Offline

RidgeWatcher


An incision was performed during the autopsy to determine if sub-dermal or subcutaneous hemorrhage was present.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2021, 11:35:51 PM by RidgeWatcher »
 

January 12, 2021, 02:26:43 AM
Reply #27
Offline

Nigel Evans


Update: found it, it's Yuri Doroshenko with the "incision" around a wound: https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-104-111
Is it this/these?
On the inner right arm, in the middle third, there are two 2 x 1.5 cm irregular-shaped brown red parchment-like abrasions without hemorrhages in the adjacent tissue. In the area of these abrasions, two linear incisions are made...
On the inner left forearm, between the middle third and the lower third, there is a 0.6 x 0.5 cm irregular-shaped oval skin wound. The edges of the wound are slightly pressed down and covered with clotted blood. An incision was made around this wound, and hemorrhaging in the adjacent soft tissues was found.


It's hard for me to tell whether the writer is saying that an incision was made as part of the autopsy, or found during the autopsy.


I don't think he would record his actions on the bodies. If he did there would be a lot of them! Yuri D also had a scalpel wound across the back of his hand. Don't forget that he probably fell out of the cedar.
Correction: YuriK had the scalpel wound.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2021, 09:27:29 AM by Nigel Evans »
 

January 12, 2021, 07:14:14 AM
Reply #28

DAXXY

Guest
Update: found it, it's Yuri Doroshenko with the "incision" around a wound: https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-104-111
Is it this/these?
On the inner right arm, in the middle third, there are two 2 x 1.5 cm irregular-shaped brown red parchment-like abrasions without hemorrhages in the adjacent tissue. In the area of these abrasions, two linear incisions are made...
On the inner left forearm, between the middle third and the lower third, there is a 0.6 x 0.5 cm irregular-shaped oval skin wound. The edges of the wound are slightly pressed down and covered with clotted blood. An incision was made around this wound, and hemorrhaging in the adjacent soft tissues was found.




It's hard for me to tell whether the writer is saying that an incision was made as part of the autopsy, or found during the autopsy.



This is an interesting find....
On the inner left forearm, between the middle third and the lower third, there is a 0.6 x 0.5 cm irregular-shaped oval skin wound. The edges of the wound are slightly pressed down and covered with clotted blood. An incision was made around this wound, and hemorrhaging in the adjacent soft tissues was found. The soft tissue in the back of the left hand is slightly swollen and brown-red in color.
https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-104-111



The right arm incisions are odd but may have been when they were removing clothing with a knife. Strange its all inner arm.  You would carry firewood either under one arm or in both your arms with your inner arms facing up and in contact with the wood.  If there was a snake involved it could have come out from the wood and bitten the one carrying the firewood. They could easily have collected a piece of wood that had a snake sheltering inside a cavity if the wood was on the ground, they would have had their sweaters on but possibly sleeve pushed up exposing the inner left forearm.  The left arm is more significant, an oval wound. half a centimetre, and hemorrhaging in to the surrounding tissues which is how pit viper venom works. This could mean a small oval puncture wound with bruising but a surrounding incision makes this interesting for snake bite.  It's not a linear incision from cutting off clothing.  Did they try and cut around a snake bite ?  The left hand is swollen and discolored also. The right hand is swollen but not discolored.  Half a centimetre is a small bite site but it could be a baby snake which is just as poisonous as an adult. Or an adult that had one fang missing.  Snakes replace broken fangs regularly.
A bite  from a common adder (vipera berus) or Siberian pit viper (Gloydius halys) would have been potent if the snake was disturbed during hibernation. 

I don't know about the toxicity of the Siberian viper but they can both cause anaphylactic reaction.  They were fit healthy young men so without an Anaphylactic reaction I don't see one of them succumbing rapidly to the snakes toxins. But if one was bitten and they tried to deal with it while he was going in to anaphylactic shock that would certainly be a good reason why the 2 Yuris became stuck at the cedar tree. He may have been bitten some time before they reached the tree.  The Siberian pit viper (Gloydius halys) and the Common Adder (vipera berus) and it's sub-species Nicolsky's Viper (Vipera berus nikolskii) all have a melanistic (black) group.  Being cold blooded the black color helps them warm up quickly in cold places for hunting.

So here is a casualty and the other Yuri is torn between leaving him and getting to the tent for help or staying with him and climbing the tree to try and be seen from the tent.  He stays with him, and makes a fire from the firewood they had, climbing the tree when he can to try and summon help. 

This link shows a common adder bite but without anaphylactic shock.  It does look like a single puncture wound.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/pensioner-attacked-venomous-snake-back-11257721

https://www.newsweek.com/world-cup-fifa-snake-venom-1000478


« Last Edit: January 12, 2021, 01:58:01 PM by DAXXY »
 

January 12, 2021, 11:43:26 AM
Reply #29

DAXXY

Guest
If he had ever had a bee or wasp sting (hymenoptera) there would be increased chance of anaphylaxis from a viper bite

'Our patient was stung by hymenoptera, so the anaphylaxis may be the result of cross-reactivity between viper venom and hymenoptera'

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0394632015572566