1
General Discussion / Re: Is there evidence for outsiders?
« Last post by GlennM on May 15, 2024, 02:47:53 PM »Much has been made of camping in the woods where the tree fall happened. Tree ring data and a can have been produced. The bodies were located nearby etc. If, however someone was as invested in scouring the tent site on 1079, could there be new discoveries? Human waste and waste paper would have washed and weathered away decades ago. Could there be other debris? In today's world it is customary to pack out your trash, but in 1959, tossing it aside may have been the norm. As I recall some tinned opened food was found in the tent, but not nine people's worth of food. What of that? What of scorched earth of an outdoor cooking fire? Charcoal can be carbon tested. Has that hillside been burned since 1959? It seems nobody can pinpoint where the tent was on 1079, so a wider search circle seems prudent. I do not think discarded cans found on 1079 would be from the recovery teams.
Teddy regrets it was not treated as a crime scene, as do we all. Significantly though, when the tent was initially approached, no one noted anything about it or the immediate area pointing to foul play. It was a straight forward rescue, then recovery.
That reminds me whether luminol which detects blood residue could be used in the field or on samples for later testing.
Teddy regrets it was not treated as a crime scene, as do we all. Significantly though, when the tent was initially approached, no one noted anything about it or the immediate area pointing to foul play. It was a straight forward rescue, then recovery.
That reminds me whether luminol which detects blood residue could be used in the field or on samples for later testing.