1
General Discussion / Re: Book "1079"
« Last post by GlennM on Today at 06:42:32 AM »Axelrod, it is called an " ad hominum" logical fallacy.
In your version, everyone would never run out of the tent at once without shoes. Why would Slobodin run out of the tent in one shoe? It's also nonsense that they would cut up the tent because of this.
Another nice illusion that everyone believes is that the "returning" trio on the slope voluntarily froze to death without cause, and the couple by the fire also voluntarily froze to death without cause. All of this is a naive idea.
It all happened because there was a threat that Krivonischenko captured in the last shot of his camera, and from which he and Doroshenko were hiding on a cedar tree. The threat from the tent continued up the slope to the cedar, but there was no escape from it. It left a trail of destruction on the slope and by the cedar. Its consequences is captured in Zolotaryov's damaged photographs.
That's all.
It may feel a little mysterious, but it's not.
One camera captures the threat, the other captures its consequences, and that is the key to everything.
Nature only finished the work, but did not begin it.
I like the idea of a slab slide on 1079 being the impetus for all subsequent choices including actions at the cedar and the ravine.You are already constantly repeating this spam about a snow slide, and you write it in almost every topic. Do you want people to believe this? Do you think you are so smart? Then write this text in your signature and do not clutter your messages with this text
As I understand it , sometimes the translation jumps between fir and spruce tree. There are the broken branches from the ceder and they are used in the fire , some of the remaining branches do not reach the ground , some of these are raw ( or not as dry). There are fir or spruce branches under the two Yuri's ( insulation)
In parallel, there's a number of small spruce trees cut or broken off . These range up to 20 and I would suspect the trees found in the den flooring are those trees plus one birch. There is speculation that these young trees were used for a snow hole in this testimony and this is exactly what is found in May.
Somewhere in my gut feeling I think the group, or some of the group got wet . To make a fire and a den at separate locations seems a bit counter intuitive . It would seem the group followed the creek down from 1079 and perhaps up the ravine to where they were found .( Path of least resistance?).
Once past the first 2 meters on the ceder , I think it would be relatively easy to climb ,a bit like a ladder . They would just feel for the easy branches to break, the dryer ones would give way.
It was definitely not necessary to break branches up to 5 m high because of the fire. The purpose of breaking branches was different.
Those above needed shelter, those below used the branches as torches.
Atmanaki
”Most of the dry branches up to 5 m were broken. Beside this, the side of the tree facing the slope and the tent was completely cleared of branches. These were not dry; they were young and were not used. Some of them were just lying on the ground, and the others were hanging on the lower branches of the cedar. It looked as if someone had created a viewing hide facing the site from where they came.”
It was definitely not necessary to break branches up to 5 m high because of the fire. The purpose of breaking branches was different.
Those above needed shelter, those below used the branches as torches.
Atmanaki
”Most of the dry branches up to 5 m were broken. Beside this, the side of the tree facing the slope and the tent was completely cleared of branches. These were not dry; they were young and were not used. Some of them were just lying on the ground, and the others were hanging on the lower branches of the cedar. It looked as if someone had created a viewing hide facing the site from where they came.”