September 13, 2026, 04:04:10 PM
Dyatlov Pass Forum

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
For those who lean towards a snow collapse at the ravine, I am curious how do you understand Lyuda's physical position? She is on her knees, with her arms up. I would think a strong snow collapse would, at the very least, knock her off her knees and bring her arms down, before compressing and crushing her ribs. I can't reconcile her death position with a snow collapse.


22
Osi, I for one appreciate your thoughtful reply to Ziljoes post. It seems to be the fashion lately in the forum for anyone who posts an idea to suffer the slings and arrows  of speculative critics who, like school aged kids are more adept at being critical than the opposite.

I have suggested that if the situation in the ravine could be modeled in the material world, or simulated in the digital domain. We could collectively rule in or out the most probable or unlikely explanations.

Although there were discrepancies as to where the ravine actually was, I believe the matter is settled. It would be excellent if any of the expeditions actually mapped the dimensions.
23
Yes, it is plausible to view the collapse of the snow roof as the most logical cause of the trauma sustained by Lyudmila and Zolotaryov. However, the differences in the injuries among the four individuals within that 2-square-meter area do not, in my view, rule out the possibility that the incident occurred outside. Considering the nature of Lyudmila and Semyon's injuries—and the fact that Thibeaux and Alexander suffered head and neck trauma while showing no signs of chest trauma—the situation raises questions. If I am to lean toward the theory Ziljoe advocates—that a snow roof collapse caused these injuries—I need to convince myself of how that could have happened. This snow cave was situated just above the ravine bed on a slope with a 10-degree incline. Lyudmila and Semyon were resting at the lowest point of the slope, followed by Thibeaux, and then Alexander near the cave entrance. The roof collapsed in the direction of the slope, inflicting the most severe damage on Lyudmila and Semyon. Based on the principles of mass and gravity, I am visualizing the sequence of events; Alexander must have been subjected to very little of the collapse's force.
24
General Discussion / Re: Bartolomey
« Last post by sarapuk on September 11, 2026, 12:43:47 PM »


What drove them out of the tent was the light captured in Krivonischenko's final photograph. How could the two Yuris have started a fire when they didn't have any matches on them? A dead Slobodin up on the slope couldn't give them anything, and Kolevatov hadn't even arrived at the cedar tree at that time. And how could Zolotaryov have been digging a snow cave with a camera in his hand?


I think we are getting somewhere by saying that a light drove the group from their tent. And could the so-called balls of light be that light? Or, as I suggest, those orbs?

Personally, I believe Yuri Yudin knew best what was actually shining out there. And it was a command...

This immediately reminded me of an encrypted command that is recorded in their unknown diary:

"In the evening it was decided that we will leave the tent exactly 8 minutes after waking up. Therefore, all have been awake and waiting for the command."

You can see his testimony here with English subtitles, starting from 9:30:




Well found. Andrei Kirilenko
was one of the most influential men in the USSR. He nearly became the top man. A real worker with experience in the DONBAS Ukraine he rose to specialise in economics. Between 1955 and 1962 First Secretary of the Sverdlovsk Regional Party Committee. Appointed by Nikita Khrushev to do other economic work. Very close to Leonid Brezhnev. At the time of the Dyatlov incident Kirilenko would have been close to Khruschev. And as far as the Dyatlov incident is concerned its just a bit more evidence to suggest that the USSR Government had something to cover up.

 




25


Investigators should keep an open mind and not dismiss anything. Open for the unexpected and revelations. I've gone into some detail early on in this Forum on certain injuries to Lyudmila. And snow doesn't figure in my findings. But animal type mutilations do, the sort of mutilations that are happening around the World.

Sarapuk , it's a proof of concept. No one's dismissing anything. Of course one should keep an open mind , but part of keeping an open mind is the bit where we must consider the incident might be quite mundane.

We must consider that their are no animal mutilations that are happening around the world. You are repeating every UFO story from around the world , "there's evidence, because , Bob that works for the CIA , said Steve from the FBI said there's evidence ".

I'm not interested in your findings as I don't even know what they are , you have supplied no evidence and saying you have gone into some detail early on ,is not evidence of anything.

The point of this thread is to evidence, explore or conclude that a drop of snow falling from height X, can or cannot fracture ribs and fracture a skull.

From this we can work from the alleged autopsies
And work from process of elimination. It's a win win. If it can't happen you get to keep your UFO and we move on.
26


I think you would find that such a test would fail to prove that snow was responsible.

That's the point of a test.....
27
What comes to mind is one of those gun or sword shows making the rounds on TV where a human torso made of an artificial skeleton and ballistic gel and a bag of red punch gets put to some sort of gruesome test.

I believe you can see where I am going with this. I am surprised that nobody with an interest and resources has not performed an actual snow crush test. 

In lieu of an actual test, perhaps an AI model could be made. The advantage there is the male and female body densities as well as the densities and fall of compacted snow could all be analysed. From those experimental results we could go back to the DPI and compare findings. It would be a graph makers dream come true.

I think you would find that such a test would fail to prove that snow was responsible.
28
No mention of the mutilations of the 2 bodies in the ravine. Extraordinary injuries, if injury is the correct word to use. And it's highly unlikely that there would have been enough snow at the ravine site to cause certain injuries.

Sarapuk , there is no evidence for mutilations in the autopsy. The ravine four were in that stream bed for 3 months , think about running water over dead flesh .

I want you to think long and hard about the amount of snow in the ravine . It was up to 4 meters in depth, a cubic meter of snow can weigh anything from 50kg to 800kg . Settled snow can weigh from 200-400 kg per cubic meter. The snow in the ravine will have gone through a number of cycles of thawing and freezing, compacting and settling. It will be dence and if for whatever reason , the snow was to give way , we have a substantial mass and energy that could cause the injuries. We have data and examples of these types of injuries sustained in snow collapses.

I'm working from a model with information that we have, look at the photos of the ravine . If you can't put evidence forward , for or against  , please don't throw in random comments of large footprints or UFO's. It's getting tedious for me to be honest. I've read many books on UFOs over 40 years and there's been no evidence other than people saying there is evidence. There's a recent book been launched by some UK judge or lawyer this week. Go and research that and stick it in you thread you started about ufos,. I'm sure it will be interesting for those that come here for that information, they deserve your input.

Investigators should keep an open mind and not dismiss anything. Open for the unexpected and revelations. I've gone into some detail early on in this Forum on certain injuries to Lyudmila. And snow doesn't figure in my findings. But animal type mutilations do, the sort of mutilations that are happening around the World. 
 

29
General Discussion / Re: Bartolomey
« Last post by SURI on September 11, 2026, 02:50:43 AM »


What drove them out of the tent was the light captured in Krivonischenko's final photograph. How could the two Yuris have started a fire when they didn't have any matches on them? A dead Slobodin up on the slope couldn't give them anything, and Kolevatov hadn't even arrived at the cedar tree at that time. And how could Zolotaryov have been digging a snow cave with a camera in his hand?


I think we are getting somewhere by saying that a light drove the group from their tent. And could the so-called balls of light be that light? Or, as I suggest, those orbs?

Personally, I believe Yuri Yudin knew best what was actually shining out there. And it was a command...

This immediately reminded me of an encrypted command that is recorded in their unknown diary:

"In the evening it was decided that we will leave the tent exactly 8 minutes after waking up. Therefore, all have been awake and waiting for the command."

You can see his testimony here with English subtitles, starting from 9:30:

30
Glennm. I was thinking of getting a sheep or animal to test the breaking of the ribs myself but it might be a bit logistically difficult, plus the police might ask what the hell I'm doing. It would be a good one for the "myth busters" . It should be reasonable easy for someone to simulate who has the resources. I have indulged with some of these video's on u tube.

I found two reports of similar incidents.

1. The Mountaineers Training Cave Collapse (Washington, USA)The Case: An alpine safety log detailing a structural failure during an overnight wilderness training field trip.

The Source: The Mountaineers: Structural Engineering Failure! Safety Report

The Incident: Students excavated a large snow cave (10 ft by 7 ft) in heavy, dense snow conditions. Due to temperature fluctuations near freezing, the structural ceiling lost its stability and suffered a sudden, catastrophic engineering failure. The ceiling dropped as a single, consolidated block of dense snow directly onto the students inside, burying them completely.The Injury Profile: One student suffered severe internal thoracic trauma. A medical examination revealed that the heavy weight had caused a flail-type chest injury with torn and severely strained costal cartilage directly connecting the ribs to the sternum.

The Forensic Takeaway: The heavy snow acted like a hydraulic press. Because the massive weight was perfectly distributed across the surface area of the torso, it inflicted severe internal skeletal and cartilage trauma without causing localized impact bruises or breaking the skin. This mirrors the internal trauma found during the autopsies of Dubinina and Zolotaryov.

The Rescue Window: It took nearby teammates exactly 1 to 2 minutes of frantic, panic-driven shovel work to uncover the victims' faces so they could breathe.

2. The Arctic Survival Challenge Cave-In (Arctic Wilderness)

The Case: A documented survival incident involving a massive snow hole collapse during an extreme wilderness challenge.

The Source: Times of Malta: Buried under the snow for three terrifying minutesThe Incident: Miriam Gauci (47) was inside a large snow den designed to shelter 20 people when she heard a "horrible thundering noise." The ice structure sheared off, instantaneously burying her under one metre of compact, sintered snow.

The Rescue Window: Even with an organized survival team standing right outside the shelter, it took exactly 3 minutes to conduct a headcount, realize she was missing, locate her position, and dig her out. Because she was buried in heavy, packed snow, the team couldn't risk swinging sharp spades near her head, severely delaying the excavation.

The Forensic Takeaway: This case highlights the brutal reality of the asphyxiation window. If a person is pinned under heavy, compact snow, they are completely immobilized and face asphyxiation or fatal chest compression within minutes. In the pitch-black darkness of the Siberian night, under 2 to 4 metres of dense snow in a ravine, a 3-minute survival window means certain death before the remaining Dyatlov hikers could physically locate and excavate them.

Times of Malta

Buried under the snow for three terrifying minutes
A mother on a survival challenge in the Arctic wilderness had a lucky escape last week when a snow-hole she was digging suddenly caved in, leaving her trapped under one metre of compact snow. Miriam Gauci, 47, was tunnelling inside the snow hole with...



A mother on a survival challenge in the Arctic wilderness had a lucky escape last week when a snow-hole she was digging suddenly caved in, leaving her trapped under one metre of compact snow.


Miriam Gauci, 47, was tunnelling inside the snow hole with an ice axe to carefully carve a domed ceiling, when it gave way.

Ms Gauci said she could still hear the horrible noise the ice structure, which was to fit 20 people for the night, made when it came crashing down on her.

“There was this horrible loud noise, and suddenly I was in a lot of pain. I was trapped under one metre of heavy, compact snow. I couldn’t move,” she told The Sunday Times.

Her saving grace came in the way she fell: “There was an air pocket by the side of my face. At least I could breathe… and scream. I screamed my head off, really.”

Outside, no one heard her cries, but after a snap headcount, fellow participants realised Ms Gauci was trapped and began a frantic search for her, some even shovelling the snow with their bare hands.

Winston Pirotta, 37, another challenge participant, had got out of the snow-hole a minute earlier: “I had just finished my carving shift and was making my way towards the fire to warm up, when I heard a thundering noise and cries of ‘Collapse! Collapse!’ we all rushed, in shock, on site.

Even now, when, I recall the accident I still get a cold sweat.”

David Schembri, 24, part of the expedition team, was at the other entrance of the snow hole when the accident happened: “I think for the first 15 seconds we were shocked to the roots. Those seconds felt like an hour – but then we quickly gathered our wits and took on rescue roles.”

Apart from Ms Gauci, there were two other people in the snow hole: Maria Vella Galea was literally blasted out of the tunnel and on impact hurt her face.

Martin Farrugia was closer to the entrance and only his legs were trapped.

Although they roughly knew Ms Gauci’s location, the rescuers couldn’t use spades for fear of hurting her. In total, she was trapped under the snow for about three minutes.


“They lasted an eternity, but I was convinced I would get out of there,” she said.

The minute they got her out, she was whisked away in a stretcher to the expedition cabin, and placed in front of a fire to warm up, preventing the onset of hypothermia.

She was seen by a paramedic and two doctors on the team and then a taxi ambulance took her to hospital, an hour away.

Ms Gauci got away with bruised and fractured ribs, and got the all-clear to return to the expedition: “My time was not yet up, I guess. My guardian angel was really by my side.”

The reason for the collapse is still unclear, for only a few hours earlier, 20 of them had been jumping up and down on the snow structure to make it more compact.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10