Recent Posts

21

General Discussion / Re: Connection between broken ribs and missing eyes

« Last post by SURI on June 12, 2026, 08:55:45 PM »

When you think everything is a conspiracy, you can't move the case forward. Have you forgotten that what is logical may not always be right?

22

General Discussion / Re: Connection between broken ribs and missing eyes

« Last post by GlennM on June 12, 2026, 04:28:23 PM »

Hard to verify when DyatlovPass.com is being attacked just now. Nine hikers, nine sets of prints makes sense to me. What am I missing? Is this a conspiracy theory?

23

General Discussion / Re: Connection between broken ribs and missing eyes

« Last post by SURI on June 12, 2026, 09:06:42 AM »

It's a mistake to ignore this number. You'll even find it underlined in the case files. So if you want to do a serious investigation, you should start wondering whose footprints were missing and why. You probably want to know what happened at the tent, right?

24

UFO / Not going to happen

« Last post by GlennM on June 12, 2026, 07:13:44 AM »

There are currently an estimated 6,200 exoplanets have been found in more than 4,700 solar systems, though none are like Earth or our Solar System. It is likely that most stars could have at least one planet. There are more than 100 billion stars in our galaxy alone! The number of planets is therefore astronomical, and some may be habitable.

Now the problems, space is vast – beyond our imagination.Proxima Centauri, the nearest star to our Sun, is about 40 trillion kilometres away, 268,000 times farther than the Sun is from Earth. It would take about 6,650 years to reach Proxima Centauri, so interstellar travel within human lifespans would require much higher velocities.

Let’s assume we did have the means to travel close to the speed of light. Time is relative;  This is called time dilation.Aliens would go home to a planet much older than the one they left – perhaps by a century or more. They would be time exiles.


Then there’s the unimaginably high energy requirement for interstellar travel.
The mass of the spaceship increases with velocity, so an increasing amount of energy is required to accelerate it. At the speed of light, the ship becomes infinitely massive, requiring an infinite amount of energy. This is clearly impossible.


Yet another issue is our biosphere,not toxic for us, but oxygen is reactive and could be highly corrosive for aliens. And while they could wear protective suits like humans do when going to inhospitable environments, reports of visiting aliens do not include any descriptions of spacesuits.

For those of us deficient in science facts, science fiction fills the void. The operant word is fiction.

25

General Discussion / Re: Connection between broken ribs and missing eyes

« Last post by GlennM on June 12, 2026, 06:35:46 AM »

As long as the toes were going down hill. I am not too concerned about the number estimated.

26

General Discussion / Re: Connection between broken ribs and missing eyes

« Last post by SURI on June 12, 2026, 01:03:49 AM »

What baffles me...

If you ignore Tempalov's statement about 8 sets of footprints, you will still be groping. Without this key point, any theory will remain just a fantasy.

Tempalov
„Below the tent 50-60 m from us on the slope, I found 8 sets of footprints of people that were carefully examined, but they were deformed due to winds and temperature fluctuations. I did not find a ninth track, it was simply not there. I photographed the tracks.“

27

General Discussion / Re: 100 questions to Askinadzi

« Last post by GlennM on June 10, 2026, 06:26:01 PM »

All behavior is motivated. All motivations are not easily understood from behavior. This is the "why" we are here.to learn about.

28

General Discussion / Re: Connection between broken ribs and missing eyes

« Last post by GlennM on June 10, 2026, 06:22:10 PM »

Better not to damage the tent at all, yes? They did. For me the justification is one of 4 things. Breathing, bleeding, broken bones or burns. I opt for breathing.

I thought at one time that cutting the tent for shoulder shawls made sense. That,  of course would have ended the hike.Nine experienced hikers did agree on two things thing. That was the certainty nobody was safe at 1079 and everybody would be better off down below.

What baffles me is that a fire and a likely snow cave did not keep them alive, not a single one. Yet, they could do nothing more. They would perish from hunger, if not cold if they chose to walk out of the woods. There was no signal fire, no help signs in the snow. Nobody was coming for them. Igor was warned to not attempt Ortoten in Winter.

I feel they left the tent because it was their best option. They stayed in the woods for the same reason. Nature does not care about reasons. The reason they got into that mess is because what they imagined they could do did not account for extremes in weather.

29

General Discussion / Re: What would histology tell us?

« Last post by GlennM on June 10, 2026, 05:56:35 PM »

My position on the matter is that the hikers made little progress on their last hiking day because of the weather. I believe they made camp relatively early and as soon as they excavated and levelled a place for skis, they pitched their tent. The result was that the tent was exposed to the wind and snow buildup for an even longer period of time than what would be considered normal.

When the tent collapsed under the crush of snow, the group determined that under the conditions they could not get ahead of the elements in order to clear, repair and repitch their tent. They intended to sort things out when the weather abated.

The descent to the woods was longer and more hazardous than anticipated. The cold was relentless. Everything that happened in the woods was a consequence of trying to keep protected from the elements of wind and cold.

My guess is that the bad weather did not abate as they may have hoped. Heroisms were in vain,  plans were compromised and Nature was indifferent. Bad things happen to good people.

30

General Discussion / Re: What would histology tell us?

« Last post by sarapuk on June 10, 2026, 03:08:49 PM »

I read that the lack of histological tests is possible justification to re open the case.

Personally, I think it is all down to weather...except the DP9 acted differently in many regards than I would given the circumstances.

You bring up weather a lot as the cause of what happened. How about a thorough explanation that the weather caused all the separate incidents, at the tent site and on the slope and at the forest and in the so-called ravine.