August 13, 2026, 10:40:57 AM
Dyatlov Pass Forum

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
81
Hi  Ziljoe

Quote
They fit well within what’s expected in severe hypother

So how you explain that :

Quote
Renström anger att beslutet att söka skydd fattades på ett sent stadium och att skyddet som åstadkoms var för dåligt. Utrustningen hade blivit kvar i ryggsäckarna, eftersom de inte gick att öppna med frusna händer. Av samma skäl kunde de drabbade inte heller hantera den ökade urinproduktion som kölden (kyldiures) medförde, utan kläderna vättes ned med urin ända till skorna, med de ökade värmeförluster det innebar.

English translation :

Enström states that the decision to seek shelter was made at a late stage and that the shelter they managed to set up was inadequate. Their gear had remained in their backpacks because they couldn’t open them with frozen hands. For the same reason, the victims were also unable to cope with the increased urine production caused by the cold (cold diuresis), and their clothes became soaked with urine all the way down to their shoes, resulting in increased heat loss.

Source : https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarisolyckan

It's about the Anaris case of 1978 which is often compared to our case !
https://h24-files.s3.amazonaws.com/156890/1278333-eq3lb.pdf

The resulting diuresis is not synonymous with urinary retention—quite the opposite—so that doesn't make sense ! I stand by my assertion regarding symptoms of intoxication, which may have caused psychotic behavior !

You are using one example out of context. It's well known that hypothermia victims retain fluid in their bladder.

During the early and moderate stages of severe hypothermia—while the core body temperature is still above 32 °C—the kidneys produce a massive rush of fluid due to cold diuresis.

The Problem: The skiers' bodies were producing an overwhelming amount of urine very quickly.The Physical Limitation: Because their hands were already frozen solid, they physically could not open their backpacks to get equipment or unbutton their heavy layers of clothes.The Outcome: Unable to control or pause the urge while still conscious, they were forced to urinate directly into their clothing. The wet clothing accelerated their heat loss dramatically, sealing their fate.

2. The Final Stage and Postmortem PhaseThe previous explanation regarding urinary retention applies to what happens right at the brink of death, when the core temperature plummets below 28 °C:The Shutdown: Once a person enters the deepest stage of hypothermia, the autonomic nervous system begins to fail. The body goes rigid, and the internal urinary sphincter undergoes a profound involuntary spasm, locking shut.

The Retained Fluid: Any urine produced after that locking mechanism occurs is trapped. When forensic pathologists perform autopsies on hypothermia victims, they almost always find the bladder containing a significant amount of urine.

82
General Discussion / Re: Regarding the photos from the camera found on Zolotaryov
« Last post by Topaze on August 05, 2026, 07:50:12 PM »
Quote
2) There’s no mention in the case files of Zolotaryov being found with a camera or a camera case.







What da ya think it could be around his neck ?  A Geiger counter ? For chronology I based my assumptions on rational behavior : you wouldn't take a camera that can't take nighttime photos when going out at night, would you ? However, it's true that we are not dealing with rational behavior in this case.

Quote
it isn’t listed among his belongings

For sure it isn't his own camera, he has no camera on his own, but he used Tibo's one. However there's a mysterious unkown camera among the official inventory too. And many mysteries about the film rolls too !
83
Hi  Ziljoe

Quote
They fit well within what’s expected in severe hypother

So how you explain that :

Quote
Renström anger att beslutet att söka skydd fattades på ett sent stadium och att skyddet som åstadkoms var för dåligt. Utrustningen hade blivit kvar i ryggsäckarna, eftersom de inte gick att öppna med frusna händer. Av samma skäl kunde de drabbade inte heller hantera den ökade urinproduktion som kölden (kyldiures) medförde, utan kläderna vättes ned med urin ända till skorna, med de ökade värmeförluster det innebar.

English translation :

Enström states that the decision to seek shelter was made at a late stage and that the shelter they managed to set up was inadequate. Their gear had remained in their backpacks because they couldn’t open them with frozen hands. For the same reason, the victims were also unable to cope with the increased urine production caused by the cold (cold diuresis), and their clothes became soaked with urine all the way down to their shoes, resulting in increased heat loss.

Source : https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarisolyckan

It's about the Anaris case of 1978 which is often compared to our case !
https://h24-files.s3.amazonaws.com/156890/1278333-eq3lb.pdf

The resulting diuresis is not synonymous with urinary retention—quite the opposite—so that doesn't make sense ! I stand by my assertion regarding symptoms of intoxication, which may have caused psychotic behavior !

84
Quote
"[...] Amphetamines, potent α-adrenergic agonists, can induce bladder neck closure and dysfunction by triggering protein kinase A activation. This study suggests that methamphetamine use should be considered in aetiological considerations and excluded in healthy young patients with urinary incontinence. Ketamine uropathy affects over one-quarter of users and can lead to severe lower urinary tract symptoms and upper tract obstruction. Drug abuse can cause bowel incontinence through various mechanisms affecting both physical health and psychological well-being. Chronic amphetamine intake leads to neurogenic bladder and chronic urinary retention, with the mechanism underlying persistent urinary retention being unclear. Meth affects the urinary tract by interrupting communication between nerves and muscles necessary for urination, resulting in urinary retention. [...]"
Source : https://aliyahealthcare.com/does-abusing-amphetamines-lead-to-incontinence.html

Autopsy report of G. Krivonischenko
"The bladder contained up to 500 cm3 of cloudy yellow liquid."
Source: https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-112-119?rbid=17743

Autopsy report of Igor Dyatlov
"The bladder contained up to 1 liter of opaque light yellow liquid."
Source: https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-120-126?rbid=17743

Autopsy report of Zolotaryov
"The bladder contained up to 500 cm3 of opaque yellowish liquid."
There are signs of defecation from the rectum.
Source : https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-349-351?rbid=17743

Autopsy report of Kolevatov
"The bladder contained up to 700 cm3 of murky yellow liquid."
Source : https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-345-348?rbid=17743


NB: I don't take amounts under 500 ml into account, because they're still within the normal range.

Those are exactly the symptoms of taking a high dose of amphetamine !!!! This is well known and well documented !

The problem we have is all the other symptoms along with what we would expect to find in hypothermia.

1) Cold diuresis is a normal physiological response in hypothermia. 
When someone is exposed to cold for a prolonged period, the body shifts blood from the extremities to the core. The kidneys respond by producing more urine. People also lose the urge to void when they’re cold, immobile, or lying still. Bladder volumes of 500–1000 ml are entirely normal in that situation.

2) The autopsy values fall within normal ranges for people who haven’t urinated for several hours. 
These numbers don’t point to stimulant use on their own. They’re consistent with cold exposure, dehydration, and prolonged immobility.

3) Defecation at death is non‑specific. 
Loss of sphincter tone can occur in hypothermia, cardiac arrest, drowning, trauma, and many other causes. It isn’t a specific marker for stimulant intake.It’s also worth noting that Zolotaryov sustained a major blunt‑force trauma to the chest, which can affect bowel control at the moment of death. Severe thoracic injury can disrupt autonomic function and cause loss of sphincter tone.

4) The medical sources you quoted describe chronic stimulant users. 
The bladder and bowel complications listed in those articles develop over weeks or months of repeated use. They don’t appear suddenly after a single dose, and they don’t match the physiology seen in acute cold exposure.

So while the autopsy findings are interesting, they don’t point toward amphetamines on their own. They fit well within what’s expected in severe hypother
85
General Discussion / Re: Regarding the photos from the camera found on Zolotaryov
« Last post by Ziljoe on August 05, 2026, 06:53:22 PM »
I said something wrong about exposure times, so let me correct myself: The longer the exposure time, the more pronounced the light trails will be. In any case, to take proper long-exposure photos, you need a tripod (and possibly a cable release)! Another option is the flash, but if the cameras are indeed the ones shown in the photos on the website:




Source : https://dyatlovpass.com/cameras

None of them have a flash sync terminal (it started with the 1955 Zorki S, they were equipped with one):



In any case, it doesn’t matter at all because a flash only reaches a few meters at most.

Yes, I’m familiar with the phenomenon of pareidolia—it’s like a real-life Rorschach test. As for the photo I pointed out, it’s certainly my own interpretation—we agree on that—but I still find it surprising that random smudges would form unnatural angles and even form a perfect circle with a black object perfectly centered in the middle (which I interpreted as a wheel and its hub), as well as various proportions and details reminiscent of a vehicle viewed from the rear.

Furthermore, unlike the random blots in the other photos, it seems that the subject is roughly centered and isn’t just a tiny “thing” on the edge of the perforations.

Note: I didn’t see any mention of a flash in the official inventories, and if they’d had flashes, we would undoubtedly have seen photos taken inside the tent during the previous nights’ camps.

For those interested in camera equipment:

https://sovietcameras.org/zorki/
https://sovietcameras.org/fed-cameras/

ℹ️

I’m pointing these details out to clearly show that the cameras they had had no chance of taking decent photos at night, so the fact that Zolotaryov had one hanging around his neck when he left the tent suggests that they left the tent before nightfall! It’s a small detail, but it’s important because it’s the only piece of temporal evidence we can deduce from this (chronology).

You wouldn't keep a camera hanging around your neck when you're getting ready to sleep or to rest in your tent, would you?

And the fact that flashlights were found along their path also proves that they planned to return during the night!

This is my understanding.

1) We don’t actually have evidence that the 2015 images came from Zolotaryov’s camera. 
They weren’t circulated during the investigation, and they aren’t tied to any specific camera in the case files. If they were in the archive, they were likely ignored because there’s nothing meaningful visible in them.

2) There’s no mention in the case files of Zolotaryov being found with a camera or a camera case. 
There is a photo where something around his neck looks like a case, but it isn’t listed among his belongings and wasn’t recorded as being found on him.

 3) Having a camera case around your neck inside the tent isn’t unusual. 
People were cooking, repairing gear, changing socks, sorting equipment. Someone handling their camera while others were doing their own tasks is normal tent behaviour. 
 It doesn’t tell us anything about the time of day.

4) Only one flashlight was found on the slope. 
The “beacon” idea has been discussed for years, but it doesn’t provide a timeline either.The other flashlight on the tent
 
So at the moment, the camera case and the damaged film don’t give us any chronological clues about when they left the tent.
86
Quote
"[...] Amphetamines, potent α-adrenergic agonists, can induce bladder neck closure and dysfunction by triggering protein kinase A activation. This study suggests that methamphetamine use should be considered in aetiological considerations and excluded in healthy young patients with urinary incontinence. Ketamine uropathy affects over one-quarter of users and can lead to severe lower urinary tract symptoms and upper tract obstruction. Drug abuse can cause bowel incontinence through various mechanisms affecting both physical health and psychological well-being. Chronic amphetamine intake leads to neurogenic bladder and chronic urinary retention, with the mechanism underlying persistent urinary retention being unclear. Meth affects the urinary tract by interrupting communication between nerves and muscles necessary for urination, resulting in urinary retention. [...]"
Source : https://aliyahealthcare.com/does-abusing-amphetamines-lead-to-incontinence.html

Autopsy report of G. Krivonischenko
"The bladder contained up to 500 cm3 of cloudy yellow liquid."
Source: https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-112-119?rbid=17743

Autopsy report of Igor Dyatlov
"The bladder contained up to 1 liter of opaque light yellow liquid."
Source: https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-120-126?rbid=17743

Autopsy report of Zolotaryov
"The bladder contained up to 500 cm3 of opaque yellowish liquid.
There are signs of defecation from the rectum."

Source : https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-349-351?rbid=17743

Autopsy report of Kolevatov
"The bladder contained up to 700 cm3 of murky yellow liquid."
Source : https://dyatlovpass.com/case-files-345-348?rbid=17743

NB: I don't take amounts under 500 ml into account, because they're still within the normal range.

That's one of the symptomss of taking a high dose of amphetamine !!!! This is well known and well documented !

ℹ️

Clinical Significance

These very large volumes (700 ml to 1 liter) strongly reinforce the hypothesis of severe impairment of consciousness at the time of death. The normal reaction would have been involuntary voiding of urine before death (which also often explains the wet clothing found on cadavers).

Such massive distension therefore constitutes a highly significant pathological indicator that major intoxication preceded death.
87
General Discussion / Re: Regarding the photos from the camera found on Zolotaryov
« Last post by Topaze on August 05, 2026, 05:32:14 PM »
I said something wrong about exposure times, so let me correct myself: The longer the exposure time, the more pronounced the light trails will be. In any case, to take proper long-exposure photos, you need a tripod (and possibly a cable release)! Another option is the flash, but if the cameras are indeed the ones shown in the photos on the website:




Source : https://dyatlovpass.com/cameras

None of them have a flash sync terminal (it started with the 1955 Zorki S, they were equipped with one):



In any case, it doesn’t matter at all because a flash only reaches a few meters at most.

Yes, I’m familiar with the phenomenon of pareidolia—it’s like a real-life Rorschach test. As for the photo I pointed out, it’s certainly my own interpretation—we agree on that—but I still find it surprising that random smudges would form unnatural angles and even form a perfect circle with a black object perfectly centered in the middle (which I interpreted as a wheel and its hub), as well as various proportions and details reminiscent of a vehicle viewed from the rear.

Furthermore, unlike the random blots in the other photos, it seems that the subject is roughly centered and isn’t just a tiny “thing” on the edge of the perforations.

Note: I didn’t see any mention of a flash in the official inventories, and if they’d had flashes, we would undoubtedly have seen photos taken inside the tent during the previous nights’ camps.

For those interested in camera equipment:

https://sovietcameras.org/zorki/
https://sovietcameras.org/fed-cameras/

ℹ️

I’m pointing these details out to clearly show that the cameras they had had no chance of taking decent photos at night, so the fact that Zolotaryov had one hanging around his neck when he left the tent suggests that they left the tent before nightfall! It’s a small detail, but it’s important because it’s the only piece of temporal evidence we can deduce from this (chronology).

You wouldn't keep a camera hanging around your neck when you're getting ready to sleep or to rest in your tent, would you?

And the fact that flashlights were found along their path also proves that they planned to return during the night!
88
General Discussion / Re: Regarding the photos from the camera found on Zolotaryov
« Last post by GlennM on August 05, 2026, 03:48:21 PM »
Topaz,  congratukations on your investigations. Like many others, you are pointing to a suggestion of outside jnterference with the hikers. Pareidolia is a measure of how imaginative an intelligent mind is. Use it wisely, we may yet have a break through.
89
General Discussion / Re: Regarding the photos from the camera found on Zolotaryov
« Last post by Topaze on August 05, 2026, 01:20:09 PM »
Hi GlennM

Zolotaryov didn’t have his own camera and he used Thibeaux-Brignolle’s. In any case, there’s no proof these photos came from his camera; they were presented at a symposium in 2015 and hadn’t appeared before then. The poor quality, however, could be due to the film having been submerged in water for several months.
Of all the photos attributed to this roll of film, this is the only one that caught my attention; the others make no sense.

Night photos?

The Zorki and FED cameras used didn’t allow for exposure times longer than 1 second anyway, and without a sufficiently long exposure, any moving light source produces trails that are more or less distinct (or pronounced) depending on the speed of movement (and/or deceleration) of the moving subject.

Another thing: due to the focal lengths of the 20- and 22-mm lenses, it was impossible to explicitly photograph an object in the sky.
90
General Discussion / Re: Regarding the photos from the camera found on Zolotaryov
« Last post by GlennM on August 05, 2026, 11:53:22 AM »
This horse has been whipped numerous times. The case files show specks highly magnified and greatly exaggerated from obviously ruined film. It is interesting that the case files do not associate a full roll of photos with Zolos camera, instead we get a curated selection of the damaged film roll.

That the film was named Zolotov appears to confirm it was taken from his belongings in the tent or from his body in the stream.

A fair question to ask is why the other photos developed from the other cameras were so much better quality.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10