September 18, 2026, 06:28:25 PM
Dyatlov Pass Forum

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
81


I think you would find that such a test would fail to prove that snow was responsible.

That's the point of a test.....
82
What comes to mind is one of those gun or sword shows making the rounds on TV where a human torso made of an artificial skeleton and ballistic gel and a bag of red punch gets put to some sort of gruesome test.

I believe you can see where I am going with this. I am surprised that nobody with an interest and resources has not performed an actual snow crush test. 

In lieu of an actual test, perhaps an AI model could be made. The advantage there is the male and female body densities as well as the densities and fall of compacted snow could all be analysed. From those experimental results we could go back to the DPI and compare findings. It would be a graph makers dream come true.

I think you would find that such a test would fail to prove that snow was responsible.
83
No mention of the mutilations of the 2 bodies in the ravine. Extraordinary injuries, if injury is the correct word to use. And it's highly unlikely that there would have been enough snow at the ravine site to cause certain injuries.

Sarapuk , there is no evidence for mutilations in the autopsy. The ravine four were in that stream bed for 3 months , think about running water over dead flesh .

I want you to think long and hard about the amount of snow in the ravine . It was up to 4 meters in depth, a cubic meter of snow can weigh anything from 50kg to 800kg . Settled snow can weigh from 200-400 kg per cubic meter. The snow in the ravine will have gone through a number of cycles of thawing and freezing, compacting and settling. It will be dence and if for whatever reason , the snow was to give way , we have a substantial mass and energy that could cause the injuries. We have data and examples of these types of injuries sustained in snow collapses.

I'm working from a model with information that we have, look at the photos of the ravine . If you can't put evidence forward , for or against  , please don't throw in random comments of large footprints or UFO's. It's getting tedious for me to be honest. I've read many books on UFOs over 40 years and there's been no evidence other than people saying there is evidence. There's a recent book been launched by some UK judge or lawyer this week. Go and research that and stick it in you thread you started about ufos,. I'm sure it will be interesting for those that come here for that information, they deserve your input.

Investigators should keep an open mind and not dismiss anything. Open for the unexpected and revelations. I've gone into some detail early on in this Forum on certain injuries to Lyudmila. And snow doesn't figure in my findings. But animal type mutilations do, the sort of mutilations that are happening around the World. 
 

84
General Discussion / Re: Bartolomey
« Last post by SURI on September 11, 2026, 02:50:43 AM »


What drove them out of the tent was the light captured in Krivonischenko's final photograph. How could the two Yuris have started a fire when they didn't have any matches on them? A dead Slobodin up on the slope couldn't give them anything, and Kolevatov hadn't even arrived at the cedar tree at that time. And how could Zolotaryov have been digging a snow cave with a camera in his hand?


I think we are getting somewhere by saying that a light drove the group from their tent. And could the so-called balls of light be that light? Or, as I suggest, those orbs?

Personally, I believe Yuri Yudin knew best what was actually shining out there. And it was a command...

This immediately reminded me of an encrypted command that is recorded in their unknown diary:

"In the evening it was decided that we will leave the tent exactly 8 minutes after waking up. Therefore, all have been awake and waiting for the command."

You can see his testimony here with English subtitles, starting from 9:30:

85
Glennm. I was thinking of getting a sheep or animal to test the breaking of the ribs myself but it might be a bit logistically difficult, plus the police might ask what the hell I'm doing. It would be a good one for the "myth busters" . It should be reasonable easy for someone to simulate who has the resources. I have indulged with some of these video's on u tube.

I found two reports of similar incidents.

1. The Mountaineers Training Cave Collapse (Washington, USA)The Case: An alpine safety log detailing a structural failure during an overnight wilderness training field trip.

The Source: The Mountaineers: Structural Engineering Failure! Safety Report

The Incident: Students excavated a large snow cave (10 ft by 7 ft) in heavy, dense snow conditions. Due to temperature fluctuations near freezing, the structural ceiling lost its stability and suffered a sudden, catastrophic engineering failure. The ceiling dropped as a single, consolidated block of dense snow directly onto the students inside, burying them completely.The Injury Profile: One student suffered severe internal thoracic trauma. A medical examination revealed that the heavy weight had caused a flail-type chest injury with torn and severely strained costal cartilage directly connecting the ribs to the sternum.

The Forensic Takeaway: The heavy snow acted like a hydraulic press. Because the massive weight was perfectly distributed across the surface area of the torso, it inflicted severe internal skeletal and cartilage trauma without causing localized impact bruises or breaking the skin. This mirrors the internal trauma found during the autopsies of Dubinina and Zolotaryov.

The Rescue Window: It took nearby teammates exactly 1 to 2 minutes of frantic, panic-driven shovel work to uncover the victims' faces so they could breathe.

2. The Arctic Survival Challenge Cave-In (Arctic Wilderness)

The Case: A documented survival incident involving a massive snow hole collapse during an extreme wilderness challenge.

The Source: Times of Malta: Buried under the snow for three terrifying minutesThe Incident: Miriam Gauci (47) was inside a large snow den designed to shelter 20 people when she heard a "horrible thundering noise." The ice structure sheared off, instantaneously burying her under one metre of compact, sintered snow.

The Rescue Window: Even with an organized survival team standing right outside the shelter, it took exactly 3 minutes to conduct a headcount, realize she was missing, locate her position, and dig her out. Because she was buried in heavy, packed snow, the team couldn't risk swinging sharp spades near her head, severely delaying the excavation.

The Forensic Takeaway: This case highlights the brutal reality of the asphyxiation window. If a person is pinned under heavy, compact snow, they are completely immobilized and face asphyxiation or fatal chest compression within minutes. In the pitch-black darkness of the Siberian night, under 2 to 4 metres of dense snow in a ravine, a 3-minute survival window means certain death before the remaining Dyatlov hikers could physically locate and excavate them.

Times of Malta

Buried under the snow for three terrifying minutes
A mother on a survival challenge in the Arctic wilderness had a lucky escape last week when a snow-hole she was digging suddenly caved in, leaving her trapped under one metre of compact snow. Miriam Gauci, 47, was tunnelling inside the snow hole with...



A mother on a survival challenge in the Arctic wilderness had a lucky escape last week when a snow-hole she was digging suddenly caved in, leaving her trapped under one metre of compact snow.


Miriam Gauci, 47, was tunnelling inside the snow hole with an ice axe to carefully carve a domed ceiling, when it gave way.

Ms Gauci said she could still hear the horrible noise the ice structure, which was to fit 20 people for the night, made when it came crashing down on her.

“There was this horrible loud noise, and suddenly I was in a lot of pain. I was trapped under one metre of heavy, compact snow. I couldn’t move,” she told The Sunday Times.

Her saving grace came in the way she fell: “There was an air pocket by the side of my face. At least I could breathe… and scream. I screamed my head off, really.”

Outside, no one heard her cries, but after a snap headcount, fellow participants realised Ms Gauci was trapped and began a frantic search for her, some even shovelling the snow with their bare hands.

Winston Pirotta, 37, another challenge participant, had got out of the snow-hole a minute earlier: “I had just finished my carving shift and was making my way towards the fire to warm up, when I heard a thundering noise and cries of ‘Collapse! Collapse!’ we all rushed, in shock, on site.

Even now, when, I recall the accident I still get a cold sweat.”

David Schembri, 24, part of the expedition team, was at the other entrance of the snow hole when the accident happened: “I think for the first 15 seconds we were shocked to the roots. Those seconds felt like an hour – but then we quickly gathered our wits and took on rescue roles.”

Apart from Ms Gauci, there were two other people in the snow hole: Maria Vella Galea was literally blasted out of the tunnel and on impact hurt her face.

Martin Farrugia was closer to the entrance and only his legs were trapped.

Although they roughly knew Ms Gauci’s location, the rescuers couldn’t use spades for fear of hurting her. In total, she was trapped under the snow for about three minutes.


“They lasted an eternity, but I was convinced I would get out of there,” she said.

The minute they got her out, she was whisked away in a stretcher to the expedition cabin, and placed in front of a fire to warm up, preventing the onset of hypothermia.

She was seen by a paramedic and two doctors on the team and then a taxi ambulance took her to hospital, an hour away.

Ms Gauci got away with bruised and fractured ribs, and got the all-clear to return to the expedition: “My time was not yet up, I guess. My guardian angel was really by my side.”

The reason for the collapse is still unclear, for only a few hours earlier, 20 of them had been jumping up and down on the snow structure to make it more compact.
86
What comes to mind is one of those gun or sword shows making the rounds on TV where a human torso made of an artificial skeleton and ballistic gel and a bag of red punch gets put to some sort of gruesome test.

I believe you can see where I am going with this. I am surprised that nobody with an interest and resources has not performed an actual snow crush test. 

In lieu of an actual test, perhaps an AI model could be made. The advantage there is the male and female body densities as well as the densities and fall of compacted snow could all be analysed. From those experimental results we could go back to the DPI and compare findings. It would be a graph makers dream come true.
87
No mention of the mutilations of the 2 bodies in the ravine. Extraordinary injuries, if injury is the correct word to use. And it's highly unlikely that there would have been enough snow at the ravine site to cause certain injuries.

Sarapuk , there is no evidence for mutilations in the autopsy. The ravine four were in that stream bed for 3 months , think about running water over dead flesh .

I want you to think long and hard about the amount of snow in the ravine . It was up to 4 meters in depth, a cubic meter of snow can weigh anything from 50kg to 800kg . Settled snow can weigh from 200-400 kg per cubic meter. The snow in the ravine will have gone through a number of cycles of thawing and freezing, compacting and settling. It will be dence and if for whatever reason , the snow was to give way , we have a substantial mass and energy that could cause the injuries. We have data and examples of these types of injuries sustained in snow collapses.

I'm working from a model with information that we have, look at the photos of the ravine . If you can't put evidence forward , for or against  , please don't throw in random comments of large footprints or UFO's. It's getting tedious for me to be honest. I've read many books on UFOs over 40 years and there's been no evidence other than people saying there is evidence. There's a recent book been launched by some UK judge or lawyer this week. Go and research that and stick it in you thread you started about ufos,. I'm sure it will be interesting for those that come here for that information, they deserve your input.
88
General Discussion / Re: I'm as curious as everyone else
« Last post by sarapuk on September 10, 2026, 04:54:54 PM »
My advice is to use all sources and simply decide on facts. People are drawn to these sites for various reasons. Some people may be here to assist the Russian Government in its ongoing cover-up of certain facts. I'm not saying that the Russian Government is wrong to cover up those certain facts because they may have a good reason to do so. I'm just trying to figure out what actually happened. Because what happened was very unusual and not of a force that we can understand at the moment. 



89
Just a few additional words about the case files -

It is capital to understand that all 9 autopsy reports that we see in the case files are not originals, they are drafts and re-prints. There is a tiny possibility that texts of these reports fully match the originals. But more realistically, Ivanov could have "adjusted” something before putting the reports into the folder, which had no registration number. If that was the case, it was not Ivanov who made the decisions about what needed to be removed from the texts of the original medical records. This is NOT within the purview of the prosecutor’s office at all. These decisions were made by an authorized KGB officer who had been granted the right to decide what constituted a state secret and what did not. Measures to ensure the preservation of state secrets were within the purview of the KGB, not the prosecutor’s office.

The fact that Ivanov spent a lot of time producing the re-prints hints that certain corrections to the autopsy reports were made indeed. It also indicates that Ivanov received "blessing" from the top of his organization to manufacture the case files in the form, which we have found them. This is not normal or "rural" way to create case files at all.

It's certainly interesting to note that Ivanov said a lot after the collapse of the USSR. And he wasn't the only one. And it's also interesting to note that as the years went by and more and more people were showing an interest in this mystery, the authorities once again stepped in to quiet things down, hence the opening of the case again some years ago that was obviously designed to cover something up.


90
An incident caused by snow in the valley, or a fall by tourists, doesn't seem sufficient to explain the trauma they suffered. I'm leaning more towards the idea that they were injured in the tent and then moved. A few photos of footprints taken the day the tent was first found, and witness statements, suggest the prints belong to 8 or 9 people. Could someone please explain the motivation behind this? Couldn't it belong to 6 people, for example?

I think a detailed study of the number of prints would shed a lot of light. Regarding Glenn M.'s question, I think the group, after descending the slope, first looked for a natural snow cave to protect the injured from the cold. So, before the fire pit and cedar tree, the hole in the valley was discovered, and the injured were moved there. Because this area was quite low-lying and treeless, a lot of snow accumulated. Due to various snow movements, trees didn't grow properly there. As for the distance between the fire pit and the valley; the cedar tree was higher up. There were probably mature trees nearby as well. Almost no snow accumulated. It provided both firewood and the ideal ground for lighting a fire. After placing 3 or 4 wounded people in the valley, the remaining 5 or 6 would gather wood, light a fire, dig a windbreak pit near the valley, and prepare a mat from branches.

You are correct about the snow not being a sufficient explanation for the demise of the 9 people. Snow was there, and so were cold and wind, but not enough to cause whatever happened. Also, I still question the footprints near the tent. Apparently, one or more searchers remember seeing very large footprints in that location, but they were never photographed.

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10