June 22, 2026, 03:37:41 PM
Dyatlov Pass Forum

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
81
Meteor / Re: Boston Meteor on May 30, 2026
« Last post by sarapuk on June 10, 2026, 02:35:25 PM »
Too easy.

It's that easy that you haven't said so. Even an approximation would be something. 
82
General Discussion / Re: Alexej Rakitin contact
« Last post by Hunter on June 09, 2026, 09:36:32 AM »
Es ist unwahrscheinlich, dass Sie eine Antwort erhalten. Ich habe Rakitin wegen der Widersprüche in seinen Texten angeschrieben, aber keine Antwort erhalten.

ENGLISH TRANSLATION: It is unlikely that you will receive a response. I wrote to Rakitin because of the contradictions in his texts, but received no response.
83
General Discussion / Re: Alexej Rakitin contact
« Last post by Lampe7 on June 08, 2026, 09:07:46 PM »
Hallo Hunter.

Tausend Dank!
Thank you very much 😊.
Hugh Help!
84
General Discussion / Re: Alexej Rakitin contact
« Last post by Hunter on June 08, 2026, 11:13:00 AM »
Guten Tag.
Site:
https://murders.ru

E-mail:
aleksey.rakitin.murders.site@yandex.ru

85
General Discussion / Re: Alexej Rakitin contact
« Last post by Lampe7 on June 06, 2026, 01:58:19 PM »
Thanks you Teddy. Your right, it ist only a pen name. And yes, i didn't found a contact to the Person / the group as well.

But I thought, maybe someone in this round knows a mail address or something like this.

If yes, I would be happy, If not, I wouldn't be worry.
86
General Discussion / Re: Alexej Rakitin contact
« Last post by Teddy on June 06, 2026, 01:47:11 PM »
There is no Alexey Rakitin. This is a pen name. There are group of writers with one elderly but no one is called Rakitin and no one has ever made contact with them. They do not answer any questions.
They started with science fiction → "Cossacks in Space" book series by Alexey Ivanovich Rakitin.
Then I discovered a new topic.
87
General Discussion / Alexej Rakitin contact
« Last post by Lampe7 on June 06, 2026, 01:31:25 PM »
Hello together,
I reed the book of Alexej Rakitin many times. I agree with hin in many Points but I also found aspects, where my logic ends in a different result coming from the fact Side to him.

Ist there a known contact to wrote him? Also pm Welcome.

Thanks.
88
General Discussion / Re: What would histology tell us?
« Last post by GlennM on June 06, 2026, 06:32:25 AM »
Killing 9 Soviet athletes questing for Master of Sport is bad politics. These people exemplify Russian ideals to friends and community youth.The national government was putting its best foot forward. Killing kids in the middle of nowhere is wrong headed thinking and a policy which only produces public distaste for authority.

Additionally those brave souls who later advocate for that unlikely murderous explanation would gamble with their own lives if there  were a kernel of truth in any of it.

...Or

It is sensationalized smoke and mirrors invention designed to make money off the dead because it is all make believe conspiracies.

The conundrum for me is reconciling the deliberate deaths of nine people in a remote location ostensibly to make some sort of example of them, which of course did not happen. On the other hand those few officials who knew to keep quiet did not keep their mouths shut.  This is all nonsense on stilts.






89
General Discussion / Re: What would histology tell us?
« Last post by SURI on June 06, 2026, 01:42:49 AM »
Only the weather as the cause of DP9's death does not fit with this statement by Ivanov:

„The true causes of the deaths were hidden from the people, and only a few knew these reasons: the former first secretary of the regional committee A.P. Kirilenko, the second secretary of the regional committee A.F. Eshtokin, the regional prosecutor N. I. Klimov and the author of these lines, who were investigating the case“

And the rocket theory does not correspond to these words of Ivanov:

„Someone needed to frighten or punish people, or show their strength, and they did this, killing three people“.

Conclusion:
So there was something to hide, but it wasn't rockets.
90
General Discussion / What would histology tell us?
« Last post by GlennM on June 05, 2026, 03:37:45 PM »
I read that the lack of histological tests is possible justification to re open the case. What are those tests going to yield? To me, the priority would be first and foremost, locating the original samples. Once any samples were obtained, I can only think that poisoning would be the one and only thing to be ruled out. Does anybody seriously believe the group was accidentally or intentionally poisoned? I think not.! Further I do not think hallucinogens as a poison were involved . The hikers left the tent in far too straight a line.

Later, the rescue team drank the alcohol. Canned goods were appropriated. Nobody died.Nobody flipped out.

What I think is going on is the missing histological reports is the proverbial thin entering wedge to open and widen this case. To what end? To better assess the 1959 case records and revise them. Next, to discredit the loose and sensationalistic commentary by persons directly and indirectly associated with the case. Exhuming 60+ year old remains is not going to reveal much.

What I would like to see is whether there is a link between the geological activities at the time and the DPI. I would like to see the weather report that Teddy could not get without paying a ransom for. I would like confirmation that there was no military activity nor cover up associated with the DPI.  I want confirmation of any meteorite or bolide which would link to a slab slide.
I would like wind tunnel tests and computer modelling.

Personally, I think it is all down to weather...except the DP9 acted differently in many regards than I would given the circumstances.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10