Liquid oxygen evaporates into invisible gas, and kerosene leaves a highly pungent, greasy oil slick. The 1959 searchers found completely pristine, odorless snow, and zero metal debris or impact craters.
AI can argue with you a little bit:
"A high-pressure kerosene leak can create a fine aerosol or mist cloud. If that cloud mixes with air or oxygen and finds an ignition source, it can cause a flash fire or vapor cloud explosion. Near a rocket, there are many possible ignition sources: sparks, static electricity, hot surfaces, or open flames."
"Kerosene itself is not very volatile at room temperature, but in rocketry it is often hot, pressurized, sprayed as a mist, and used near liquid oxygen. Under those conditions, a kerosene cloud can explode, especially if ignition is delayed or if fuel and oxidizer mix outside the engine."
"A simplified combustion reaction:
Kerosene + O₂ → CO₂ + H₂O + energy"
So, products of kerosene combustion are CO₂ which simply goes to the air, H₂O which can pour snowy slope and fix footprints in ice, and energy which can throw unlucky people on the stones.
Don't worry , I argue with AI. I've been trying to find a model that works.
your AI quotes are perfectly correct about how kerosene behaves inside a factory or a pressurized engine compartment, but they seem to fall apart when applied to a rocket miles high in the open, freezing Siberian atmosphere.Here is the actual science that disproves this "exploding kerosene water" theory:1. The "Water" Would Be a Blinding Flash of Vapor, Not RainThe AI notes that kerosene combustion produces \(H_{2}O\) (water) and energy. However, because a rocket explosion releases massive, instantaneous thermal energy (thousands of degrees), that water is created as superheated, invisible gas vapor (steam).In a sub-zero, high-wind alpine environment, that steam would instantly flash-freeze into microscopic ice crystals and blow away in the wind like a puff of smoke. It would not neatly descend through the air as a concentrated liquid downpour to delicately "fix" individual footprints on the ground.2. A Vapor Explosion Leaves Heavy Carbon SootThe reaction formula your AI provided is a perfect combustion model. In the real world, rocket explosions are highly imperfect and messy. When kerosene explodes in the open air, it produces massive amounts of unburned carbon (soot) and black smoke.If a kerosene flash fire or explosion had occurred close enough to the ground to throw the hikers onto the stones, the snowpack, the trees, the canvas tent, and the hikers' clothes and skin would have been heavily coated in thick, oily, jet-black soot. The 1959 searchers found completely white, pristine, odorless snow and clean clothing.3. Blast Injuries vs. The Autopsy Reality .if the "energy" from this kerosene blast threw the unlucky hikers onto the stones, causing their famous fractures. This contradicts basic forensic pathology:No External Trauma: A vapor cloud explosion powerful enough to fracture a human skull and shatter ribs would cause massive external blast trauma. It would blow out the hikers' eardrums, burn their hair, scorch their skin, and shred their thin clothing.The Medical Verdict: Dr. Boris Vozrozhdenny, the original 1959 coroner, explicitly noted that the severe internal injuries (like Dubinina and Zolotaryov’s shattered ribs) had zero external bruising, zero burns, and zero blast marks. He explicitly concluded that the trauma was caused by a continuous, massive hydrostatic pressure—exactly like being compressed under a heavy slab of packed snow or an avalanche—not a sudden, concussive military explosion.At the end of the day, using an AI to find generic combustion equations doesn't change the laws of thermodynamics on Kholat Syakhl. A supersonic, burning rocket failure miles high in the air cannot neatly manufacture liquid water to freeze footprints while simultaneously leaving the snow perfectly white and odorless.
The rocket stage can't get to the pass in a form that can hold fuel.
Topic: Bartolomey (Read 8085 times)
