1
2
General Discussion / Re: Vertical distance from top of bank to creek
« Last post by Partorg on Today at 10:12:05 AM »Quote from: GlennM
I am inclined to think this study of snow buildup has relevance for the tent on 1079 too, yes?If we mean the deposition of blizzard snow on the tent, then of course the snow should have settled on the leeward slope of the roof, but it would hardly have had time to accumulate there in any significant quantity. They had just moved into the tent and haven't even started dinner yet. The sliced pork loin at the exit speaks volumes about this.
3
General Discussion / Re: Vertical distance from top of bank to creek
« Last post by Ziljoe on Today at 05:07:10 AM »I don't know if these photos help the debate but we can see it's a small cornice in the first picture, and the second cornice is made in a flat field.
I think it's most likely possible that something like this was at the ravine, whether that ended up as a complete snow bridge over the ravine or partly covered, it just seems to fit best with injuries and how and why the ravine 4 came to be there.
We know the ravine can get fully covered with snow, we know the ravine 4 had high impact or crush type injuries , we know that the bodies were lying on the ground ( or close to a hard surface) and the injuries correspond to the contact area from the hard surface to the ground.
Coincidence perhaps.
The author writes;
"A rabbit or squirrel might have trouble with the one in the photo but otherwise I think it’s pretty safe."
This was created in a flat field
I think it's most likely possible that something like this was at the ravine, whether that ended up as a complete snow bridge over the ravine or partly covered, it just seems to fit best with injuries and how and why the ravine 4 came to be there.
We know the ravine can get fully covered with snow, we know the ravine 4 had high impact or crush type injuries , we know that the bodies were lying on the ground ( or close to a hard surface) and the injuries correspond to the contact area from the hard surface to the ground.
Coincidence perhaps.
The author writes;
"A rabbit or squirrel might have trouble with the one in the photo but otherwise I think it’s pretty safe."
This was created in a flat field
5
Introductions / Hello :)
« Last post by Drake.Lacatski on Today at 03:31:34 AM »Hello, I'm new here and I have been interested in the Dyatlov Pass tragedy for several years 😉
6
General Discussion / Re: Vertical distance from top of bank to creek
« Last post by GlennM on October 09, 2024, 09:00:58 PM »While the gods on Olympus thunder at each other, I am inclined to think this study of snow buildup has relevance for the tent on 1079 too, yes?
7
General Discussion / Re: Vertical distance from top of bank to creek
« Last post by Partorg on October 09, 2024, 08:17:33 PM »Quote from: Ziljoe
A cornice doesn't need to be an exposed mountain top?Yes, that's how it is. This is, for example, how the Canadian reference book “Snow”, published in the USSR in 1986, presents the deposits of blizzard snow on typical obstacles.
But the respected WAB has the ability to challenge even what he sees with his own eyes, so he most likely will not recognize your picture as a worthy argument.
8
General Discussion / Re: Vertical distance from top of bank to creek
« Last post by Partorg on October 09, 2024, 07:01:18 PM »Quote from: WAB
You have an amazing ability to understand everything not as it really is, but as you yourself have inventedDear WAB!
IMHO, it is still less surprising than the ability to make accusations of disinformation and transfer their specification to the next post, which will be written a few days later.
Once again: the authorship of the preamble to the diagram Helga with the words: “The drawing was made in accordance with the scale and exact dimensions taken from the works of KAN and Shura” belongs to Helga herself. That is why I did not consider it necessary to remove it. Do you think that Ms Helga is deliberately misinforming the public?
Or is she just sincerely mistaken?
9
General Discussion / Re: Vertical distance from top of bank to creek
« Last post by Ziljoe on October 09, 2024, 05:10:25 PM »@ WAB and partorg.
I have great respect for you both and I shall expose my ignorance and lay myself naked for criticism.. with both of your arguments where does the following video fit it in with what you both propose a cornice is?
With my lack of knowledge, would something like this be possible at the ravine?
https://youtube.com/shorts/Q9Az0idgPxQ?si=cXhJ0j1r0GHOfSq0
A cornice doesn't need to be an exposed mountain top?
I have great respect for you both and I shall expose my ignorance and lay myself naked for criticism.. with both of your arguments where does the following video fit it in with what you both propose a cornice is?
With my lack of knowledge, would something like this be possible at the ravine?
https://youtube.com/shorts/Q9Az0idgPxQ?si=cXhJ0j1r0GHOfSq0
A cornice doesn't need to be an exposed mountain top?
10
General Discussion / Re: Vertical distance from top of bank to creek
« Last post by amashilu on October 09, 2024, 03:42:36 PM »If bad guys threw the ravine4 over the bank into the stream below, would the height from the top of the bank down to the creek be enough to break their ribs and skulls etc. when they landed on rocks in the creek? I don't know if that would be the equivalent of a car crash at high speed.